Skip to content

The Use of Alloderm Versus Dermacell in Immediate Implant Based Breast Reconstruction

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Use of Alloderm Versus Dermacell in Immediate Implant Based Breast Reconstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03064893
Acronym
REaCT-ADM
Enrollment
62
Registered
2017-02-27
Start date
2017-02-06
Completion date
2019-02-19
Last updated
2026-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Reconstruction

Keywords

acellular dermal matrix, mastectomy, breast reconstruction

Brief summary

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy has been shown to provide psychosocial benefits to breast cancer patients and is considered an integral part of breast cancer treatment. In general, breast reconstruction can be accomplished using the patients own tissues or implantable prosthetic devices. Various acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are offered on the market and the costs vary widely despite very similar qualities. The two most commonly used ADM products in North America by far are Dermacell and Alloderm. The difference between the two products include a) level of sterility, with Dermacell being sterilized to 10-9 while Alloderm is sterilized to 10-6 and b) the consistency and thickness of the biologic material and c) a significant different in cost ($2200 CAD vs $3600, respectively). Each product has shown to be safe and effective. As such, clinical equipoise exists. This will be a pragmatic trial to evaluate Dermacell with Alloderm in a head to head randomized fashion, with regards to the postoperative complications, namely infection, seroma formation (as measured by drain duration and output), loss of implant, incidence of revisional surgery and capsular contracture.

Interventions

DEVICEAlloderm

Reconstruction material

DEVICEDermacell

Reconstruction material

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patient * Ages 20-90 * All patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer or prophylaxis for breast cancer with immediate implant-based reconstruction * Able to provide verbal consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have had prior chest wall or irradiation on the reconstructed side * Patients not undergoing immediate breast reconstruction at the time of mastectomy * Any patient with a contraindication to immediate breast reconstruction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Duration of Drain Placementswithin 6 months of initial surgeryPostoperative duration of drain placements for each postoperative breast.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Breasts With an Episode of Seroma Formation Requiring Aspirationwithin 6 months of initial surgery
Number of Breasts With Loss of Implantwithin 6 months of initial surgery
Number of Breasts With Events of Revisional Surgery/ Return to Operating Roomwithin 6 months of initial surgery
Number of Breasts With Wound Dehiscence or Debridementwithin 6 months of initial surgeryWound dehiscence is a post-operative complication. Wound debridement is a procedure. This outcome was collected on a post-surgery case report form.
Number of Breasts With Capsular Contracture (as Identified by the Plastic Surgeon)within 6 months of initial surgeryCapsular contracture is a post-operative complication identified by the plastic surgeon. This outcome was collected on a post-surgery case report form.
Number of Plastic Surgeon Visitswithin 6 months of initial surgery
Economics of Total Costs2 yearsEconomic impact will be assessed based on calculation of total costs with each material used to include the material costs, duration of operative room use, clinic and inpatient hospital costs, surgical billing costs and anaesthesia costs

Countries

Canada

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAngel Arnaout, MD

The Ottawa Hospital

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
Smoking history
Current
4 Participants
Smoking history
Never
19 Participants
Smoking history
Prior (>1 or equal to month before)
19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 310 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026