Skip to content

Fast Track Surgery for Abdominal Surgery in Rwanda

Fast Track Surgery for Abdominal Surgery in Rwanda: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03067519
Enrollment
62
Registered
2017-03-01
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2017-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Elective Surgical Procedures

Brief summary

Fast Track Surgery (FTS) was started in colorectal surgery, but was later applied to other surgical fields. Core elements include epidural or regional anaesthesia, perioperative fluid management, minimally invasive surgical techniques, pain control, and early mobilization and feeding. Beneficial effects of FTS include reduced costs, early hospital discharge, and increased availability of hospital beds.The main aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of FTS in the Rwandan surgical setting and to demonstrate the benefits of FTS. it is study comparing the management of surgical patients using traditional management and fast track surgery. the study was done on patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery only

Detailed description

Fast track surgery (FTS) uses a multifaceted approach to reduce the stress response to surgery, thereby improving outcomes and decreasing length of hospital stay. The core elements of FTS include: epidural or regional anesthesia, peri-operative fluid management, minimally invasive techniques, optimal pain control, early initiation of oral feeding and early mobilization. The combination of these approaches has led to a significant reduction in complication rates, morbidity and mortality rates, duration of hospital stay and costs of hospitalization, and greatly improved postoperative recovery The main aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of FTS in the Rwandan surgical setting and to demonstrate the benefits of FTS. This randomized control trial was conducted in CHUK over a period of three months (October - December, 2015). For patients in the FTS arm, the study investigator would assess patients on a daily basis and work with the primary surgical team. The study investigator would prompt the primary surgical team for early feeding, mobilization, pain control and fluid management recommendations. Data were collected on variables including postoperative analgesia, mobilisation, resuming oral feeding, hospital stay and complications. The primary outcome was duration of postoperative hospital stay and secondary outcome was major complications.

Interventions

OTHERFast track surgery

early feeding and mobilization after surgery

Management per the primary surgeon

Sponsors

University of Rwanda
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patients were randomly put in group using sealed envelop.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients admitted for elective abdominal surgery

Exclusion criteria

* patients with comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists score greater than 2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
hospital staywithin 30 daysnumbers of days spent in hospital

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major complicationswithin 30 daysMajor complications were defined as: in-hospital death, intra-abdominal abscess, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and venous thromboembolism.

Countries

Rwanda

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026