Skip to content

Deaf Weight Wise 2.0: A Healthy Lifestyle Intervention With Deaf Adults Who Are Overweight or Obese

Deaf Weight Wise 2.0: Clinical Trial of a Healthy Lifestyle Intervention With Deaf Adults Ages 21 to 70

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03060525
Acronym
DWW2
Enrollment
76
Registered
2017-02-23
Start date
2017-01-25
Completion date
2019-08-29
Last updated
2024-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Overweight

Keywords

Deaf, American Sign Language, Overweight, Obese

Brief summary

The purpose of the Deaf Weight Wise 2.0 (DWW 2.0) study is to test an evidence-based, comprehensive program to modify obesity-related health behaviors with Deaf people ages 21 to 70 who use American Sign Language (ASL) as their primary language. Participants will be randomized to one of four arms: immediate intervention vs. intervention delayed one year, and in-person group intervention vs. individual intervention delivered via videophone. The investigators' primary hypothesis is that participants in the immediate DWW 2.0 intervention will increase their physical activity and reduce their caloric intake and body weight compared with those in the delayed intervention group (no intervention yet).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDeaf Weight Wise 2.0

Deaf Weight Wise 2.0 is a group or individual intervention lead by trained, American Sign Language fluent Deaf counselors, who utilize an existing evidence-based curriculum that emphasizes healthy eating, exercise, and lifestyle components. It is a behavior change intervention that uses motivational interviewing techniques to help participants identify/recognize their own unhealthy behaviors, help individuals build skills that will promote behavior change, and help group members to support each other to make behavior changes. The Curriculum includes group exercise activities (Do It!), experiential learning activities (Try It! such as learning how to read a nutrition label or modify a recipe to make it healthier), and group activities related to food preparation or sampling healthy foods (Taste It!). Self-monitoring using daily food diaries and weekly weigh-ins is also a key component. The intervention also includes a 6-month follow up and maintenance phase.

