Skip to content

Intraoral Imaging at Clinical Crown Lengthening

The Use of Intraoral Imaging at Clinical Crown Lengthening Procedures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03064217
Enrollment
20
Registered
2017-02-24
Start date
2017-05-25
Completion date
2021-12-30
Last updated
2025-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries of Root Surface, Surgery

Keywords

Clinical crown lengthening, intraoral imaging, Emax crown

Brief summary

Crown lengthening surgery is done when a tooth needs to be fixed with a crown. Sometimes, not enough of the tooth sticks out above the gum to support a crown. This can happen when a tooth breaks off at the gum line, or when a crown or filling falls out of a tooth and there is decay underneath. To place a crown, the dentist needs to expose more of the tooth. This is done by removing some gum tissue or bone. After surgery, the area will heal in about three months. Then, making a crown can begin. This healing period often delays the delivery a final crown. This study is investing a way to make the final impression at the surgery to expedite the delivery of a final crown.

Detailed description

The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes of single unsplinted fixed restorations made with digital intraoral imaging in conjunction with clinical crown lengthening procedures (CLPs) compared ones fabricated by the conventional protocol. Specific Aim 1: To evaluate the clinical outcomes between the experimental group (the digital impression taking at clinical crown lengthening procedures) and the control group (the conventional protocol) Hypothesis: There will be no differences in clinical parameters around the teeth between the two groups. Approach: The investigators will conduct a prospective clinical study and will compare the changes in gingival recession, the width of keratinized gingiva, and pocket depths around the teeth between the two groups. Specific Aim 2: To evaluate the radiographic outcome between the experimental group and the control group Hypothesis: There will be no difference in crestal bone level around teeth between the two groups. Approach: The study will investigate the difference in crestal bone level around the teeth at baseline and 12 months between the two groups.

Interventions

DEVICEMaking impression at surgery

Making impression at surgery

Sponsors

University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age \>18 years * a single-unsplinted crown needed * the tooth must be in the area from the canine to the second molars * a clinical crown lengthening is required to fabricate a crown

Exclusion criteria

* uncontrolled hypertension * diabetes mellitus * subjects with a history of a long-term use of corticosteroid (\> 6 months) * subjects with a history of taking oral/IV bisphosphonates within the past 2 years * smokers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pocket Depth12 monthsChanges in pocket depths (the distance from the gingival margin to pocket base) at 12 months from the baseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Making Impression at Surgery
Making impression at surgery Making impression at surgery: Making impression at surgery
10
Making Impression at Surgery
Making impression at surgery Making impression at surgery: Making impression at surgery
10
Making Impression 8 Weeks After Surgery
Making the final impression 8 weeks after surgery
10
Making Impression 8 Weeks After Surgery
Making the final impression 8 weeks after surgery
10
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMaking Impression at SurgeryMaking Impression 8 Weeks After SurgeryTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants9 Participants14 Participants
Age, Continuous55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
Crestal bone loss1.78 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
1.14 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
1.6 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants10 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Pocket Depth

Changes in pocket depths (the distance from the gingival margin to pocket base) at 12 months from the baseline

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Making Impression at SurgeryPocket Depth2.7 mmStandard Deviation 1.2
Making Impression 8 Weeks After SurgeryPocket Depth2.4 mmStandard Deviation 1
p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026