Skip to content

A New Approach for Controlling Hemostasis During Canal Treatment: a Pilot Study

A New Approach for Controlling Hemostasis During Canal Treatment: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03060486
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-02-23
Start date
2016-12-01
Completion date
2017-01-17
Last updated
2018-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Contamination of Root Canal During Endodontic Therapy

Brief summary

Blood contamination, such as apical microleakage, of root canal during preparation can be a major problem in endodontics. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the hemostatic properties of sulfonic/sulfuric acid solution used during root canal therapy in teeth with irreversible pulpitis.

Detailed description

A new device (HYBENX®) has been developed with the purpose of destroying dental biofilm. The material contains a concentrated aqueous mixture of hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid (37%) and hydroxymethoxybenzene acids (23%), sulfuric acid (28%), and water (12%). The investigators planned a clinical and microbiological study using the decontaminant device in order to destroy the dental biofilm of root canals in cases of irreversible pulpitis. The ability of the decontaminant device to immediately stop bleeding during canal instrumentation was found out accidentally during the procedures of this still unpublished trial. Due to this fact, the investigators were interested in evaluating the coagulation property of the material. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study is to describe a new approach to obtain hemostasis during root canal therapy using a sulfonic/sulfuric acid solution. A total of 15 teeth with irreversible and acute pulpitis were included in the study. After manual and mechanical instrumentation of the root canal, a sterile paper point was introduced in the canal, and a first score was given based on the blood quantity. The solution was used to irrigate the bleeding root canal; then a second sterile paper point was introduced, and the same score was assessed. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference in root canal bleeding before and after the use of the solution (⎧=0)

Interventions

DEVICEHYBENX®

The mixture was then introduced inside the root canal using the pre-dosed syringe for 20 seconds with a sterile paper point with and up and down movement. Finally, the canal was rinsed with sterile saline water using a syringe with a side-vented 30 G needle.

Sponsors

Dr Riccardo Pace
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* tooth affected by irreversible pulpitis, single-rooted teeth associated with healthy periodontium, physiologic sulcus depth (\<3 mm), and absence of bleeding on probing of the involved teeth.

Exclusion criteria

* patients with systemic diseases using anticoagulants, antibiotics, or anti-inflammatory therapies in the last 30 days, patients with allergy to sulfur in any form, and pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Root Canal Bleeding Score20 sec - before and after useAfter the root canal, shaping was performed, and a first sterile paper point was introduced in the root canal, up to the working length, to detect blood presence. The root canal bleeding score (RCBS) was given as follows: * 0: no blood detected * 1: blood detected in the apical third of the root canal * 2: blood detected both in the apical and the middle thirds of the root canal * 3: blood detected in the whole root canal. After the use of the material a second sterile paper point was introduced in the root canal, up to the working length, to detect the presence of blood and an RCBS was assessed according the previous criteria

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HYBENX®
1 cc of mixture of hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid (37%) and hydroxymethoxybenzene acids (23%), sulfuric acid (28%), and water (12%) for 20 sec HYBENX®: The mixture was then introduced inside the root canal using the pre-dosed syringe for 20 seconds with a sterile paper point with and up and down movement. Finally, the canal was rinsed with sterile saline water using a syringe with a side-vented 30 G needle.
15
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHYBENX®
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Root Canal Bleeding Score

After the root canal, shaping was performed, and a first sterile paper point was introduced in the root canal, up to the working length, to detect blood presence. The root canal bleeding score (RCBS) was given as follows: * 0: no blood detected * 1: blood detected in the apical third of the root canal * 2: blood detected both in the apical and the middle thirds of the root canal * 3: blood detected in the whole root canal. After the use of the material a second sterile paper point was introduced in the root canal, up to the working length, to detect the presence of blood and an RCBS was assessed according the previous criteria

Time frame: 20 sec - before and after use

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HYBENX®Change From Baseline in Root Canal Bleeding ScoreBefore use2.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.724
HYBENX®Change From Baseline in Root Canal Bleeding ScoreAfter use0.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.352
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon signed-rank test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026