Skip to content

Saroglitazar Magnesium in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and/or Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

A Phase 2, Prospective, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Study of Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mg, 2 mg or 4 mg Versus Placebo in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and/or Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03061721
Acronym
EVIDENCES IV
Enrollment
106
Registered
2017-02-23
Start date
2017-04-06
Completion date
2019-08-22
Last updated
2024-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Keywords

NASH, NAFLD, Saroglitazar

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in up to 104 patients with a diagnosis of Non-alcoholic fatty Liver disease (NAFLD) and/or Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The study will be conducted over a period of up to 22 weeks and will include an optional Prescreening, Screening (Days -35 to -7) Phase, a 16-week Treatment Phase following randomization on Day 1. Patients will be randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 to receive Saroglitazar Magnesium 1mg or 2 mg or 4 mg or matching placebo once daily in the morning before breakfast for 16 Weeks. The primary endpoint of the study is percentage change from baseline in serum Alanine transaminase (ALT) levels at Week 16 in the Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group.

Interventions

Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar magnesium 1 mg tablet orally once daily for 16 weeks.

Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar magnesium 2 mg tablet orally once daily for 16 weeks.

Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar magnesium 4 mg tablet orally once daily for 16 weeks.

DRUGPlacebos

Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive placebo tablet orally once daily for 16 weeks.

Sponsors

Zydus Therapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or females, 18 to 75 years of age, with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m\^2. 2. Documented diagnosis of NAFLD established either by imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography \[CT\] scan or Magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) or liver biopsy showing NASH or simple steatosis, within the 24 months preceding Visit 1. The diagnosis of NAFLD is made according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria (Chalasani et al. Hepatology 2012; 55:2005-2023). 3. ALT level of ≥50 U/L at Visit 1 and Visit 2 with ≤30% variance between the levels at Visit 1 and Visit 2. 4. Patient's demonstration of understanding of study requirements and treatment procedures, willingness to comply with all protocol-required evaluations; provision of written informed consent before any study specific tests or procedures are performed.

