Comparison of Laparoscopic Cornuostomy and Wedge Resection for Interstitial Pregnancy

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03064594

Enrollment

Registered

2017-02-27

Start date

2017-02-09

Completion date

2018-11-02

Last updated

2019-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cornual Pregnancy

Brief summary

This retrospective study is to find out the best way to treat patient with cornual pregnancy in the aspect of further pregnancy outcome.

Detailed description

To find out the best way to treat patient with cornual pregnancy in the aspect of further pregnancy outcome, the investigators compared the outcomes of laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) and laparoscopic cornuostomy (LC) by the retrospective chart review.

Interventions

PROCEDURECornual pregnancy

we will get the information of operative time, blood loss and postoperative pregnancy and delivery rate.

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

20 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* All women with cornual pregnancy who were admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital for laparoscopic surgeries between January 2008 and June 2016 were enrolled

Exclusion criteria

* The person who was pregnant at the time of the operation * After receiving IVF course of treatment * Patients with uterine horns undergoing open surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
pregnancy rate	9 years	Comparison of pregnancy rates between the cornuostomy and wedge resection groups

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026