Skip to content

A Histomorphometric Analysis Following Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Bone Graft Materials.

A Histomorphometric Analysis of New Bone Formation Following Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Bone Graft Materials. A Pilot Study in Humans.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03059914
Enrollment
9
Registered
2017-02-23
Start date
2017-08-10
Completion date
2020-06-26
Last updated
2024-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Missing Teeth

Brief summary

The purpose of this investigator-initiated study is to compare new bone formation through histomorphometric analysis following maxillary sinus augmentation using two different bone graft materials. A total of twenty, sinus augmentation via a lateral approach will be performed for subjects requiring sinus augmentation for implant placement and randomly divided into 2 groups. These subjects will receive one of two different bone graft materials: 1) Anorganic bovine bone matrix- InterOss (Group A), 2) Anorganic bovine bone matrix- Bio-oss (Group B). At the time of implant placement (eight months after the sinus augmentation procedure), two bone biopsies will be collected from augmented site for the histomorphometric analysis. The percentage of vital bone will be measured and analyzed statistically, also the following will be measured: percentage of non-vital bone, percentage of non-bone material , and the percentage of connective tissue.

Detailed description

Bovine xenograft has been established as a gold standard in maxillary sinus floor augmentation. This study was initiated to compare two different types of bovine xenografts following maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The comparison will performed using histomorphometric analysis of bone cores removed from the grafted sites. The patients that meet the guidelines for maxillary sinus floor augmentation via lateral window approach are randomly assigned into control and test groups. The surgery is performed by the same surgeon under the same protocols. The subjects in Group A - test group receive InterOss bone graft and subjects in Group B- Control Group receive BioOss bone graft. After eight months of healing at the sites, the patients are subjected to CBCT evaluation in preparation for implant placement. At the time of implant placement the two bone cores are collected from each grafted site using trephine burs. One bone core is collected from the crestal bone that will be site of implant placement and the second bone core is collected from the lateral window area not to interfere with the implant site. These bone cores are stored intact inside the trephine burs, fixed, stored and transported to the lab for histomorphometric analysis. The following parameters are measured and reported after the histomorphometric analysis. percentage of vital bone percentage of non-vital bone ( graft material) percentage of non-bone material percentage of connective tissue.

Interventions

DEVICEInterOss

Anorganic bovine bone mineral - Xenograft

DEVICEBio-oss

Anorganic bovine bone mineral ( Xenograft)

Sponsors

Loma Linda University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 103 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Over 18 years old who are able to read and sign an informed consent form. 2. Patient who has good oral hygiene (Full-mouth plaque score \<25%). 3. Subject would be available for study monitoring and follow-up visits. 4. Patients with missing teeth in the maxillary posterior region who will require sinus augmentation for implant placement. The patients may be partially or completely edentulous. 5. Patient is a candidate for delayed implant placement approximately 8 months following sinus grafting

Exclusion criteria

1. Alcohol, drug dependency. 2. Signs or symptoms of chronic maxillary sinus disease. 3. Current smoker. 4. History of head and neck radiation treatment. 5. Poor health, conditions like uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension or other uncontrolled systemic disease. 6. Physical or psychological reason that might affect the surgical procedure or the subsequent prosthodontic treatment and/or required follow-up examinations. 7. Also, subjects who are nursing or pregnant will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of New Vital Bone.8 months post operative after the initial sinus augmentation surgery.Vital bone as seen in histology from the collected bone cores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Percentage of Bone Marrow and Fibrous TissueEight months post-op sinus augmentationCumulative percentage of Bone marrow and fibrous tissue as seen in histology.
Space8 monthsSpace seen the histology specimen not filled with either bone or fibrous tissue in the bone core specimens.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The unit of enrollment here is one maxillary sinus that qualifies for grafting via lateral window approach. 9 patients were recruited who had 15 qualified maxillary sinus' in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
InterOss
Maxillary sinus augmentation using ABBM Inteross ( Xenograft) InterOss: Anorganic bovine bone mineral - Xenograft
4
InterOss
Maxillary sinus augmentation using ABBM Inteross ( Xenograft) InterOss: Anorganic bovine bone mineral - Xenograft
6
Bio-oss
Maxillary sinus augmentation using ABBM Bio-oss ( Xenograft) Bio-oss: Anorganic bovine bone mineral ( Xenograft)
5
Bio-oss
Maxillary sinus augmentation using ABBM Bio-oss ( Xenograft) Bio-oss: Anorganic bovine bone mineral ( Xenograft)
9
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBio-ossTotalInterOss
Age, Continuous54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Maxillary sinus5 Maxillary sinus3 Maxillary sinus
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Maxillary sinus10 Maxillary sinus3 Maxillary sinus

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of New Vital Bone.

Vital bone as seen in histology from the collected bone cores.

Time frame: 8 months post operative after the initial sinus augmentation surgery.

Population: Subjects requiring sinus augmentation for implant placement

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterOssPercentage of New Vital Bone.Lateral core16.33 percentage of new vital boneStandard Deviation 8.43
InterOssPercentage of New Vital Bone.Crestal core30.5 percentage of new vital boneStandard Deviation 5.86
Bio-ossPercentage of New Vital Bone.Lateral core26.11 percentage of new vital boneStandard Deviation 11.63
Bio-ossPercentage of New Vital Bone.Crestal core39.67 percentage of new vital boneStandard Deviation 3.52
Secondary

Cumulative Percentage of Bone Marrow and Fibrous Tissue

Cumulative percentage of Bone marrow and fibrous tissue as seen in histology.

Time frame: Eight months post-op sinus augmentation

Population: Subjects requiring sinus augmentation for implant placement

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterOssCumulative Percentage of Bone Marrow and Fibrous TissueLateral core56.33 Cumulative percentageStandard Deviation 5.57
InterOssCumulative Percentage of Bone Marrow and Fibrous TissueCrestal core50.17 Cumulative percentageStandard Deviation 5.53
Bio-ossCumulative Percentage of Bone Marrow and Fibrous TissueLateral core51.67 Cumulative percentageStandard Deviation 6.48
Bio-ossCumulative Percentage of Bone Marrow and Fibrous TissueCrestal core46.33 Cumulative percentageStandard Deviation 8.91
Secondary

Space

Space seen the histology specimen not filled with either bone or fibrous tissue in the bone core specimens.

Time frame: 8 months

Population: Subjects requiring sinus augmentation for implant placement

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterOssSpaceLateral core27.33 percentage of space not filled with boneStandard Deviation 13.54
InterOssSpaceCrestal core19.5 percentage of space not filled with boneStandard Deviation 4.59
Bio-ossSpaceLateral core22.11 percentage of space not filled with boneStandard Deviation 10.15
Bio-ossSpaceCrestal core14.00 percentage of space not filled with boneStandard Deviation 12.51

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026