Exclusion criteria

1. Consumption of \> 3 units of alcohol per day (\> 21 units per week) if male and \> 2 units of alcohol per day (\>14 units per week) if female for at least 3 consecutive months in the 5 years preceding Visit 1 (Note: 1 unit = 12 ounces of beer, 4 ounces of wine or 1 ounce of spirits/hard liquor). 2. Presence of alternative causes of fatty liver, including: 1. Weight change \>5% within the 3 months preceding Visit 1 2. Total parenteral nutrition, starvation or protein-calorie malnutrition within the 90 days preceding Visit 1. 3. Use of drugs associated with NAFLD for more than 12 consecutive weeks in the 1 year before Visit 1, including amiodarone, tamoxifen, methotrexate, systemic glucocorticoids, anabolic steroids, tetracycline, estrogens in doses higher than used in oral contraceptives, vitamin A, L asparaginase, valproate, chloroquine or antiretroviral drugs 3. Initiation of vitamin E at doses \> 100 IU/day, or multivitamins containing \> 100 IU/day of vitamin E in the 3 months preceding Visit 1. 4. Use of drugs with potential effect on NASH such as ursodeoxycholic acid, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e), betaine, pentoxifylline, obeticholic acid or milk thistle in the 3 months prior to Visit 1. 5. Changing doses of statins (simvastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, rosuvastatin) or fibrates (clofibrate, fenofibrate) in the 3 months preceding Visit 1. 6. Use of thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone, rosiglitazone). 7. Use of drugs that are known Cytochrome P4502C8 (CYP2C8) inhibitors/substrate 8. History of bowel surgery (gastrointestinal (bariatric) surgery or undergoing evaluation for bariatric surgery for obesity, extensive small-bowel resection or orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) or listed for OLT. 9. History of other chronic liver disease (chronic hepatitis C, (HCV) infection, irrespective of their mRNA HCV assay status or active hepatitis B infection, (i.e., serum positive for hepatitis B surface antigen) or autoimmune hepatitis, cholestatic and metabolic liver diseases) or hemochromatosis 10. Patient has known cirrhosis, either based on clinical criteria or liver histology. 11. Patient with Internation Normalised Ratio (INR) \>1.3. 12. Type 1 diabetes mellitus. 13. Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus, i.e., glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \> 9%. 14. Unstable cardiovascular disease, including: 1. unstable angina, (i.e., new or worsening symptoms of coronary heart disease within the 3 months preceding Visit 1), acute coronary syndrome within the 6 months preceding Visit 1, acute myocardial infarction within the 3 months preceding Visit 1 or heart failure of New York Heart Association class (III - IV) or worsening congestive heart failure, or coronary artery intervention, within the 6 months preceding Visit 1 2. history of (within 3 months preceding Visit 1) or current unstable cardiac dysrhythmias 3. uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \[BP\] \> 160 mmHg and/or diastolic BP \> 100 mmHg) 4. stroke or transient ischemic attack within the 6 months preceding Visit 1. 15. History of myopathies or evidence of active muscle disease. 16. History of malignancy in the 5 years preceding Visit 1 and/or active neoplasm with the exception of resolved superficial nonmelanoma skin cancer. 17. Any of the following laboratory values: 1. Hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL 2. White blood cell count \< 2.5 × 103/μL 3. Neutrophil count \< 1.5 × 103/μL 4. Platelets \< 100 × 103/μL 5. Total Serum bilirubin \> 1.5 mg/dL (except in patient with known Gilbert bilirubin where Total Bilirubin up to 2.5 mg/dL is allowed), if it is \<1.5 mg/dL at screening and \>30% variance in the levels at Visit 1 and Visit 2 6. Albumin \< 3.2 g/dL 7. Serum creatinine \>1.5 mg/dL 8. Serum ALT or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 250 IU/L at Visit 1 or Visit 2 . 18. Contraindications to Saroglitazar Magnesium or has any conditions affecting the ability to evaluate the effects of Saroglitazar Magnesium. 19. Known allergy, sensitivity or intolerance to the study drug, placebo or formulation ingredients. 20. Participation in any other therapeutic clinical study within the 3 months preceding Visit 1, including participation in any other NAFLD/NASH clinical trials. 21. History of bladder disease and/or hematuria or has current hematuria except due to a urinary tract infection. 22. Illicit substance abuse within the 12 months preceding Visit 1. 23. Pregnancy-related exclusions, including: 1. Pregnant/lactating female (including a positive serum pregnancy test at Visit 1) 2. A male patient has to use a condom with spermicide, and the female partner of the male patient has to use an intrauterine device OR a diaphragm with spermicide OR oral contraceptive pills. 3. If a male patient has undergone a vasectomy, the female partner does not have to use any contraception. 4. A female patient has to use either an intrauterine device OR a diaphragm with spermicide OR oral contraceptive pills. The male partner of the female patient has to use a condom with spermicide. 5. If the female patient is surgically sterilized for at least the 6 months preceding Visit 1 or postmenopausal, defined as at least 12 months with no menses and without an alternative cause, the male partner of the female patient does not have to use any contraception. 24. History or other evidence of severe illness or any other conditions that would make the patient, in the opinion of the investigator, unsuitable for the study (such as poorly controlled psychiatric disease, HIV, coronary artery disease or active gastrointestinal conditions that might interfere with drug absorption).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Week 16Baseline and Week 16Percentage change from baseline in serum ALT levels at Week 16 in the Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients With Sustain Decrease in Serum ALT LevelsWeek 16Proportion of patients with sustain decrease in serum ALT levels in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group
Changes in Cytokeratin-18baseline and Week 16Changes in cytokeratin-18 in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group
Changes in Enhanced Liver Fibrosisbaseline and Week 16Changes in enhanced liver fibrosis in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group The ELF Score is a liver fibrosis score that is calculated by use of an algorithm: ELF score score = -7.412 + (ln(HA)\*0.681) + (ln(P3NP)\*0.775) + (ln(TIMP1)\*0.494). HA=hyaluronic acid concentration P3NP=procollagen 3 amino terminal peptide concentration TIMP1=tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase 1 concentration. All are measured in serum. The ELF score has been reported to show good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease, with higher ELF scores associated with higher fibrosis stages. The ELF score is hence used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score \< 9.8 : Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \< 11.3 : Moderate risk of progression and ELF score \> = 11.3 : High risk of progression
Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-platelet Ratio IndexBaseline and Week 16Change in aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group APRI was calculated as (\[AST level/AST upper limit of normal\]/ \[Platelet count 1\^09/L\]) ×100, where AST is aspartate aminotransferase. The aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI) is used to assess the risk of liver fibrosis. Higher APRI score represents a higher risk of liver fibrosis
Pharmacokinetics of Saroglitazar Magnesium: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of Saroglitazar
Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of saroglitazar
Terminal Half-life (t1/2)PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of saroglitazar
Change in Liver Fat Content as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density-fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)Baseline and Week 16Change in liver fat content as measured by magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group
Area Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Infinity (AUC 0-inf)PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 3 (Week 0)Area under the curve from the time of dosing to the infinity (AUC 0-inf) for Saroglitazar
Elimination Rate Constant (λz)PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)Elimination rate constant (λz) for saroglitazar
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)Apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) for Saroglitazar
Apparent Clearance (CL/F)PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)Apparent clearance (CL/F) for Saroglitazar
Change in Quality of Life Assessed by the Short-Form 36 Health Surveybaseline and 16 WeekQuality of life will be assessed by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores (domains) as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36 taps 8 health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, emotional well-being, social functioning, vitality, and general health perceptions. The 8 scales are further summarized to 2 distinct higher-ordered clusters: the PCS and mental composite t-score (MCS). The range for all 8 domains as well as for the composite t-scores is from 0 to 100 with 100 as best possible health status and 0 as worst health status.
Safety and Tolerability of Saroglitazar MagnesiumBaseline to Week 17Number of participants with adverse events
Area Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 3 (Week 0)Area under the curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration for saroglitazar

