Air Leak From Lung, Post Procedural Persistent Drain Fluid
Conditions
Keywords
thoracic surgery, silastic drains, conventional drains
Brief summary
In thoracic surgery, it is usual to place apical and basal drains for complete drainage of air and fluid out of the pleural cavity. The routinely used drains are mainly made of plastic. Recently silastic drains of smaller size are used without any complication. The investigators designed a prospective randomized trial to compare the draining properties of the two types of drains following various resections in thoracic surgery.
Detailed description
Following the Institutional Review Board permission (permission no: 2009/27) the investigators started to recruit patients for the study in June 2009. Pneumonectomy, decortication, and diaphragm plication patients were not included in this study. The patients were consecutively placed in one of the two groups. In Group I, an apical 28FR size CD, and a basal 19FR SD were placed following surgery. In Group II, the apical drain was 28FR, and the basal drain was 32FR CDs. Basal drains were removed out when daily serous fluid drainage became 200 ml or less, and the apical were removed 48-72 hours following the cessation of air leak. The patients were discharged on the day after drain removal. The data concerning gender, age, diagnosis, operation side, type of operation, amount of fluid drainage, duration of fluid and air drainage, length of hospital stay, and complications if any, were noted.
Interventions
PROCEDURESilastic vs conventional drain in thoracic surgery
Apical drains will be identical in size and material, and the basal drains will be different in groups. The patients will be followed for daily amounts of fluid drainage, duration of air leaks and fluid drainage, and duration of hospitalization, and the results will be compared statistically to asses any possible relationships with the outcome and the type of basal drain used.
Sponsors
Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital
T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Candidates of surgery willing to participate in the experimental arm of the study and signing the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
* Pneumonectomy, diaphragm plication, and decortication candidates
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of hospital stay | 3 years | Duration of hospital stay will be noted on the study datasheet and will be measured in days. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Daily amount of fluid drainage | 3 years | Daily amount of fluid drainage will be measured in mililiters during the daily rounds everyday, and will be noted on the datasheet. |
| Duration of fluid drainage | 3 years | Everyday the drains will be checked for fluid drainage and the day without any drainage will be noted on the datasheet. Duration of fluid drainage will be measured in days since the postoperative day 1. |
| Duration of air leak | 3 years | Everyday the drains will be checked for air leaks and the day without any air leak will be noted on the datasheet. Duration of air leak will be measured in days since the postoperative day 1. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed