Ischemic Heart Disease
Conditions
Keywords
OPTIMA-C
Brief summary
Investigators try to assess the safety of 6-months or 12-months maintenance of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin + clopidogrel) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using the Zotarolimus-eluting, Resolute Integrity™ stent (Medtronic Vascular Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) or the BioMatrix™ stent (Biosensors. Singapore).
Detailed description
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has proven the most effective treatment in reducing thrombotic complications after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation. Although the optimal duration of antiplatelet therapy is still under investigation, late stent thrombosis (ST) with DES has pushed the recommendation for duration of clopidogrel therapy for one year or more, in patients without risks for bleeding. However, recent controversies regarding the risk of stent thrombosis in patients receiving DES has brought up the issue of the appropriate duration of antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention, and a recent study reported that the use of extended DAPT for a period longer than 12 months in patients who had received DES was not significantly more effective than aspirin monotherapy in reducing the rate of myocardial infarction (MI) or death for cardiac causes. Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Resolute Integrity™) and biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer system (BioMatrix™) share several similarities. Both stents are flexible thin strut stents eluting sirolimus-analogue drugs targeting at mammalian target of rapamycin. The advantages that Resolute Integrity™ stent strut is quite thin and coated with highly biocompatible polymer and BioMatrix™ stent has the abluminal drug coating system with biodegradable polymer might provide clinical studies showing that both stents are quite safe as well as efficacious. Moreover, recent report showed that continuation of clopidogrel for only 3 months after implantation of Endeavor stent seems to be safe in low-to-moderate coronary artery risk group. Based on these clinical evidences, the duration of DAPT continuation for 12 months or less after implantation of Resolute Integrity™ or BioMatrix™ stent, 'the second generation DES', would be safe, however, there are no data available about this. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the safety of 6-months or 12-months maintenance of DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using Resolute Integrity™ or BioMatrix™ stent.
Interventions
DRUG6-month dual anti-platelet therapy
Aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor after percutaneous coronary intervention continues for 6 months
DRUG12-month dual anti-platelet therapy
Aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor after percutaneous coronary intervention continues for 12 months
Zotarolimus eluting stent is applied to coronary stenotic lesion
DEVICEBiolimus eluting stent
Biolimus eluting stent is applied to coronary stenotic lesion
Sponsors
Gangnam Severance Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Subject must be at least 20 years of age. 2. Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g. stable angina, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, silent ischemia, positive functional study or a reversible changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia). 3. Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving the Resolute Integrity or BioMatrix stent and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.
Exclusion criteria
1. Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction 2. The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, zotarolimus, biolimus, contrast media 3. Clinical conditions requiring systemic immune suppression over 2 weeks or anti-cancer therapy 4. Prior history of the following presentations: Thromboembolic disease, Stent thrombosis 5. Pregnant women or women with childbearing potential, unless a recent pregnancy test is negative, who possibly plan to become pregnant any time after enrollment into this study. 6. History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or will refuse blood transfusions. 7. Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months, or major surgery within 2 months. 8. Current known current platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3 or Hgb \<10 g/dL. 9. Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \< 1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment 10. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35% 11. Patients with cardiogenic shock 12. Creatinine level \> 2.4mg/dL 13. Severe hepatic dysfunction (aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase ≥ 3 times upper normal reference values)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| A composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, target vessel MI and ischemia driven-target lesion revascularization; TLR) | 12 months | 1. Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (eg, MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, and all procedure-related deaths, including those related to concomitant treatment, will be classified as cardiac death. 2. MI Classification and Criteria for Diagnosis is defined by the Academic Research Consortium 3. TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLRs should be classified prospectively as clinically indicated\* or not clinically indicated by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory should verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement. |
Outcome results
None listed