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mg
Saroglitazar magnesium 1 mg tablet orally once daily in the morning before breakfast for 16 weeks. Saroglitazar magnesium 1 mg: Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar magnesium 1 mg tablet orally once daily for 16 weeks.
26
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg
Saroglitazar magnesium 2 mg tablet orally once daily in the morning before breakfast for 16 weeks. Saroglitazar magnesium 2 mg: Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar magnesium 2 mg tablet orally once daily for 16 weeks.
25
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mg
Saroglitazar magnesium 4 mg tablet orally once daily in the morning before breakfast for 16 weeks. Saroglitazar magnesium 4 mg: Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar magnesium 4 mg tablet orally once daily for 16 weeks.
27
Placebos
Placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning before breakfast for 16 weeks. Placebos: Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive placebo tablet orally once daily for 16 weeks.
28
Total106

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSaroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgSaroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgSaroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgPlacebosTotal
Age, Continuous51.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.89
47.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44
49 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97
48.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.46
49.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.13
Body Mass Index33.630 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2451
35.702 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5653
32.489 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1611
33.809 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4599
33.875 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8374
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants8 Participants12 Participants13 Participants43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants17 Participants15 Participants15 Participants63 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants21 Participants24 Participants24 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants12 Participants12 Participants13 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants13 Participants15 Participants15 Participants56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 250 / 270 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 266 / 253 / 275 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 260 / 251 / 270 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Week 16

Percentage change from baseline in serum ALT levels at Week 16 in the Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Week 16-26.2 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 33.36
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Week 16-27.0 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 26.52
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Week 16-44.9 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 26.26
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Week 162.6 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 32.06
p-value: 0.0002ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Apparent Clearance (CL/F)

Apparent clearance (CL/F) for Saroglitazar

Time frame: PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)

