Skip to content

A Comparison of Epidural Techniques for Labour Analgesia

A Comparison of Epidural Techniques for Labour Analgesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03065569
Enrollment
150
Registered
2017-02-28
Start date
2017-05-07
Completion date
2018-05-07
Last updated
2018-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labour Analgesia

Brief summary

A trial comparing outcomes for different epidural techniques in labour analgesia

Detailed description

Epidurals are the most common form of pain relief in labour. There are two techniques in use at the moment to place the epidural: epidural or combined spinal epidural (CSE). CSE has been shown to work faster and provide better pain relief than epidural alone. The investigators aim to show that CSE also requires less medication over the course of labour as this may mean it has fewer side effects. The amount of medication needed during labour between the two different techniques given in a standardized way will be compared.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacaine

16 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy, singleton presentation at term

Exclusion criteria

* Significant comorbidities likely to alter outcome of labour

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bupivacaine requirement for analgesiaFrom randomization until deliverymilligram of bupivacaine used per hour

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026