Skip to content

Clinical Trial Evaluating Acutrak Headless Compression Screw Fixation of Medial Malleolus Fractures

Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Acutrak Headless Compression Screw Fixation of Medial Malleolus Fractures

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03061279
Enrollment
1
Registered
2017-02-23
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2017-10-26
Last updated
2020-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medial Malleolus Fractures

Keywords

Medial Malleolus fractures, headless screws, headed screws

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is assess the safety and efficacy of Acutrak headless screws in comparison to other fixation methods (traditional headed screws, plates, and wires) used in the treatment of medial malleolus fracture of the ankle joint. The investigators hope to learn the following objectives from this study 1. Prospectively establish equivalence with respect to fracture union rate after Acutrak headless compression screw fixation when compared to other fixation methods for medial malleolus fractures. 2. Prospectively establish equivalence with respect Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores after Acutrak headless compression screw fixation when compared to other fixation methods for medial malleolus fractures. 3. Prospectively establish superiority with respect to hardware related pain after Acutrak headless compression screw fixation when compared to other fixation methods for medial malleolus fractures. 4. Prospectively establish superiority with respect to the hardware removal rate after Acutrak headless compression screw fixation when compared to other fixation methods for medial malleolus fractures. Patients scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation for medial malleolus fracture by using Acutrak headless screw or any other method will be asked to enroll by the attending physician, and those patients will be asked to consent to the study. Patients will be randomized by sealed envelope to surgical fixation with traditional headed screws, plates, and wires or Acutrak headless compression screws. At the time of randomization, the fracture pattern and severity, past medical history and medications, and demographic data will be documented. After operative fixation, patients will receive routine fracture follow-up with a clinical evaluation for tenderness, radiographs to evaluate stability and union, and complete the PROMIS and Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) scores to 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgical fixation

Interventions

DEVICEFixation by Acutrak headless screw

The fixation provided by the Acutrak headless compression screws provide sufficient fixation to achieve union and a favorable clinical outcome in both horizontal and vertical medial malleolus fractures when compared to bicortical and unicortical screw fixation, tension band wiring, and mini-fragment or buttress plating

DEVICEFixation by headed screws, plates, and or wires

DePuy-Synthes Cannulated Cancellous Screws, DePuy-Synthes Cancellous Screws, DePuy-Synthes Cortical Screws, DePuy-Synthes 1/3 Tubular Plate, DePuy-Synthes Locking contrast dynamic compression (LC-DCP) Plate, DePuy-Synthes Pre-contoured Plate, and/or 18g Wire are the alternative methods of treatment of medial malleolus fracture.

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ankle fractures that undergo open reduction internal fixation of the medial malleolus

Exclusion criteria

* Tibial plafond (pilon) fractures * Medial malleolar osteotomies to access the talus, perform an ankle fusion, or deal with a pathologic lesion, osteonecrosis, or infection due to their diversity in diagnosis, management, and weight bearing status * Patients with prior surgical treatment of the ankle for fracture, deformity, infection, neoplasia, or other pathologic process on the ipsilateral extremity * Patients that are non-weight bearing on one or both lower extremities prior to sustaining their ankle injury

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Severity of Hardware Related Pain Localized to the Medial Malleolus at One Year After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture.Baseline, year 1Pain on a visual analogue scale (range: 0 to 1; 0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores at Two Years After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture - Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS)Baseline, year 2The PROMIS LEFS scale consists of 20 questions, each on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = extreme difficulty, 4 = no difficulty). Questions are summed for a total score.
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores at Two Years After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture - DepressionBaseline, year 2The PROMIS depression score is based on an adaptive test, and reported as a cumulative T-score with standard error.
Fracture Union Rate at One Year After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture.Month 3Fracture union rate assessed by radiographic imaging.
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores at Two Years After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture - Physical FunctionBaseline, year 2The PROMIS physical function score is based on an adaptive test, and reported as a cumulative T-score with standard error.
Amount Pain Medication Required During Recovery PeriodUp to 2 yearsPain medication measured in morphine equivalents.
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores at Two Years After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture - Pain InterferenceBaseline, year 2The PROMIS pain interference score is based on an adaptive test, and reported as a cumulative T-score with standard error.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Acutrak Fixation
Fixation by Acutrak headless screw: The fixation provided by the Acutrak headless compression screws provide sufficient fixation to achieve union and a favorable clinical outcome in both horizontal and vertical medial malleolus fractures when compared to bicortical and unicortical screw fixation, tension band wiring, and mini-fragment or buttress plating
0
Standard of Care Fixation
Fixation by headed screws, plates, and or wires: DePuy-Synthes Cannulated Cancellous Screws, DePuy-Synthes Cancellous Screws, DePuy-Synthes Cortical Screws, DePuy-Synthes 1/3 Tubular Plate, DePuy-Synthes Locking contrast dynamic compression (LC-DCP) Plate, DePuy-Synthes Pre-contoured Plate, and/or 18g Wire are the alternative methods of treatment of medial malleolus fracture.
1
Total1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard of Care FixationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Severity of Hardware Related Pain Localized to the Medial Malleolus at One Year After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture.

Pain on a visual analogue scale (range: 0 to 1; 0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable).

Time frame: Baseline, year 1

Population: No analysis was conducted due to small sample size and confidentiality concerns.

Secondary

Amount Pain Medication Required During Recovery Period

Pain medication measured in morphine equivalents.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: No analysis was conducted due to small sample size and confidentiality concerns.

Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores at Two Years After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture - Depression

The PROMIS depression score is based on an adaptive test, and reported as a cumulative T-score with standard error.

Time frame: Baseline, year 2

Population: No analysis was conducted due to small sample size and confidentiality concerns.

Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores at Two Years After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture - Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS)

The PROMIS LEFS scale consists of 20 questions, each on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = extreme difficulty, 4 = no difficulty). Questions are summed for a total score.

Time frame: Baseline, year 2

Population: No analysis was conducted due to small sample size and confidentiality concerns.

Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores at Two Years After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture - Pain Interference

The PROMIS pain interference score is based on an adaptive test, and reported as a cumulative T-score with standard error.

Time frame: Baseline, year 2

Population: No analysis was conducted due to small sample size and confidentiality concerns.

Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores at Two Years After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture - Physical Function

The PROMIS physical function score is based on an adaptive test, and reported as a cumulative T-score with standard error.

Time frame: Baseline, year 2

Population: No analysis was conducted due to small sample size and confidentiality concerns.

Secondary

Fracture Union Rate at One Year After Sustaining an Ankle Fracture.

Fracture union rate assessed by radiographic imaging.

Time frame: Month 3

Population: No analysis was conducted due to small sample size and confidentiality concerns.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026