Skip to content

Effect of Ultra-low Dose Naloxone on Remifentanil-Induced Hyperalgesia

Effect of Ultra-low Dose Naloxone on Remifentanil-Induced Hyperalgesia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03066739
Enrollment
8
Registered
2017-02-28
Start date
2023-02-25
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperalgesia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether using ultra-low dose naloxone, an opioid antagonist, has the potential to block remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance following surgery. There are 3 study groups: (1) low dose remifentanil (LO, 0.1 micrograms/kg/mL), (2) high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with placebo (HI, 0.4 micrograms/kg/mL), or (3) high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with ultra-low dose naloxone (HN, 0.004 micrograms/kg/mL naloxone). The hypothesis of the study is that occurrence of remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (low score in mechanical pain threshold) in the HN group will be lower than in the HI group.

Detailed description

Purpose: Opioid antagonists at ultra-low doses have been used with opioid agonists to prevent or limit opioid tolerance. Remifentanil, a rapid onset/offset opioid that is often used as an anesthesia adjunct intraoperatively, has been associated with the development of hyperalgesia and opioid tolerance postoperatively. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) induced by remifentanil intraoperatively may be a factor contributing to an increase in postoperative pain as well as difficulty in controlling such pain. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate whether an ultra-low dose of naloxone, an opioid antagonist, could block remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance following surgery. This research will help elucidate the degree of OIH after surgeries involving remifentanil and determine if a new technique can be employed to decrease remifentanil-induced OIH. By mitigating OIH, patients should have a decrease in postoperative pain and an increase in patient satisfaction at UCI and other hospitals where such a technique is employed. There are 3 study groups: (1) low dose remifentanil (LO, 0.1 micrograms/kg/mL), (2) high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with placebo (HI, 0.4 micrograms/kg/mL), or (3) high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with ultra-low dose naloxone (HN, 0.004 micrograms/kg/mL naloxone). Background: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia is a paradoxical increase in pain sensitivity following opioid exposure. The mechanism for this is likely due to an alteration in opioid receptor signaling with disruption of G-protein coupling and opioid-induced activation and hypertrophy of spinal glial cells (gliosis). Opioid-induced hyperalgesia has been noted with many different opioids, and the most well documented hyperalgesic effect is with remifentanil. Various agents have been used in an attempt to reduce the development hyperalgesia following remifentanil. While there are few reports on the effect of ultra-low dose naloxone on opioid-induced hyperalgesia, recent evidence is emerging regarding its use in pain management. Ultra-low dose naloxone has been shown to prevent remifentanil-induced pain hypersensitivities (allodynia and hyperalgesia) in rats. However, there are little to no studies on reducing the adverse effects of remifentanil with naloxone in human subjects. Existing knowledge and previous research: Attempts have been made with various agents to reduce the development of tolerance and hyperalgesia following remifentanil. Postoperative hyperalgesia and its prevention has been studied with ketamine , Magnesium , Gabapentin, Clonidine, Lornoxicam , Dextromethorphan , Paracetamol , Morphine , Dexmedetomidine , Adenosine, COX inhibitors , Amantadine , Nitrous oxide, Fentanyl, Pregabalin , Buprenorphine, Midazolam, Dexamethasone. Relevant to our current hypothesis is the report that concomitant administration of ultra-low dose naloxone and naltrexone with remifentanil prevented OIH. However, there are no studies on reducing the adverse effects of remifentanil with ultra-low dose naloxone in human subjects. While the traditional role of opiate antagonists have been in cases of opioid overmedication, recent evidence is emerging regarding their use in pain management. Gan et al. 1997 used an ultra-low dose naloxone infusion (0.00025 mg/kg/h or 0.001 mg/kg/h) in postoperative patients receiving IV morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Good pain relief was experienced in all groups, however consumption of PCA morphine was significantly reduced in patients that received the lowest infusion of naloxone and opioid-induced side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were reduced by naloxone at both dose. Naloxone and/or naltrexone at ultra-low doses may enhance the analgesic effects of opioids, enhance the antinociceptive effects of methadone, and decrease or block the development of opioid tolerance in rodents. The combination of oxycodone with an ultra-low dose of the antagonist naltrexone as a singular oral medication, Oxytrex, has been developed to prevent the development of tolerance in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain. Aguado et. al. 2013 recently evaluated the effects of the opioid antagonist, naloxone, on remifentanil-induced tolerance or hyperalgesia in rats. Hyperalgesia was considered to be a decrease in mechanical nociceptive thresholds (von Frey), while opioid tolerance was considered to be a decrease in sevoflurane MAC reduction by remifentanil. An ultra-low dose of naloxone was able to block remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and the MAC increase associated with hyperalgesia, but did not change opioid tolerance under inhaled anesthesia.

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanil

0.1 micrograms/kg/mL

DRUGRemifentanil+ Placebo

high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with placebo (HI, 0.4 micrograms/kg/mL)

DRUGRemifentanil +ultra-low dose naloxone

high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with ultra-low dose naloxone (HN, 0.004 micrograms/kg/mL naloxone

Sponsors

University of California, Irvine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who provide written informed consent. * Age 18 years old or older (no upper age limit for inclusion) * Gender: male or female. * Surgery: Posterior spinal fusions

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to opiates * Chronic pain other than the primary indication for surgery * Psychiatric illness * History of substance abuse problem including alcohol \&/or cannabis * BMI \> 35 * Subjects under 18 years of age. * Subject without the capacity to give written informed consent. 8. Female subjects who are pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occurrence of Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia (OIH)24 hr Post-surgeryMechanical Pain Threshold-determined by von Frey filaments around the incision site. The force required to elicit a pain response was recorded in grams. Higher values indicate higher pain thresholds (i.e., less hyperalgesia), while lower values indicate greater pain sensitivity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid Consumption24 hr post surgeryOpioid consumption required to control pain by Oral morphine equivalents
Cold Pressure Test24 hr post surgeryPain threshold and pain tolerance were assessed using the Cold Pressor Test. Pain threshold was defined as the time to first pain sensation, and pain tolerance as the total duration the participant kept the hand immersed in cold water. Time was recorded in seconds. Higher values indicate greater pain tolerance and lower pain sensitivity.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresBaseline, 4, 8 and 12h after extubation and again at 24h and 48h post-operativelyVisual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores are measured tp represent the severity of symptoms from 0 "no symptoms" to 10 "very severe symptoms." Its use is standard-of-care and is measured prior to surgery and at 4, 8 and 12h after extubation and again at 24h and 48h post-operatively.
McGill Short Form QuestionnaireBaselineThe Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Total Score (SF-MPQ PRI-T) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing pain quality and intensity. The total score (PRI-T) is calculated by summing the 11 sensory descriptor scores (range 0-33) and the 4 affective descriptor scores (range 0-12), resulting in a total score range of 0-45. Each descriptor is rated on a 4-point intensity scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Higher scores indicate worse pain outcomes, and lower scores indicate less pain.
Brief Pain Inventory - Average Pain SeverityBaselineBrief Pain Inventory assesses both pain intensity and pain unpleasantness (the emotional component of pain is considered to be a better metric of subject satisfaction and quality of life).Average pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Participants rated their average pain during the past 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAriana Nelson, MD

Associate Clinical Professor

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 8 participants were enrolled. Six completed all study procedures. Two participants did not complete the study.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
Age, Continuous66.83 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41
Cold Pressor Pain Threshold100 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10 / 10 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10 / 11 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 10 / 4

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026