Skip to content

Laser Enucleation of Prostate (LEP) Versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP)

Laser Enucleation of Prostate (LEP) Versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP): a Prospective Study Comparing Outcomes

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03062111
Enrollment
3
Registered
2017-02-23
Start date
2017-10-23
Completion date
2021-01-15
Last updated
2021-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Keywords

Laser Enucleation of Prostate (LEP), Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP)

Brief summary

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) refers to the proliferation of smooth muscle and epithelial cells of the prostate gland. The enlarged gland has the potential to result in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to either bladder outlet obstruction or increased muscle tone and resistance, or both. For decades transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic BPH that is refractory to nonoperative management. This is a surgical intervention aimed to reduce the size of the prostate gland. However, over the past fifteen years, many alternative therapies have been introduced including laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP). LEP has numerous advantages including decreased blood loss and length of hospital stay as well as increased effectiveness and safety for large prostate gland sizes (\>80g).

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of TURP to LEP using the ProTouch laser technology. While TURP has historically been the gold standard, LEP has become more widespread and is arguably a safer and more effective therapy for the patient. TURP is still widely performed because it is a traditional therapy with decades of data to support its efficacy, despite higher volume of blood loss and risk for TUR syndrome. In comparison, there is some data demonstrating that Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate can have similar efficacy but may have longer operative times. The ProTouch laser is comparable to the Holmium laser but additionally provides improved hemostasis and tissue vaporization. There is little to no data comparing LEP with the ProTouch laser to TURP. This study will directly compare the efficacy of these two treatment methods by enrolling eligible subjects and comparing outcomes.

Interventions

PROCEDUREProTouch Laser Enucleation of Prostate (LEP)

Laser enucleation of the prostate is a standard form of treatment for BPH used widely. The ProTouch laser is established to be safe and is newer than the holmium laser.

TURP has been considered a gold standard for treatment of BPH in which rigid resectoscopes with bipolar cautery are used to endoscopically resect prostatic tissue.

Sponsors

Boston University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male * Age \> 50-80 years * Prostate gland size 50-100g * Failure of nonoperative therapy * IPSS 8+ * FR \<15ml/s * PVR \<250 * If PVR is 250-400 then pre-operative urodynamics will be indicated * Language: English, Spanish, Haitian Creole, French, Portuguese * Willing to randomize

Exclusion criteria

* Neurogenic bladder * PVR \>400ml * IPSS \<8 * FR \>15ml/Indwelling catheter \- History of prostate cancer * History of urethral stricture or vesicourethral anastomotic stricture * Unable to be placed in lithotomy position * Unable to undergo general or spinal anesthesia * Unable to consent * Untreated or uncorrected coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Urinary Flow RateFrom time of randomization and ultimately at 24 monthsVelocity (in cc/sec) of the urine flow

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life scoreFrom time of randomization and ultimately at 24 monthsSurvey to determine how satisfied the patient is with urination
Blood lossDuring surgery (full length of operative time)Amount of blood loss during surgery.
Catheter timeFrom time of surgery to up to 3 weeks after surgery.the amount of time a catheter must stay in place postoperatively
Post void residualFrom time of randomization and ultimately at 24 monthsAmount of urine remaining in the bladder after voiding
Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM)From time of randomization and ultimately at 24 monthsSurvey to assess baseline sexual function and whether this is affected by intervention type

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026