Lumbosacral Radicular Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
Caudal epidural injections have been commonly performed in patients with low back pain and radiculopathy. Conventional caudal epidural injections, which the needle is advanced into the sacral canal, present a potential risk of penetration of the epidural venous plexus or dura. The investigators hypothesized that a new caudal injection technique, which the needle only penetrates the sacrococcygeal ligament without being inserted into the sacral canal, might represent a safe alternative, with a lower incidence of intravascular injections and patient's discomfort during the procedure than the conventional technique. The study is designed to investigate the influence of the depth of the inserted needle on successful epidurogram and clinical outcome in caudal epidural injections under the ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
Interventions
new caudal injection technique is applied to the Group B, which is that the needle only penetrates the sacrococcygeal ligament without being inserted into the sacral canal
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients (20-80 years of age) who were scheduled to receive caudal epidural injection for lumbosacral radicular pain at our pain management clinic
Exclusion criteria
* pregnancy * coagulopathy * systemic infection * any active infection at the injection site * history of allergy to contrast media, local anesthetics, corticosteroid * patients unable to communicate or patients with cognitive dysfunction
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| the incidence of intravascular injection | 5 seconds after injection of contrast media via block needle. | the incidence of intravascular injection in the conventional method group and the new method group during the caudal epidural injections. |
Countries
South Korea