Sponsors

University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Deaf men and women ages 21-70 years who use sign language and live in the Rochester Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), * have a body mass index (BMI) of 25-45. * Eligible subjects must also have permission to participate from a primary healthcare provider if: 1) self-reported diagnosis of a recent cardiovascular disease event (heart attack or stroke in past 6 months), 2) self-reported heart condition, chest pain, dizziness, or other reason not to participate in physical activity, 3) had weight loss surgery in the previous 2 years (self-reported), and 4) are pregnant (self-reported). * Subjects must also be willing to follow a healthy dietary pattern and to abstain from using weight loss medications during the study, and be willing and able to attend either group or videophone sessions, and to participate in data collection requirements.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body Weight (kg)6 month weight (kg) - baseline weight (kg)measure mean change = 6-month weight - baseline weight, for the immediate and delayed intervention groups (change from pre to post intervention).
Change in BMI (Body Mass Index)6-month BMI - baseline BMImeasure mean change = 6-month BMI - baseline BMI, for the immediate and delayed intervention groups (change from pre to post intervention).
Change in Physical Activity6-month MET-min/wk - baseline MET-min/wkchange in amount of physical activity = 6-month MET-minutes/week - baseline MET-minutes/week (change from pre to post intervention), using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. IPAQ score is a continuous measure and reports median MET-minutes per week (a combination of walking met-minutes/week + moderate activity MET-minutes/week + vigorous activity MET-minutes/week).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study recruited participants using a variety of methods, and had a rolling enrollment (in 4 waves). The first participant was enrolled on Jan. 25, 2017 and the last participant was enrolled on Sept. 22, 2017.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Immediate Group Intervention
Participants received the DWW 2.0 Group intervention in Year 1 of the clinical trial. The group intervention consisted of groups of approximately 6-8 subjects who meet together for 16 weeks, for two hours each week. A trained, deaf, American Sign Language (ASL)-fluent DWW 2.0 counselor led the sessions. Subjects were asked to complete a daily food and physical activity diary during the course of the 16-week intervention. Each intervention session included a weigh-in, group sharing and problem solving, discussion of a weight management topic, and a discussion on goal setting and action planning for the next week. Deaf Weight Wise 2.0 is a group or individual intervention lead by trained, American Sign Language fluent Deaf counselors, who utilize an existing evidence-based curriculum that emphasizes healthy eating, exercise, and lifestyle components. It is a behavior change intervention that uses motivational interviewing techniques to help participants identify/recognize unhealthy behaviors, build skills that will promote behavior change, and help group members to support each other to make behavior changes. The Curriculum includes group exercise (Do It!), experiential learning (Try It! such as learning how to read a nutrition label), and group activities such as sampling healthy foods (Taste It!). Self-monitoring using daily food diaries and weekly weigh-ins are encouraged. The intervention also includes a 6-month follow up and maintenance phase.
16
Immediate Videophone Intervention
Participants received the DWW 2.0 Individual Videophone intervention in Year 1 of the clinical trial. The participant and their intervention counselor had one-on-one sessions via videophone, for one hour each week. Each session was led by a trained deaf, ASL-fluent DWW 2.0 counselor. Subjects were asked to complete a daily food and physical activity diary during the course of the 16-week intervention. Each intervention session included a weigh-in, personal sharing and problem solving, discussion of a weight management topic, and a discussion on goal setting and action planning for the next week. Deaf Weight Wise 2.0 is a group or individual intervention lead by trained, American Sign Language fluent Deaf counselors, who utilize an existing evidence-based curriculum that emphasizes healthy eating, exercise, and lifestyle components. It is a behavior change intervention that uses motivational interviewing techniques to help participants identify/recognize unhealthy behaviors, build skills that will promote behavior change, and help group members to support each other to make behavior changes. The Curriculum includes group exercise (Do It!), experiential learning (Try It! such as learning how to read a nutrition label), and group activities such as sampling healthy foods (Taste It!). Self-monitoring using daily food diaries and weekly weigh-ins are encouraged. The intervention also includes a 6-month follow up and maintenance phase.
18
Delayed Group Intervention
Participants received the DWW 2.0 Group intervention in Year 2 of the clinical trial. The group intervention consisted of groups of approximately 6-8 subjects who meet together for 16 weeks, for two hours each week. A trained, deaf, American Sign Language (ASL)-fluent DWW 2.0 counselor led the sessions. Subjects were asked to complete a daily food and physical activity diary during the course of the 16-week intervention. Each intervention session included a weigh-in, group sharing and problem solving, discussion of a weight management topic, and a discussion on goal setting and action planning for the next week. Deaf Weight Wise 2.0 is a group or individual intervention lead by trained, American Sign Language fluent Deaf counselors, who utilize an existing evidence-based curriculum that emphasizes healthy eating, exercise, and lifestyle components. It is a behavior change intervention that uses motivational interviewing techniques to help participants identify/recognize unhealthy behaviors, build skills that will promote behavior change, and help group members to support each other to make behavior changes. The Curriculum includes group exercise (Do It!), experiential learning (Try It! such as learning how to read a nutrition label), and group activities such as sampling healthy foods (Taste It!). Self-monitoring using daily food diaries and weekly weigh-ins are encouraged. The intervention also includes a 6-month follow up and maintenance phase.
21
Delayed Videophone Intervention
Participants received the DWW 2.0 Individual Videophone intervention in Year 2 of the clinical trial. The participant and their intervention counselor had one-on-one sessions via videophone, for one hour each week. Each session was led by a trained deaf, ASL-fluent DWW 2.0 counselor. Subjects were asked to complete a daily food and physical activity diary during the course of the 16-week intervention. Each intervention session included a weigh-in, personal sharing and problem solving, discussion of a weight management topic, and a discussion on goal setting and action planning for the next week. Deaf Weight Wise 2.0 is a group or individual intervention lead by trained, American Sign Language fluent Deaf counselors, who utilize an existing evidence-based curriculum that emphasizes healthy eating, exercise, and lifestyle components. It is a behavior change intervention that uses motivational interviewing techniques to help participants identify/recognize unhealthy behaviors, build skills that will promote behavior change, and help group members to support each other to make behavior changes. The Curriculum includes group exercise (Do It!), experiential learning (Try It! such as learning how to read a nutrition label), and group activities such as sampling healthy foods (Taste It!). Self-monitoring using daily food diaries and weekly weigh-ins are encouraged. The intervention also includes a 6-month follow up and maintenance phase.
21
Total76

