Skip to content

Routine Or Selective Stress Testing After Revascularization: ROSSTAR Trial RCT Outline

Routine Or Selective Stress Testing After Revascularization: ROSSTAR Trial RCT Outline

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03067402
Acronym
ROSSTAR
Enrollment
1100
Registered
2017-03-01
Start date
2017-03-20
Completion date
2022-06-10
Last updated
2017-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Heart Disease

Keywords

Myocardial Infarction, Physiological Stress Test, Nuclear Image Perfusion, Angioplasty, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Angina, Ischemia

Brief summary

The ROSSTAR trial is a pragmatic trial that will directly compare the strategies of routine and selective stress imaging testing (with radionuclide imaging (RNI)) late after PCI or CABG in asymptomatic patients. The study will be a single center trial based at the Jewish General Hospital (JGH), a McGill University teaching hospital (Montreal, Quebec). A total of 1100 patients who are either \>5 years post-CABG or \>2 years post-PCI will be randomized. Half of the patients will be randomized to a routine RNI testing, and the other half to selective RNI testing.

Detailed description

There is no consensus in current guidelines regarding the role of stress imaging testing late after revascularization. The issue to be resolved by the trial is whether routine stress imaging testing (stress test with nuclear perfusion imaging) benefits patients late after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). What are the principal research questions to be addressed? 1. Is a strategy of routine stress imaging testing late after PCI or CABG associated with lower clinical event rates than a strategy of selective stress imaging testing? 2. Is a strategy of routine stress imaging testing late after PCI or CABG associated with better quality of life than a strategy of selective stress imaging testing? 3. What are the resources utilization associated with routine vs. selective stress imaging testing? What is the primary hypothesis? The primary hypothesis is that routine stress imaging testing late after PCI or CABG is associated with lower clinical event rates than a strategy of selective stress imaging testing.

Interventions

OTHERObservation

Patient receives standard observation i.e. only do a nuclear imaging stress test if symptoms present themselves over the course of 3 years

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNuclear Perfusion Imaging Stress Test

Patient receives routine nuclear image perfusion stress test

Sponsors

Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1.Patients who have undergone CABG or PCI. * 2.CABG surgery occurred \>5 years and PCI \>2 years prior to randomization. * 3.Patients must have had at least one SVG in the CABG group. * 4.Patients are asymptomatic or have minimal chronic anginal symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

* 1.Participation in a conflicting clinical study. * 2.RNI testing already planned or performed within the past 12 months. * 3.Unable to give informed consent. * 4.Contraindications to or inability to perform exercise treadmill testing or pharmacological testing. * 5.Medical condition with a prognosis of less than 3.25 years. * 6.Likely to be unavailable for follow-up. * 7.Unable to read and understand English or French.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combined index (i.e.if any are positive then index is positive)Yearly up to 3 years from date of randomizationMyocardial Infarction, Death,Urgent Hospitalization for Cardiac Reasons

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of LifeBaseline and yearly up to 3 years from date of randomizationDifference in scores between baseline and follow-up Seattle Angina Questionnaire

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resource UtilizationYearly up to 3 years from date of randomizationTotal number of hospital days for cardiac admissions, further invasive and non-invasive testing, and revascularization procedures

Contacts

Primary ContactDavid Iannuzzi, MSc
david.iannuzzi.ccomtl@ssss.gouv.qc.ca(514)340-8222

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026