Skip to content

Inflammatory Local Response During OLV: Protective vs Conventional Ventilation Strategy

Does a Protective One Lung Ventilation Strategy Reduce the Inflammatory Cytokine Local Response After Pulmonary Resection?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03056885
Enrollment
28
Registered
2017-02-17
Start date
2015-11-02
Completion date
2016-01-15
Last updated
2017-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inflammatory Response, Respiratory Complication, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

Keywords

one-lung ventilation, broncho-alveolar lavage, protective ventilation, cytokines, thoracic surgery

Brief summary

This study evaluates the local cytokine inflammatory response during one lung ventilation in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy or wedge resection. We compare two different ventilation strategies: a conventional strategy with a protective strategy.

Detailed description

One-lung ventilation (OLV) is a ventilation procedure used for pulmonary resection often causing lung injury. International guidelines have recommended for years the use of conventional ventilation (CV) with high tidal volume (VT) (8-10 ml\\kg).A body of recent evidences have shown that conventional ventilation can reduce systemic oxygenation, increase inflammatory products and cause lung tissue damage. In this study we compare the conventional strategy , consisted of Vt 10 mL/kg, with the protective strategy, consisted of Vt 5 mL/kg. Both Vt were based on predicted body weight (PBW). Broncho-alveolar lavages (BAL) are selectively performed in the dependent (ventilated) lung before and at the end of the OLV. The levels of pro-inflammatory (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF) and anti-inflammatory (IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, INFγ) cytokines are evaluated. We also evaluate patients clinical outcomes in terms of incidence of postoperative respiratory complications and length of stay.

Interventions

OTHERConventional One-Lung Ventilation

Vt 10 ml/kg

OTHERProtective One-lung ventilation

Vt 5 ml/kg

Sponsors

University of Roma La Sapienza
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing elective lobectomy and wedge resection

Exclusion criteria

* emergency surgery, pregnancy, patient refusal, inability to give consent, age ≤ 18 years and ≥ ASA IV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
local cytokine inflammatory response in the two study groupsChange from Baseline cytokines level and the end of surgery (about 60 minutes)The levels of cytokines were evaluated in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of postoperative respiratory in the two study groupswithin 48 hours of the operationPaO2 /FIO 2 \<300 mm Hg and /or the presence of newly developed lung lesions (lung infi ltration and atelectasis)
lenght of stay in the two study groups1 monthlenght of hospital stay expressed in days

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026