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall Studymoved out of state1111
Overall Studyno longer interested in doing intervention0001
Overall Studyunable to meet time commitment required of study2331

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalDelayed Videophone InterventionDelayed Group InterventionImmediate Videophone InterventionImmediate Group Intervention
Age became deaf
Became deaf at age 3 or younger (including born deaf)
69 Participants20 Participants18 Participants17 Participants14 Participants
Age became deaf
Became deaf at age 4 or older
5 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age became deaf
Unknown
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Continuous42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8
43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
42.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
73 Participants21 Participants20 Participants16 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
60 Participants17 Participants17 Participants13 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants13 Participants18 Participants13 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants8 Participants3 Participants5 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 180 / 210 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 180 / 210 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 180 / 210 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Change in BMI (Body Mass Index)

measure mean change = 6-month BMI - baseline BMI, for the immediate and delayed intervention groups (change from pre to post intervention).

Time frame: 6-month BMI - baseline BMI

Population: 62 cases were included in analysis of primary outcomes (out of 76 enrolled). 14 cases were excluded from analysis because they had data for only one timepoint out of five timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Group InterventionChange in BMI (Body Mass Index)-0.91 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.61
Immediate Videophone InterventionChange in BMI (Body Mass Index)-1.05 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.6
Delayed Group InterventionChange in BMI (Body Mass Index)0.39 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.58
Delayed Videophone InterventionChange in BMI (Body Mass Index)0.20 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.53
Comparison: Difference in Body Mass Index (BMI) change from Baseline to 6months, between Immediate Intervention participants (group and videophone combined) vs. Delayed Intervention participants (group and videophone combined). \[analysis of 2 arms, immediate intervention vs. delayed intervention\]p-value: 0.0395% CI: [-2.42, -0.12]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Body Weight (kg)

measure mean change = 6-month weight - baseline weight, for the immediate and delayed intervention groups (change from pre to post intervention).

Time frame: 6 month weight (kg) - baseline weight (kg)

Population: 62 cases were included in analysis of primary outcomes (out of 76 enrolled). 14 cases were excluded from analysis because they had data for only one timepoint out of five timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Group InterventionChange in Body Weight (kg)-2.36 kgStandard Error 1.56
Immediate Videophone InterventionChange in Body Weight (kg)-3.09 kgStandard Error 1.54
Delayed Group InterventionChange in Body Weight (kg)1.02 kgStandard Error 1.49
Delayed Videophone InterventionChange in Body Weight (kg)0.26 kgStandard Error 1.37
Comparison: Difference in weight change from Baseline to 6months, between Immediate Intervention participants (group and videophone combined) vs. Delayed Intervention participants (group and videophone combined). \[analysis of 2 arms, immediate intervention vs. delayed intervention\]p-value: 0.02695% CI: [-6.32, -0.41]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Physical Activity

change in amount of physical activity = 6-month MET-minutes/week - baseline MET-minutes/week (change from pre to post intervention), using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. IPAQ score is a continuous measure and reports median MET-minutes per week (a combination of walking met-minutes/week + moderate activity MET-minutes/week + vigorous activity MET-minutes/week).

Time frame: 6-month MET-min/wk - baseline MET-min/wk

Population: 56 cases were included in analysis of this physical activity primary outcomes (out of 76 enrolled). 14 cases were excluded from analysis because they had data for only one timepoint out of five timepoints (76-14=62); an additional 6 cases were excluded from the physical activity analysis due to missing physical activity data at the 6-month time point (n=56 for analysis).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Immediate Group InterventionChange in Physical Activity2.75 MET-minutes/wk
Immediate Videophone InterventionChange in Physical Activity543.50 MET-minutes/wk
Delayed Group InterventionChange in Physical Activity-82.50 MET-minutes/wk
Delayed Videophone InterventionChange in Physical Activity66.00 MET-minutes/wk
Comparison: change in amount of physical activity = 6-month MET-minutes/week - baseline MET-minutes/week (change from pre to post intervention), using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. IPAQ score is a continuous measure and reports median MET-minutes per week (a combination of walking met-minutes/week + moderate activity MET-minutes/week + vigorous activity MET-minutes/week). \[analysis of 2 arms, immediate intervention vs. delayed intervention\]p-value: 0.63Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026