Skip to content

CardioFocus vs. Contact Force Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

CardioFocus vs. Contact Force Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03056222
Acronym
CF²
Enrollment
360
Registered
2017-02-17
Start date
2017-04-10
Completion date
2021-11-15
Last updated
2021-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the acute procedure and safety outcomes as well as long term clinical outcomes of 2 groups of patients treated with the HeartLight® Endoscopically Guided Laser Ablation (EGLA) or a commercially available Contact Force Sensing Irrigated Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation Catheter plus, at the operator's discretion, 3D Electroanatomical Mapping (EAM) for the treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF).

Interventions

Ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Sponsors

I-Med-Pro GmbH
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient must not have undergone a previous ablation for the treatment of PAF * AF Type - Diagnosed with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) where PAF is defined as recurrent (two or more) episodes of AF that terminate spontaneously in less than seven days, usually less than 48 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Atrial fibrillation secondary to a reversible cause or of non-cardiac origin * Diagnosed with persistent atrial fibrillation defined as recurrent episodes lasting more than 7 and less than 365 days * More than 4 electrical cardioversions in the year prior to enrollment but not including cardioversions performed within 48 hours of arrhythmia onset * Documented left atrial thrombus on imaging * Cannot be removed from anti-arrhythmic drugs for other reasons than atrial fibrillation * New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional Class III or Class IV heart failure * Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30% * Left atrial size \> 55 mm as measured in the parasternal antero-posterior view * Myocardial infarction within 60 days prior to enrolment * Woman of childbearing potential who is pregnant, lactating or not using adequate birth control

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Freedom from symptomatic, recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) off of anti-arrhythmic drugs12 months post procedureRecurrent AF is defined as any documented episode of AF lasting more than 30 seconds after a blanking period of 90 days post procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute procedure success30 minutes post procedureConfirmation of electrical isolation with a circular mapping catheter
Procedure and fluoroscopy timeDuring procedureTime will be taken
Incidence of peri-procedural complicationsFrom procedure to 12 months post procedureE.g. major bleeding requiring intervention, phrenic nerve palsy, pericardial tamponade, thrombo-embolic events, pulmonary vein (PV) -stenosis, atrial-to-esophageal fistula, death
Freedom from symptomatic, recurrent Atrial Tachy Arrhythmia (ATA) off of anti-arrhythmic drugs12 months post procedureRecurrent ATA is defined as any documented episode of ATA lasting more than 30 seconds after a blanking period of 90 days post procedure

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, Germany, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026