Skip to content

Involved Field Elective Volume De-Intensification Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

A Prospective Phase II Study of Involved Field Elective Volume De-Intensification for Oropharyngeal and Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03067610
Acronym
INFIELD
Enrollment
72
Registered
2017-03-01
Start date
2017-01-20
Completion date
2021-03-09
Last updated
2022-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Head and Neck Cancer, Neoplasms, Oral, Neoplasms, Pharyngeal

Brief summary

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy (if given, either cisplatin, cetuximab, or carboplatin-paclitaxel)

Detailed description

This study aims to significantly improve the acute and late morbidity of patients with oropharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma both by tailoring the elective irradiation only to regions with a legitimate risk of recurrence (\> 5%) and by lowering the elective dose to 40 Gy. Level IB will not be electively treated unless it is involved with pathologic or suspicious lymphadenopathy. Level V will not be treated unless two or more ipsilateral nodal levels are involved (or level V itself has pathologic or suspicious adenopathy). Levels III and IV will only be irradiated if the immediately proximal level contains pathologic lymphadenopathy (i.e. level III irradiated if level II is positive; level IV irradiated if level III is positive). We anticipate that this approach should dramatically improve the acute and late complication profile.

Interventions

RADIATIONIntensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

The radiotherapy plan wil be delivered in 2 sequential courses. The first course involves 20 fractions of 2 Gy per fraction to the entire volume (gross disease and elective). The second course involves 15 fractions (thus, total of 35 fractions), at either 2 Gy (gross disease) or 1.6 Gy (microscopic disease and suspicious node) per fraction.

DRUGchemotherapy

chemotherapy (if given, either cisplatin, cetuximab, or carboplatin-paclitaxel) per physician discretion

Sponsors

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

radiation therapy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pathologically-proven diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx or larynx. Squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary is not allowed. * Patients must have clinically or radiographically evident measureable disease at the primary site and/or nodal stations. Patients may undergo a diagnostic tonsillectomy, and diagnostic lymph node excision (\< 2 nodes) is also allowable. * Clinical stage I-IVB (AJCC, 7th edition); stages I-II glottic cancer are excluded * Age ≥ 18 years. * ECOG Performance Status 0-2 * Adequate organ and marrow function as defined below: * leukocytes ≥ 3,000/mcL * absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mcL * platelets ≥ 100,000/mcl * total bilirubin within normal institutional limits * AST(SGOT)/ALT(SPGT) ≤ 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal * Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and for 90 days following completion of therapy. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. * A female of child-bearing potential is any woman (regardless of sexual orientation, having undergone a tubal ligation, or remaining celibate by choice) who meets the following criteria: * Has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or * Has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months). * Negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 2 weeks before registration for women of childbearing potential. * Neck CT and/or neck MRI, and whole body PET-CT. * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Distant metastasis or adenopathy below the clavicles. * Inability to undergo PET-CT. * Stage I and II glottic carcinoma. * Gross total excision of both the primary and nodal disease. * Synchronous primaries outside of the oropharynx and larynx. * Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease-free for a minimum of 1 years * Prior systemic chemotherapy for the study cancer; prior chemotherapy for a remote cancer is allowable * Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation fields. * Subjects may not be receiving any other investigational agents. * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to the chemotherapy agents in this study (if necessary). * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements. * Subjects must not be pregnant or nursing due to the potential for congenital abnormalities and the potential of this regimen to harm nursing infants. * History of immunosuppression or autoimmunity, including HIV, and organ or stem cell transplant, or an autoimmune condition previously treated with immunosuppressive therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Solitary Elective Volume Recurrence2 yearsThe crude risk of 2-year solitary elective volume recurrence will be calculated among all patients who are followed for at least 2 years. Patients who die before 2 years without an SEVR will be included in the denominator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Definite, Possible, and Probable Protocol-related Toxicities (Grade 3-5)2 yearsOnly adverse events (grade 3-5) assessed to be definitely, probably, or possibly related to protocol treatment up to 2 years post-treatment will be considered. This was measured according to NCI's CTCAE v4.0 toxicity criteria.
Total Number of Participants With Gastrostomy Dependence2 yearsThe prevalence of gastrostomy use up to 2 years will be described.
Patient Utilities2 yearsThe average patient utilities (derived from EQ-5D) from baseline up to 2 years from the end of treatment will be described. Changes in patient utility will be analyzed using generalized estimated equations (GEE).
Quality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)12 monthsQuality of life (QOL) patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for overall number of participants following treatment with elective volume and dose de-escalation, using European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EORTC HN35, which is specific to head and neck cancer, and composite MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 are scored on a 4-point categorical scale ranging from 1 not at all to 4 very much. This scale is then linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, where a higher score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents higher level functioning, a high score for quality of life represents a high quality of life, and a high score for a symptom scale represents worse symptoms. MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire: Possible score ranges from 0-100, with higher score indicating higher functioning.
Progression-free Survival2 yearProgression-free survival will be calculated from the initiation of treatment. Progression is confirmed by biopsy, which will be used as the date of progression.
Probability of Locoregional or Distant Tumor Failure2 yearsThe percentage of patients with locoregional or distant failure within 2 years of treatment will be estimated using cumulative incidence statistics, with death serving as the competing risk. Cumulative incidence refers to the estimated risk/probability of tumor failure within 2 years of treatment, either locoregional recurrence or distant metastasis, accounting for the competing risk of death.
Overall Survival2 yearsOverall survival will be calculated from the initiation of treatment using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Radiation Therapy
Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy (if given, either cisplatin, cetuximab, or carboplatin-paclitaxel) Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: The radiotherapy plan wil be delivered in 2 sequential courses. The first course involves 20 fractions of 2 Gy per fraction to the entire volume (gross disease and elective). The second course involves 15 fractions (thus, total of 35 fractions), at either 2 Gy (gross disease) or 1.6 Gy (microscopic disease and suspicious node) per fraction. chemotherapy: chemotherapy (if given, either cisplatin, cetuximab, or carboplatin-paclitaxel) per physician discretion
72
Total72

