Neck Pain
Conditions
Keywords
radiofrequency neurotomy, zygapophyseal joint
Brief summary
This is a single-center, double blind, sham-controlled randomized trial (N: 34) to assess the long term efficacy of RF neurotomy of cervical medial branches. Patients with chronic unilateral neck pain who are found eligible and achieve ≥50% pain relief of two predictive and comparative test blocks will be included in the trial in a primary analysis. We will further test whether a strict selection of ≥80% pain relief better predicts efficacious RF neurotomy compared with a less strict selection of ≥50% to \<80%. After 6 months sham-treated patients may also be offered active unblinded RF treatment. Demographic and clinical data will be recorded at baseline while primary and secondary outcome measurements are recollected after 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Primary outcome measurements include self-reported neck function (NDI) and pain relief after 6 months.
Detailed description
Chronic neck pain represents a common health problem. The mechanisms appear to be multifactorial. Researchers have suggested a disturbed interplay between the deep neck muscles and facet joints. In Europe and the US radiofrequency neurotomy has become a common treatment. The evidence base, however, is still insufficient. Thus, a double blind, sham-controlled, randomized, single-center trial is carried out. Based on current data and a single center study design, 34 randomized participants, completing the trial, have shown adequate to obtain sufficient statistical power. To simplify the data collection a digital internet based program is used. Patients with chronic unilateral neck pain, referred to Oslo University Hospital or responding to public announcements, and not responding to non-interventional treatment will be screened. Those who are found eligible and achieve ≥50% pain relief after predictive and comparative test blocks, will be included in the study. We will further test whether a strict selection of ≥80% pain relief better predicts efficacious RF neurotomy compared with a less strict selection of ≥50% to \<80%. After 6 months participants who received sham and still suffer from neck pain, will be offered unblinded RF neurotomy and additional 12 month unblinded follow up if the results support this treatment. Demographic and clinical data will be recorded at baseline. The primary and secondary outcome measurements are recollected after 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Primary outcome measurements include self-reported neck function (NDI) and pain relief after 6 months. Regression analyses will be used to identify how pain relief of two test blocks and pain catastrophizing predict response to RF neurotomy. If RF neurotomy is found superior to sham treatment, this may be implemented in the national treatment program for selected patients with chronic neck pain.
Interventions
PROCEDURERadiofrequency neurotomy
RF neurotomy represents a nerve destructive, coagulating technique affecting the conduction through all nerve fibers.
PROCEDURESham treatment
Sham treatment represents no coagulation of the nerve and will not affect the nerve conduction.
Sponsors
St. Olavs Hospital
Oslo University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Min 18 years and Maximum 80 years * Read and understand Norwegian * Stable neck pain \>12 months, with or without unilateral headache * Average of worst pain intensity last three days ≥ 4 out of maximum 10 * Neck Disability Index \>15 points or \> 30 percentage points. * At least two predictive blocks ≥ 50% pain relief 30 to 60 minutes after lidocaine and 30 to 180 minutes after bupivacaine .
