Skip to content

Disease Perception and Recovery From Low Back Pain

A Prospective Cohort Study With 52 Weeks Follow-up Investigating the Influence of Disease Perception on Functional Outcome Among Patients Referred From General Practice to Secondary Care for Treatment of Low Back Pain.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03058315
Enrollment
828
Registered
2017-02-20
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2019-04-01
Last updated
2019-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Physical activity, Disease perception, Pain beliefs, Disability, Advice

Brief summary

The main purpose of the study is to investigate the importance of patients' beliefs regarding staying active despite low back pain, among patients referred from general practice to secondary care treatment in Denmark. It is hypothesised that patients believing that staying active will help them recover will have higher odds of a 30%-improvement in The Roland Morris Disability score after 52 weeks compared to patients disagreeing that staying active will lead to better recovery.

Detailed description

Background: According to international guidelines on low back pain (LBP), advice to stay active should be provided from healthcare professionals to all patients with LBP. However, provision of advice to stay active is reported to be diverse. Some primary care healthcare professionals believe that avoidance of activities and work will help the patient recover. Consequently some patients are not receiving optimal advice to stay active and may think that inactivity will help them and consequently achieve less favourable treatment outcomes. Thus, changing patients' beliefs are considered the key decisive factor to change actual behaviour, and by that improve the functional ability of the patients. This should reduce primary health care use and reduce referrals to the more expensive treatments in secondary care. The effect of patients' beliefs on their functional outcomes has to our knowledge never been studied in a population of patients with LBP being referred from primary care to secondary care treatment. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. Data is collected from a consecutive series of 800 adult patients (18+), with low back pain as the dominant musculoskeletal complaint, referred from general practices in Central Denmark Region to the Spine Centre at Silkeborg Regional Hospital. Patients will be excluded in case of spinal fractures or malignancy. All patients seen at the Spine Centre receive a digital letter with a link to an online questionnaire to be completed approximately one week before their appointment at the Spine Centre. The questionnaire contains questions about their back pain history, present pain (Low Back Pain Rating Scale), disability (Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire), quality of life (EQ-5D), fear-avoidance questions (Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire), STarT Back Screening tool, questions on average level of physical activity, beliefs about physical activity in relation to back pain, advice received from health professionals about staying active, and questions about employment and housing situation. For those accepting participation the same questionnaire is forwarded by email 52 weeks after the initial visit at the Spine Center. Expected outcome and perspective: This study will bring knowledge about the associations between patient's disease perceptions and beliefs about staying active despite pain and their functional improvement. Furthermore, the study will clarify to what extent patients perceive to have been given advice to stay active by a primary care health professional. Although this study does not explain why some patients do not have guideline concordant beliefs, it will help inform health care professionals in primary care about the possible potential of an increased primary care attention towards the recommendation of staying active when patients have LBP.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Aalborg University
CollaboratorOTHER
Central Jutland Regional Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Low back pain (with or without sciatica) as the dominant musculoskeletal complaint * 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

* Spinal fractures * Malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Rolland Morris Disability QuestionnaireChange from baseline to 52 weeksValidated questionnaire containing 23 questions on self-reported disability due to low back pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Low Back Pain Rating ScaleChange from baseline to 52 weeksValidated questionnaire containing 6 questions on self-reported back and leg pain intensity
Change in EuroQol 5 Dimensions (quality of life)Change from baseline to 52 weeksValidated questionnaire containing 5 questions on self-reported generic quality of life
Change in proportion on sick leaveChange in proportion of patients on sick leave from baseline to 52 weeksSelf-reported average weekly sick leave during the past 4 weeks
Received consultations in primary sector after referral to secondary careMeasured at 52 week follow-upAny consultations with GP, physiotherapist or chiropractors in the year following referral to secondary care due to low back pain (YES/NO)
Change in Major Depression Inventory (depression)Change from baseline to 52 weeksValidated questionnaire containing 10 questions regarding symptoms of depression

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026