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRadiation Therapy
Age, Continuous59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Disease site
Larynx
21 Participants
Disease site
Oropharynx
51 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
58 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
72 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
59 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 72
other
Total, other adverse events
65 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
35 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Solitary Elective Volume Recurrence

The crude risk of 2-year solitary elective volume recurrence will be calculated among all patients who are followed for at least 2 years. Patients who die before 2 years without an SEVR will be included in the denominator.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radiation TherapyNumber of Patients With Solitary Elective Volume Recurrence0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Definite, Possible, and Probable Protocol-related Toxicities (Grade 3-5)

Only adverse events (grade 3-5) assessed to be definitely, probably, or possibly related to protocol treatment up to 2 years post-treatment will be considered. This was measured according to NCI's CTCAE v4.0 toxicity criteria.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radiation TherapyNumber of Participants With Definite, Possible, and Probable Protocol-related Toxicities (Grade 3-5)3 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival will be calculated from the initiation of treatment using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Reported the percentage of the total patient population who survived to 2 years post-treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiation TherapyOverall Survival89 percentage of patients
Secondary

Patient Utilities

The average patient utilities (derived from EQ-5D) from baseline up to 2 years from the end of treatment will be described. Changes in patient utility will be analyzed using generalized estimated equations (GEE).

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Collected data were not considered valid due to software limitations as it was not available to auto-calculate the data as proposed by our EMR

Secondary

Probability of Locoregional or Distant Tumor Failure

The percentage of patients with locoregional or distant failure within 2 years of treatment will be estimated using cumulative incidence statistics, with death serving as the competing risk. Cumulative incidence refers to the estimated risk/probability of tumor failure within 2 years of treatment, either locoregional recurrence or distant metastasis, accounting for the competing risk of death.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiation TherapyProbability of Locoregional or Distant Tumor FailureLocoregional recurrence14 percentage of patients
Radiation TherapyProbability of Locoregional or Distant Tumor FailureDistant metastasis14 percentage of patients
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival will be calculated from the initiation of treatment. Progression is confirmed by biopsy, which will be used as the date of progression.

Time frame: 2 year

Population: Percentage of the total patient population with progression-free survival 2 years post treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiation TherapyProgression-free Survival79 percentage of patients
Secondary

Quality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)

Quality of life (QOL) patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for overall number of participants following treatment with elective volume and dose de-escalation, using European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EORTC HN35, which is specific to head and neck cancer, and composite MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 are scored on a 4-point categorical scale ranging from 1 not at all to 4 very much. This scale is then linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, where a higher score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents higher level functioning, a high score for quality of life represents a high quality of life, and a high score for a symptom scale represents worse symptoms. MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire: Possible score ranges from 0-100, with higher score indicating higher functioning.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 pain24.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)Composite MDADI81.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 sticky saliva15.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 global71.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 senses6.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 role fcn81.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 3
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 emotional fcn78.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 physical fcn90.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 speech18.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 cognitive fcn90.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 social fcn85.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Radiation TherapyQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 dry mouth14.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 physical fcn87.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 dry mouth59.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.1
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 emotional fcn87.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 senses25.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 pain16.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 sticky saliva38.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.4
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 global76.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 social fcn85.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.5
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 cognitive fcn89.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 role fcn82.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)Composite MDADI79.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 2
Total Cohort 3 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 speech13.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 sticky saliva27.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.4
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 global79.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 physical fcn90.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 role fcn85.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.6
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 emotional fcn82.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 cognitive fcn86.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.1
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 social fcn85.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 dry mouth47.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.5
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 senses20.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 pain14.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 speech19.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.5
Total Cohort 6 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)Composite MDADI76.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 social fcn90.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 cognitive fcn90.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 global85.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 pain7.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 emotional fcn88.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 role fcn95.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)Composite MDADI84.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 speech9.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 sticky saliva27.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.6
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 dry mouth38.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.2
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC QLQ30 physical fcn93.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Total Cohort 12 MonthQuality of Life (QOL) Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)EORTC HN35 senses15.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Secondary

Total Number of Participants With Gastrostomy Dependence

The prevalence of gastrostomy use up to 2 years will be described.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radiation TherapyTotal Number of Participants With Gastrostomy Dependence31 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026