Skip to content

Light Therapy as Treatment for Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis

Light Therapy as Treatment for Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03060759
Enrollment
35
Registered
2017-02-23
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2019-11-04
Last updated
2020-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Keywords

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Fatigue, Light Therapy

Brief summary

This prospective study will randomize 1:1 people living with multiple sclerosis-associated fatigue to one of two spectra of light therapy. Each participant will be asked to use the light box twice daily at home or at the workplace at preset hours during the day for a total of four weeks. Participants will be asked to record their fatigue on standard measurement scales before, during, and after the use of the light therapy box. The investigators anticipate a reduction in self-reported fatigue following the use of the light box therapy of a particular spectrum of light among people living with multiple sclerosis.

Detailed description

Study Protocol: Eligible participants will be consented and randomized 1:1 to (a) white LT (10,000 lux), or (b) dim red LT (\<300 lux). Participants will be informed that this study will examine the effect of two different light spectra on fatigue. The following assessments will be administered by the study principal investigator at the baseline visit: (1) the Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS), (2) FSS, (3) Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI), (4) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), (5) Berlin questionnaire for obstructive sleep apnea, (6) Epworth Sleepiness Scale. A two-week sleep diary will be collected before enrollment in order to screen for significant behavioral insufficient sleep or circadian rhythm disorders. The light box used for LT is designed to stand on a desk or tabletop. It can be used in the home or office. The light is delivered at a downward angle to maximize the effectiveness. The box runs on 124 watts and contains full spectrum 5000k 10,000 lux bulbs. Bright light treatment requires at least 2,500 lux to be effective. Data Collection: The study period will include a two-week baseline period, a four-week treatment period, and a four-week follow up period. Throughout the study period, participants will record their fatigue using the Visual Analogue Fatigue Scale (VAFS) four times daily, starting after waking up, and every four hours thereafter. The VAFS is a simple, validated 10-point scale ranging from 1 to 10 in which participants can report their fatigue as a snapshot at that particular moment. Data collection will occur by participants in self-report fashion. A FSS score will be collected at enrollment as well as at the end of the four week treatment period and the end of the four week follow-up period. There will be three visits with a principal investigators (PI), including the baseline visit described above, a visit with the PI at the end of the treatment period in which participants will report a FSS and discuss their experiences with LT, and a third follow-up visit at the end of the four-week follow up period for a final FSS. At this last visit they will be queried on whether they believe the intervention had any effect on their fatigue and whether they believe the alternative therapy (white light or dim red light) would have been more or less beneficial. Additionally participants will be asked to keep a LT log in which they will record daily LT exposure and associated side effects. Statistical Analysis: The primary outcome measure is the change in the average FSS after the four-week study period in the bright light active vs. dim light control groups. There are no reports on FSS in response to bright LT in pMS. Using the conventional values of α=0.05 and β=0.80 for 2-tailed tests of probability with equally sized groups: a difference in 10 points on FSS between groups requires 18 people per study arm; a difference in 8 points requires 28 people per group. If power is reduced to 70%, the sample sizes are 22 and 14 for 8-point and 10-point differences. First, the investigators will compare the mean change in FSS scores, from baseline to after completion of LT, in an intention to treat analysis. The secondary outcome measure will be a change in the global VAFS scores after light therapy in both groups. Frequencies will be used to describe baseline characteristics across treatment arms. X2 statistics or Fisher's exact test will be used to compare the differences between groups. VAFS will be evaluated using a mixed-effects model which accounts for correlation between repeated measurements. Participant logbooks will be used to generate summary statistics and graphically display fatigue patterns throughout the day. Logbooks will also qualitatively assess the safety and tolerability of LT.

Interventions

DEVICELight Therapy box

The light box used for LT (SunRay by The Sunbox Company, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA) is approximately 15.5 tall x 23 wide x 3.25 deep and is designed to stand on a desk or tabletop. It can be used both in the home or office. The light is delivered at a downward angle to maximize the effectiveness. The box runs on 124 watts and contains full spectrum 5000k 10,000 lux bulbs.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Relapsing remitting Multiple Sclerosis based on the McDonald Criteria (2010) * Over 18 years old * Presence of fatigue defined as FSS over 36

Exclusion criteria

* A change in an anti-depressant up to 4 weeks prior to study screening * A change in fatigue medication regime or MS disease modifying therapy up to 4 weeks prior to study screening * Shift work * Use of photosensitizing medication * Presence of eye trauma or acute optic neuritis within the preceding 3 months * History of traumatic brain injury * Probable (untreated) sleep apnea based on Berlin questionnaire * Significant anemia * History of mania * MS relapse in the preceding four weeks * Current pregnancy * Known light sensitivity * Other complicating illness preventing study completion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Average Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score4 weeksMeasure of general level of fatigue. Range: 9 to 63. Lower scores indicate less reported fatigue.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Light Therapy-Spectrum 1
Light from 'active' spectrum Light Therapy box: The light box used for LT (SunRay by The Sunbox Company, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA) is approximately 15.5 tall x 23 wide x 3.25 deep and is designed to stand on a desk or tabletop. It can be used both in the home or office. The light is delivered at a downward angle to maximize the effectiveness. The box runs on 124 watts and contains full spectrum 5000k 10,000 lux bulbs.
20
Light Therapy-Spectrum 2
Light from 'placebo' spectrum Light Therapy box: The light box used for LT (SunRay by The Sunbox Company, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA) is approximately 15.5 tall x 23 wide x 3.25 deep and is designed to stand on a desk or tabletop. It can be used both in the home or office. The light is delivered at a downward angle to maximize the effectiveness. The box runs on 124 watts and contains full spectrum 5000k 10,000 lux bulbs.
15
Total35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLight Therapy-Spectrum 1Light Therapy-Spectrum 2Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants15 Participants35 Participants
Age, Continuous47.2 years41.9 years44.9 years
Expanded Disability Status Scale Score3.1 units on a scale3.1 units on a scale3.1 units on a scale
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants10 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants15 participants35 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants12 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Type of Multiple Sclerosis
Primary Progressive MS
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Type of Multiple Sclerosis
Relapsing-remitting MS
20 Participants15 Participants35 Participants
Years since first diagnosis12.39 years8.93 years10.9 years

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 173 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Average Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score

Measure of general level of fatigue. Range: 9 to 63. Lower scores indicate less reported fatigue.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 4 participants were withdrawn from the study before providing outcome data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Light Therapy-Spectrum 1Change in Average Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score45.824 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Light Therapy-Spectrum 2Change in Average Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score46.714 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026