Skip to content

ALXN1210 Versus Eculizumab in Adult Participants With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) Currently Treated With Eculizumab

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study of ALXN1210 Versus Eculizumab in Adult Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) Currently Treated With Eculizumab

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03056040
Enrollment
202
Registered
2017-02-16
Start date
2017-05-17
Completion date
2022-02-21
Last updated
2025-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH)

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study was to assess the noninferiority of ravulizumab compared to eculizumab in adult participants with PNH who were clinically stable after having been treated with eculizumab for at least 6 months.

Detailed description

The study consisted of a 4-week Screening Period and a 26-week Randomized Treatment Period (Primary Evaluation Period). After completion of the Primary Evaluation Period, all participants had the opportunity to enter the Extension Period, wherein participants will receive ravulizumab for up to 4 years.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALRavulizumab

All treatments were given as intravenous (IV) infusions. For participants weighing ≥40 to \<60 kilograms (kg): 2400 mg was given as a single loading dose, followed by 3000 mg as maintenance dose. For participants weighing ≥60 to \<100 kg: 2700 mg was given as a loading dose, followed by 3300 mg as maintenance dose. For participants weighing ≥100 kg: 3000 mg was given as a loading dose, followed by 3600 mg as maintenance dose.

BIOLOGICALEculizumab

All treatments were given as IV infusions. Participants received 900 mg of eculizumab q2w.

Sponsors

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female ≥18 years of age. 2. Treated with eculizumab for PNH for at least 6 months prior to Day 1. 3. Lactate dehydrogenase level ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening. 4. PNH diagnosis confirmed by documented by high-sensitivity flow cytometry. 5. Documented meningococcal vaccination not more than 3 years prior to, or at the time of, initiating study treatment. 6. Female participants of childbearing potential must use highly effective contraception starting at screening and continuing until at least 8 months after the last dose of ravulizumab. 7. Willing and able to give written informed consent and comply with study visit schedule.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of bone marrow transplantation. 2. Body weight \<40 kilograms at screening. 3. History of or ongoing major cardiac, pulmonary, renal, endocrine, or hepatic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor, would preclude participation. 4. Unstable medical conditions (for example, myocardial ischemia, active gastrointestinal bleeding, severe congestive heart failure, anticipated need for major surgery within 6 months of randomization, or coexisting chronic anemia unrelated to PNH). 5. Female participants who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or who have a positive pregnancy test at screening or Day 1. 6. Participation in another interventional clinical study or use of any experimental therapy within 30 days before initiation of study treatment on Day 1 in this study or within 5 half-lives of that investigational product, whichever is greater.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change In Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels From Baseline To Day 183Baseline, Day 183Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is an indicator of intravascular hemolysis that occurs in participants with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. A decrease in LDH indicates reduction (improvement) in hemolysis. Baseline was defined as the average of all available on-study assessments prior to the first study drug infusion. The percent change in LDH was analyzed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the fixed, categorical effects of treatment, study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction, as well as the continuous, fixed covariate of baseline LDH and the stratification randomization indicator of packed red blood cells transfusion history (yes/no within 12 months prior to Day 1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline To Day 183 In Functional Assessment Of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScoresBaseline, Day 183FACIT-Fatigue score ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment value prior to first study drug dose. Change in FACIT-Fatigue score from Baseline to Day 183 was analyzed using an MMRM with the fixed, categorical effects of treatment, the stratification randomization indicator of packed red blood cells transfusion history (yes/no within 12 months prior to Day 1), study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction, as well as the continuous fixed covariate of Baseline FACIT-Fatigue score.
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance Through Day 183Baseline through Day 183Transfusion avoidance was defined as the percentage of participants who remained transfusion free and did not require a transfusion per protocol-specified guidelines (hemoglobin value of ≤9 g/dL with signs or symptoms of sufficient severity to warrant a transfusion, or a hemoglobin value of ≤7 g/dL regardless of presence of clinical signs or symptoms) through Day 183.
Percentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin Levels Through Day 183Baseline through Day 183Stabilized hemoglobin was defined as avoidance of a ≥2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from Baseline in the absence of transfusion through Day 183.
Number Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis Through Day 183Baseline through Day 183Breakthrough hemolysis (BTH) was defined as at least one new or worsening symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, dyspnea, anemia \[hemoglobin \<10 grams (g)/deciliter (dL)\], major adverse vascular event \[including thrombosis\], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated LDH ≥2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
Change From Baseline To End of Study In FACIT-Fatigue Scores Through End of StudyBaseline, End of Study (up to 4 years)FACIT-Fatigue score ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment value prior to first study drug dose. Change in FACIT-Fatigue score from Baseline to Day 183 was analyzed using an MMRM with the fixed, categorical effects of treatment, the stratification randomization indicator of packed red blood cells transfusion history (yes/no within 12 months prior to Day 1), study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction, as well as the continuous fixed covariate of Baseline FACIT-Fatigue score.
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance Through End of StudyBaseline through end of study (up to 4 years)Transfusion avoidance was defined as the percentage of participants who remained transfusion free and did not require a transfusion per protocol-specified guidelines (hemoglobin value of ≤9 g/dL with signs or symptoms of sufficient severity to warrant a transfusion, or a hemoglobin value of ≤7 g/dL regardless of presence of clinical signs or symptoms) through the end of study.
Percentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin Levels Through End of StudyBaseline through end of study (up to 4 years)Stabilized hemoglobin was defined as avoidance of a ≥2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from Baseline in the absence of transfusion through end of study.
Number Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis Through End of StudyBaseline through end of study (up to 4 years)BTH was defined as at least one new or worsening symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, dyspnea, anemia \[hemoglobin \<10 g/dL\], major adverse vascular event \[including thrombosis\], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated LDH ≥2 times the ULN.

