Skip to content

Promoting Asthma Guidelines and Management Through Technology-Based Intervention and Care Coordination

Promoting Asthma Guidelines and Management Through Technology-Based Intervention and Care Coordination

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03066596
Acronym
PRAGMATIC
Enrollment
530
Registered
2017-02-28
Start date
2017-03-07
Completion date
2024-08-24
Last updated
2025-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma Childhood

Brief summary

The overall goal of this research study is to test the effectiveness of a multifaceted and multi-level prompting intervention in a real world urban primary care office setting on improving provider-delivered guideline-based asthma care and reducing asthma morbidity among urban children with persistent or uncontrolled asthma.

Detailed description

Investigators will conduct a cluster randomized trial comparing the intervention to enhanced usual care (eUC) in 20 Bronx practices serving over 5,000 children ages 2-12 years with persistent or uncontrolled asthma. Eleven eUC practices will receive guideline information and assess children's asthma severity and control, but active intervention components will not be provided. Practices will join the study in 4 waves over 4 years (4-6 practices per year). Provider adoption of guidelines and utilization of care in all patients (\ 5,000) ages 2-12 years with persistent or uncontrolled asthma from intervention and eUC practices will be evaluated using Electronic Health Records (EHR) data and practice-based screening for asthma severity and control. Investigators will also enroll a random subset of 512 caregivers of children with persistent/uncontrolled asthma from both study arms to systematically evaluate caregiver-reported child morbidity outcomes and obtain measures not available in EHR. Intervention consists of academic detailing in the EHR that follow national asthma guidelines and outreach worker care coordination for patients with persistent or uncontrolled asthma. Comment: While caregivers reported on child outcomes, caregivers were not subjects of the study. See Pre-Assignment Details section within the Participant Flow module for more details.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALeMPI

The core elements of the multilevel strategy for implementation include: Direct Support for Providers' Delivery of Guideline-Based Care in Practice; Enhancements to Increase the Feasibility and Sustainability of eMPI; Involving Clinic Staff in Promoting and Supporting Use of Guidelines; Building Accountability and Commitment to Guideline-Based Care; Promoting Providers' Understanding, Acceptance, and Use of Guidelines

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Follow up assessments will be collected by blinded interviewers

Intervention model description

Cluster randomized design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The criteria listed below will apply to \ 5,000 children from eMPI and eUC practices: * Physician-diagnosed asthma (based on EHR) * Persistent or uncontrolled asthma as per clinic assessment. Based on NHLBI guidelines, any one of the following: in past month, \> 2 days/week with asthma symptoms, \>2 days/week with rescue medication use, \>2 days/month with nighttime symptoms, or \> 2 episodes in the past year that required systemic corticosteroids * Age 2 and 12 years, inclusive Additional inclusion criteria will apply to a subset of 512 of children whose caregivers will be interviewed to obtain caregiver-reported morbidity outcomes: * Caregiver is able to speak and understand either English or Spanish. Participants unable to read will be eligible as all surveys will be administered verbally by research personnel * Consent from the primary caregiver, caregiver permission for the child to participate as well as assent from the child (\>7 years). If there are eligible siblings, only one child will be randomly selected

Exclusion criteria

* The child has other significant medical conditions, such as congenital heart disease, cystic fibrosis, or other chronic lung disease, that could interfere with the assessment of asthma-related measures Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With 1 or More Guideline-based Corrective Actions TakenImmediately post-intervention, up to 1 yearThe percentage of participants with 1 or more guideline-based corrective actions taken (i.e., controller medication prescription or adjustment, trigger evaluation), as recorded in the electronic health record (EHR) is reported. Results are summarized in number/percentage of participants with 1 or more guideline-based corrective actions taken by study arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Free Days (SFDs)Baseline, and 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, and 12 month follow-up evaluationsThe number of days without symptoms during the past 14 days is summarized by study arm at baseline and every 3 months up through the 12 month follow up evaluation.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ)every 3 months up to 12 monthscaregiver asthma related quality of life
Health Care Utilization: Number of ED Visits for Asthmaevery 3 months up to 12 monthsnumber of ED visits for asthma
Health Care Utilization: Number Hospitalizations for Asthmaevery 3 months up to 12 monthsnumber hospitalizations for asthma