Population: PK population For Saroglitazar 4 mg, one subject was not considered for calculation of CL/F as adjusted R square was observed \<0.8000 and AUC\_%Extrap\_obs\>20%. Hence, N=07 instead of 08 for CL/F.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgApparent Clearance (CL/F)5969.472 mL/hourStandard Deviation 2502.313
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgApparent Clearance (CL/F)8030.060 mL/hourStandard Deviation 2356.62
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgApparent Clearance (CL/F)6972.059 mL/hourStandard Deviation 1890.09
Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)

Apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) for Saroglitazar

Time frame: PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)

Population: PK population For Saroglitazar 4 mg, one subject was not considered for calculation of Vd/F as adjusted R square was observed \<0.8000 and AUC\_%Extrap\_obs\>20%. Hence, N=07 instead of 08 for Vd/F

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)49788.200 mLStandard Deviation 18040.188
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)81341.167 mLStandard Deviation 72030.406
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)53772.143 mLStandard Deviation 17575.77
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Infinity (AUC 0-inf)

Area under the curve from the time of dosing to the infinity (AUC 0-inf) for Saroglitazar

Time frame: PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 3 (Week 0)

Population: PK population For Saroglitazar 4 mg, one subject was not considered for calculation of AUC 0-inf as adjusted R square was observed \<0.8000 and AUC\_%Extrap\_obs\>20%. Hence, N=07 instead of 08 for AUC 0-inf

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgArea Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Infinity (AUC 0-inf)167.735 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 45.322
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgArea Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Infinity (AUC 0-inf)305.532 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 203.074
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgArea Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Infinity (AUC 0-inf)652.497 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 169.565
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)

Area under the curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration for saroglitazar

Time frame: PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 3 (Week 0)

Population: PK population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgArea Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)171.064 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 45.818
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgArea Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)301.227 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 202.061
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgArea Under the Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)667.646 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 175.024
Secondary

Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-platelet Ratio Index

Change in aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group APRI was calculated as (\[AST level/AST upper limit of normal\]/ \[Platelet count 1\^09/L\]) ×100, where AST is aspartate aminotransferase. The aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI) is used to assess the risk of liver fibrosis. Higher APRI score represents a higher risk of liver fibrosis

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: Full Analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgChange in Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-platelet Ratio Index-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChange in Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-platelet Ratio Index-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChange in Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-platelet Ratio Index-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
PlaceboChange in Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-platelet Ratio Index0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
p-value: 0.0045ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0026ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0004ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Liver Fat Content as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density-fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)

Change in liver fat content as measured by magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgChange in Liver Fat Content as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density-fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)0.53 percentage of Liver fatStandard Deviation 5.228
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChange in Liver Fat Content as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density-fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)-0.36 percentage of Liver fatStandard Deviation 4.297
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChange in Liver Fat Content as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density-fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)-4.21 percentage of Liver fatStandard Deviation 6.231
PlaceboChange in Liver Fat Content as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density-fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)-0.28 percentage of Liver fatStandard Deviation 5.409
p-value: 0.5681ANCOVA
p-value: 0.4487ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0021ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life Assessed by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey

Quality of life will be assessed by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores (domains) as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures. The SF-36 taps 8 health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, emotional well-being, social functioning, vitality, and general health perceptions. The 8 scales are further summarized to 2 distinct higher-ordered clusters: the PCS and mental composite t-score (MCS). The range for all 8 domains as well as for the composite t-scores is from 0 to 100 with 100 as best possible health status and 0 as worst health status.

Time frame: baseline and 16 Week

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgChange in Quality of Life Assessed by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.24
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChange in Quality of Life Assessed by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.57
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChange in Quality of Life Assessed by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.77
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life Assessed by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.16
p-value: 0.2387ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1496ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0445ANCOVA
Secondary

Changes in Cytokeratin-18

Changes in cytokeratin-18 in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group

Time frame: baseline and Week 16

Population: full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgChanges in Cytokeratin-18-3.0 U/LStandard Deviation 693.75
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in Cytokeratin-18-330.3 U/LStandard Deviation 590.37
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in Cytokeratin-18-64.1 U/LStandard Deviation 303.59
PlaceboChanges in Cytokeratin-1897.4 U/LStandard Deviation 437.1
p-value: 0.2241ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0304ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0595ANCOVA
Secondary