Countries

Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were stratified into 1 of 2 groups based on their transfusion history. Stratified participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ravulizumab or eculizumab.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ravulizumab/Ravulizumab
On Day 1, participants received weight-based doses of ravulizumab ranging from 2400 to 3000 mg. Thereafter, weight- based doses of ravulizumab ranging from 3000 to 3600 mg were administered on Days 15, 71, and 127. After completion of the 26-week Primary Evaluation Period, participants had the opportunity to enter the Extension Period, wherein participants received weight-based doses of ravulizumab for up to 4 years.
97
Eculizumab/Ravulizumab
Participants received 900 mg of eculizumab q2w for 26 weeks. After completion of the 26-week Primary Evaluation Period, participants had the opportunity to enter the Extension Period, wherein participants received weight-based doses of ravulizumab for up to 4 years.
98
Total195

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Extension PeriodDeath03
Extension PeriodLost to Follow-up01
Extension PeriodPhysician Decision33
Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Subject10
Primary Evaluation PeriodLack of Efficacy01
Primary Evaluation PeriodPregnancy01
Primary Evaluation PeriodRandomized, not treated11
Primary Evaluation PeriodWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRavulizumab/RavulizumabEculizumab/RavulizumabTotal
Age, Continuous46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.41
48.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.97
47.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.19
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
76 Participants77 Participants153 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
23 participants19 participants42 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
5 participants3 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
13 participants13 participants26 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
50 participants61 participants111 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants50 Participants97 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants48 Participants98 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 970 / 980 / 963 / 95
other
Total, other adverse events
72 / 9785 / 9883 / 9685 / 95
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 978 / 9826 / 9633 / 95

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change In Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels From Baseline To Day 183

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is an indicator of intravascular hemolysis that occurs in participants with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. A decrease in LDH indicates reduction (improvement) in hemolysis. Baseline was defined as the average of all available on-study assessments prior to the first study drug infusion. The percent change in LDH was analyzed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the fixed, categorical effects of treatment, study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction, as well as the continuous, fixed covariate of baseline LDH and the stratification randomization indicator of packed red blood cells transfusion history (yes/no within 12 months prior to Day 1).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 183

Population: Full Analysis Set: All participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment (ravulizumab or eculizumab).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ravulizumab/RavulizumabPercent Change In Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels From Baseline To Day 183-0.82 percent change
Eculizumab/RavulizumabPercent Change In Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels From Baseline To Day 1838.39 percent change
Comparison: Adjusting for a possible 10% dropout rate, a minimum of 192 participants were estimated to provide 90% power to demonstrate noninferiority of ravulizumab to eculizumab.95% CI: [-18.84, 0.42]
Secondary

Change From Baseline To Day 183 In Functional Assessment Of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores

FACIT-Fatigue score ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment value prior to first study drug dose. Change in FACIT-Fatigue score from Baseline to Day 183 was analyzed using an MMRM with the fixed, categorical effects of treatment, the stratification randomization indicator of packed red blood cells transfusion history (yes/no within 12 months prior to Day 1), study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction, as well as the continuous fixed covariate of Baseline FACIT-Fatigue score.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 183

Population: Full Analysis Set: All participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment (ravulizumab or eculizumab).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ravulizumab/RavulizumabChange From Baseline To Day 183 In Functional Assessment Of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores2.01 units on a scale
Eculizumab/RavulizumabChange From Baseline To Day 183 In Functional Assessment Of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores0.54 units on a scale
95% CI: [-0.21, 3.15]
Secondary

Change From Baseline To End of Study In FACIT-Fatigue Scores Through End of Study

FACIT-Fatigue score ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment value prior to first study drug dose. Change in FACIT-Fatigue score from Baseline to Day 183 was analyzed using an MMRM with the fixed, categorical effects of treatment, the stratification randomization indicator of packed red blood cells transfusion history (yes/no within 12 months prior to Day 1), study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction, as well as the continuous fixed covariate of Baseline FACIT-Fatigue score.

Time frame: Baseline, End of Study (up to 4 years)

Population: Full Analysis Set: All participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment (ravulizumab or eculizumab). Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ravulizumab/RavulizumabChange From Baseline To End of Study In FACIT-Fatigue Scores Through End of Study-1.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.694
Eculizumab/RavulizumabChange From Baseline To End of Study In FACIT-Fatigue Scores Through End of Study0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.944
Secondary

Number Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis Through Day 183

Breakthrough hemolysis (BTH) was defined as at least one new or worsening symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, dyspnea, anemia \[hemoglobin \<10 grams (g)/deciliter (dL)\], major adverse vascular event \[including thrombosis\], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated LDH ≥2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).

Time frame: Baseline through Day 183

Population: Full Analysis Set: All participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment (ravulizumab or eculizumab).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ravulizumab/RavulizumabNumber Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis Through Day 1830 number of participants
Eculizumab/RavulizumabNumber Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis Through Day 1835 number of participants
Comparison: A difference in the percentages of participants with BTH was calculated between the ravulizumab and eculizumab treatment groups, along with a 95% CI for the difference using the stratified Newcombe CI method. The stratification factor observed was transfusion history within 1 year prior to first dose of study drug.95% CI: [-18.99, 8.89]
Secondary

Number Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis Through End of Study

BTH was defined as at least one new or worsening symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, dyspnea, anemia \[hemoglobin \<10 g/dL\], major adverse vascular event \[including thrombosis\], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated LDH ≥2 times the ULN.

Time frame: Baseline through end of study (up to 4 years)

Population: Full Analysis Set: All participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment (ravulizumab or eculizumab). Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ravulizumab/RavulizumabNumber Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis Through End of Study9 number of participants
Eculizumab/RavulizumabNumber Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis Through End of Study6 number of participants
Secondary

Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance Through Day 183

Transfusion avoidance was defined as the percentage of participants who remained transfusion free and did not require a transfusion per protocol-specified guidelines (hemoglobin value of ≤9 g/dL with signs or symptoms of sufficient severity to warrant a transfusion, or a hemoglobin value of ≤7 g/dL regardless of presence of clinical signs or symptoms) through Day 183.

Time frame: Baseline through Day 183

Population: Full Analysis Set: All participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment (ravulizumab or eculizumab).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ravulizumab/RavulizumabPercentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance Through Day 18387.6 percentage of participants
Eculizumab/RavulizumabPercentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance Through Day 18382.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: A difference in the percentages of participants achieving transfusion avoidance was calculated between the ravulizumab and eculizumab treatment groups, along with a 95% CI for the difference using the stratified Newcombe CI method. The stratification factor observed was transfusion history within 1 year prior to first dose of study drug95% CI: [-4.27, 15.68]
Secondary

Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance Through End of Study

Transfusion avoidance was defined as the percentage of participants who remained transfusion free and did not require a transfusion per protocol-specified guidelines (hemoglobin value of ≤9 g/dL with signs or symptoms of sufficient severity to warrant a transfusion, or a hemoglobin value of ≤7 g/dL regardless of presence of clinical signs or symptoms) through the end of study.

Time frame: Baseline through end of study (up to 4 years)

Population: Full Analysis Set: All participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment (ravulizumab or eculizumab). Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ravulizumab/RavulizumabPercentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance Through End of Study70.83 percentage of participants
Eculizumab/RavulizumabPercentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance Through End of Study70.53 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin Levels Through Day 183

Stabilized hemoglobin was defined as avoidance of a ≥2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from Baseline in the absence of transfusion through Day 183.

Time frame: Baseline through Day 183

Population: Full Analysis Set: All participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment (ravulizumab or eculizumab).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ravulizumab/RavulizumabPercentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin Levels Through Day 18376.3 percentage of participants
Eculizumab/RavulizumabPercentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin Levels Through Day 18375.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: A difference in the percentages of participants with stabilized hemoglobin was calculated between the ravulizumab and eculizumab treatment groups, along with a 95% CI for the difference using the stratified Newcombe CI method. The stratification factor observed was transfusion history within 1 year prior to first dose of study drug.95% CI: [-10.41, 13.31]
Secondary

Percentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin Levels Through End of Study

Stabilized hemoglobin was defined as avoidance of a ≥2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from Baseline in the absence of transfusion through end of study.

Time frame: Baseline through end of study (up to 4 years)

Population: Full Analysis Set: All participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment (ravulizumab or eculizumab). Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ravulizumab/RavulizumabPercentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin Levels Through End of Study58.33 percentage of participants
Eculizumab/RavulizumabPercentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin Levels Through End of Study67.37 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026