Exclusion criteria
* Serious cervical pathology (acute cervical disc herniation, radiculopathy, myelopathy, spinal anomalies and chronic widespread pain * Opioid consumption \> 50 morphine equivalents/day * Ongoing litigation process and applying for disability insurance/benefits * Serious psychiatric disorder (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosed at a psychiatric unit, including suicidal thoughts and somatization (from Hopkins Symptom Check List 25 ≥ 2.5) * Ongoing addictive behavior ( diagnostic criteria in Statistical Manual, 4th Edition) * Unstable medical condition (ASA 4, serious vascular disease like unstable angina) * Bacterial infection * Malignancy * Chronic generalized pain * Hypersensitive to contrast agents or local anesthetics * Pregnancy * Bleeding diathesis * Previously radiofrequency neurotomy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in neck function after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment | 6 months | Two independent group comparison of change of Neck Disability Index scores -continuous variable 0-50) |
| Change in pain intensity (numeric pain scale) after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment | 6 months | Two independent group comparison of change in pain intensity (triplicate values from three consecutive days on a numeric pain scale 0-10 which provides a continuous variable) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in pain intensity (categorical pain scale) after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment | 1 month | Two independent group comparison of change in pain intensity (categorical 6-point pain scale with the alternatives worse, unchanged, \<50% reduced, ≥50% reduced, and pain free which provides a categorial variable) |
| Change in health related quality of life after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment | 6 months | Two independent group comparison of change of EuroQuol-5-Dimensions Index scores (continuous variable from -0.59 to 1.00) |
| Change in drug consumption after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment | 6 months | Two independent group comparison of change of the numbers of analgesic drugs (continuous variable) |
| Change in number of neck/pain treatments after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment | 6 months | Two independent group comparison of change of the numbers of neck/pain treatments (continuous variable) |
| How highly positive response to test block influences neck function after RF treatment | 6 months | Regression analysis on how ≥80% pain relief (independent categorical variable) predicts \>15% reduction of Neck disability Score (categorical variable) after RF neurotomy |
| How moderately positive response to test block influences neck function after RF treatment | 6 months | Regression analysis on how ≥50% and \<80% pain relief (independent categorical variable) predicts \>15% reduction of Neck disability Score (categorical variable) after RF neurotomy |
| How highly positive response to test block influences 30% pain relief after RF treatment | 6 months | Regression analysis on how ≥80% pain relief (independent categorical variable) predicts \>30% reduction in pain intensity (categorical variable) after RF neurotomy |
| Change in neck function after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment | 12 months | Two independent group comparison of change of Neck Disability Index scores -continuous variable 0-50 |
| How highly positive response to test block influences 50% pain relief after RF treatment | 6 months | Regression analysis on how ≥80% pain relief (independent categorical variable) predicts \>50% reduction in pain intensity (categorical variable) after RF neurotomy |
| How moderately positive response to test block influences 50% pain relief after RF treatment | 6 months | Regression analysis on how ≥50 and \<80% pain relief (independent categorical variable) predicts \>50% reduction in pain intensity (categorical variable) after RF neurotomy |
| How catastrophizing influences neck function after RF treatment. | 6 months | Regression analysis on how Pain Catastrophizing Scale score ≥30 (independent categorical variable) predict ≥ 15% reduction of Neck Disability Score (categorical variable) after RF neurotomy vs Pain Catastrophizing Scale score \< 30 |
| How catastrophizing influences pain relief after RF treatment. | 6 months | Regression analysis on how Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores ≥30 (independent categorical variable) predict \>30% reduction in pain intensity (categorical variable) after RF neurotomy vs Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores \< 30 |
| Change in mental distress after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment. | 6 months | Two independent group comparison of change in Hopkin Symptom Check List (HSCL 25) sumscore which is a continuous variable on anxiety and depressive symptoms, ranging from 1 (normal) to 4 (worse) |
| Change in sleep disturbances after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment. | 6 months | Two independent group comparison of change in sleep. Sleep Subscale in Neck Disability Index part 7. A continuous variable based on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 to 6 where 0 is no problem and 6 i severe insomnia. |
| How moderately positive response to test block influences 30% pain relief after RF treatment | 6 months | Regression analysis on how ≥50% and \<80% pain relief (independent categorical variable) predicts \>30% reduction in pain intensity (categorical variable) after RF neurotomy |
| Change in pain intensity (numeric pain scale) after RF neurotomy vs sham treatment | 1 month | Two independent group comparison of change in pain intensity (triplicate values from three consecutive days on a numeric pain scale 0-10 which provides a continuous variable) |
Countries
Norway
Contacts
Primary ContactGunnvald Kvarstein, Dr. Med
Backup ContactBård Lundeland, PhD
Outcome results
None listed