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Because children with asthma (ages 2-12) were the subjects of the study, caregivers had to complete validated surveys/questionnaires in order to collect child-specific data and outcome measures about their child's asthma. The study was exclusively for children with asthma. Parents were not subjects in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enhanced Multifaceted Prompting Intervention (eMPI)
The enhanced MPI program (eMPI) consists of innovative multi-level and team-based strategies to enable providers to effectively and efficiently adopt asthma care guidelines. eMPI uses guideline-based prompts at the time of an office visit to support providers' decision-making, increasing the likelihood that they will recommend corrective actions (i.e., preventive medication prescription) to improve asthma management. eMPI: The core elements of the multilevel strategy for implementation include: Direct Support for Providers' Delivery of Guideline-Based Care in Practice; Enhancements to Increase the Feasibility and Sustainability of eMPI; Involving Clinic Staff in Promoting and Supporting Use of Guidelines; Building Accountability and Commitment to Guideline-Based Care; Promoting Providers' Understanding, Acceptance, and Use of Guidelines
265
Enhanced Usual Care (eUC) Practices
Participants will receive a review packet of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines and educational resources for families. Children will be assessed for asthma severity and level of control at each visit as part of best-practice care, but active intervention components will not be provided.
265
Total530

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1410
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnhanced Multifaceted Prompting Intervention (eMPI)TotalEnhanced Usual Care (eUC) Practices
Age, Continuous6.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.75
6.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.84
6.68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.94
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
184 Participants364 Participants180 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
79 Participants163 Participants84 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
103 Participants210 Participants107 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
46 Participants102 Participants56 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
82 Participants157 Participants75 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants53 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
265 participants530 participants265 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
109 Participants204 Participants95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
156 Participants326 Participants170 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2650 / 265
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2650 / 265
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2650 / 265

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With 1 or More Guideline-based Corrective Actions Taken

The percentage of participants with 1 or more guideline-based corrective actions taken (i.e., controller medication prescription or adjustment, trigger evaluation), as recorded in the electronic health record (EHR) is reported. Results are summarized in number/percentage of participants with 1 or more guideline-based corrective actions taken by study arm.

Time frame: Immediately post-intervention, up to 1 year

Population: All randomized subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Multifaceted Prompting Intervention (eMPI)Percentage of Participants With 1 or More Guideline-based Corrective Actions Taken241 Participants
Enhanced Usual Care (eUC) PracticesPercentage of Participants With 1 or More Guideline-based Corrective Actions Taken197 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.98, 6.08]GLM with GEE
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.97, 6.82]GLM with GEE
Secondary

Symptom Free Days (SFDs)

The number of days without symptoms during the past 14 days is summarized by study arm at baseline and every 3 months up through the 12 month follow up evaluation.

Time frame: Baseline, and 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, and 12 month follow-up evaluations

Population: The number of participants analyzed at each timepoint for both arms is depicted in the table below.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Multifaceted Prompting Intervention (eMPI)Symptom Free Days (SFDs)3 month9.33 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.95
Enhanced Multifaceted Prompting Intervention (eMPI)Symptom Free Days (SFDs)12 month10.53 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.16
Enhanced Multifaceted Prompting Intervention (eMPI)Symptom Free Days (SFDs)6 month9.68 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.52
Enhanced Multifaceted Prompting Intervention (eMPI)Symptom Free Days (SFDs)9 month10.07 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.37
Enhanced Multifaceted Prompting Intervention (eMPI)Symptom Free Days (SFDs)Baseline5.79 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.7
Enhanced Usual Care (eUC) PracticesSymptom Free Days (SFDs)9 month10.78 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.36
Enhanced Usual Care (eUC) PracticesSymptom Free Days (SFDs)Baseline6.41 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.72
Enhanced Usual Care (eUC) PracticesSymptom Free Days (SFDs)3 month9.17 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.82
Enhanced Usual Care (eUC) PracticesSymptom Free Days (SFDs)6 month10.33 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.06
Enhanced Usual Care (eUC) PracticesSymptom Free Days (SFDs)12 month10.44 number of symptom free daysStandard Deviation 4.49
Comparison: 3 month follow upp-value: 0.17495% CI: [0.95, 1.34]GLM with GEE
Comparison: 6 month follow upp-value: 0.74195% CI: [0.85, 1.27]GLM with GEE
Comparison: 9 month follow upp-value: 0.72495% CI: [0.85, 1.25]GLM with GEE
Comparison: 12 month follow upp-value: 0.22995% CI: [0.93, 1.34]GLM with GEE
Comparison: 3 month follow upp-value: 0.18695% CI: [0.94, 1.34]GLM with GEE
Comparison: 6 month follow upp-value: 0.74495% CI: [0.84, 1.27]GLM with GEE
Comparison: 9 month follow upp-value: 0.76595% CI: [0.85, 1.25]GLM with GEE
Comparison: 12 month follow upp-value: 0.24195% CI: [0.93, 1.33]GLM with GEE
Other Pre-specified

Health Care Utilization: Number Hospitalizations for Asthma

number hospitalizations for asthma

Time frame: every 3 months up to 12 months

Other Pre-specified

Health Care Utilization: Number of ED Visits for Asthma

number of ED visits for asthma

Time frame: every 3 months up to 12 months

Other Pre-specified

Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ)

caregiver asthma related quality of life

Time frame: every 3 months up to 12 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026