Changes in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis

Changes in enhanced liver fibrosis in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group The ELF Score is a liver fibrosis score that is calculated by use of an algorithm: ELF score score = -7.412 + (ln(HA)\*0.681) + (ln(P3NP)\*0.775) + (ln(TIMP1)\*0.494). HA=hyaluronic acid concentration P3NP=procollagen 3 amino terminal peptide concentration TIMP1=tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase 1 concentration. All are measured in serum. The ELF score has been reported to show good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease, with higher ELF scores associated with higher fibrosis stages. The ELF score is hence used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score \< 9.8 : Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \< 11.3 : Moderate risk of progression and ELF score \> = 11.3 : High risk of progression

Time frame: baseline and Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgChanges in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
PlaceboChanges in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
p-value: 0.0449ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0053ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0036ANCOVA
Secondary

Elimination Rate Constant (λz)

Elimination rate constant (λz) for saroglitazar

Time frame: PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)

Population: PK population For Saroglitazar 4 mg, one subject was not considered for calculation of Kel as adjusted R square was observed \<0.8000 and AUC\_%Extrap\_obs\>20%. Hence, N=07 instead of 08 for Kel

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgElimination Rate Constant (λz)0.119 per hourStandard Deviation 0.027
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgElimination Rate Constant (λz)0.129 per hourStandard Deviation 0.047
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgElimination Rate Constant (λz)0.136 per hourStandard Deviation 0.035
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Saroglitazar Magnesium: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of Saroglitazar

Time frame: PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)

Population: PK population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgPharmacokinetics of Saroglitazar Magnesium: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)65.034 ng/mLStandard Deviation 17.579
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgPharmacokinetics of Saroglitazar Magnesium: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)98.995 ng/mLStandard Deviation 77.189
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgPharmacokinetics of Saroglitazar Magnesium: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)219.475 ng/mLStandard Deviation 111.521
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Sustain Decrease in Serum ALT Levels

Proportion of patients with sustain decrease in serum ALT levels in Saroglitazar Magnesium groups as compared to the placebo group

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Full Analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgProportion of Patients With Sustain Decrease in Serum ALT Levels22 Participants
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgProportion of Patients With Sustain Decrease in Serum ALT Levels22 Participants
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgProportion of Patients With Sustain Decrease in Serum ALT Levels26 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients With Sustain Decrease in Serum ALT Levels14 Participants
p-value: 0.007Chi-squared
p-value: 0.0031Chi-squared
p-value: 0.0001Chi-squared
Secondary

Safety and Tolerability of Saroglitazar Magnesium

Number of participants with adverse events

Time frame: Baseline to Week 17

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgSafety and Tolerability of Saroglitazar Magnesium13 participants
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgSafety and Tolerability of Saroglitazar Magnesium13 participants
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgSafety and Tolerability of Saroglitazar Magnesium14 participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of Saroglitazar Magnesium19 participants
Secondary

Terminal Half-life (t1/2)

Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of saroglitazar

Time frame: PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)

Population: PK population For Saroglitazar 4 mg, one subject was not considered for calculation of Half-life as adjusted R square was observed \<0.8000 and AUC\_%Extrap\_obs\>20%. Hence, N=07 instead of 08 for Half-life

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgTerminal Half-life (t1/2)6.040 hourStandard Deviation 1.314
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgTerminal Half-life (t1/2)6.597 hourStandard Deviation 4.217
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgTerminal Half-life (t1/2)5.429 hourStandard Deviation 1.509
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of saroglitazar

Time frame: PK sampling timepoints: Pre-dose (0.0), 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 24 hours post-dose of Visit 7 (Week 16)

Population: PK population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Saroglitazar Magnesium 1 mgTime to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)0.920 hours
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgTime to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)1.500 hours
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgTime to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)0.990 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026