Skip to content

Fractional Micro-Needle Radiofrequency and I Botulinum Toxin A for Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis

A Comparative Study for Efficacy and Safety Between Fractional Micro-Needle Radiofrequency (FRM) and Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03054480
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-02-15
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2017-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis

Keywords

Fractional Micro-Needle Radiofrequency, Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A

Brief summary

Because of the limiting data about an efficacy and safety of fractional radiofrequency for the treatment of hyperhidrosis, this study aim to compare clinical efficacy by Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Score (HDSS) between Fractional Microneedle Radiofrequency device and intradermal Botulinum toxin type A injection for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis. The secondary objectives to determine the improvement change of iodine starch test, total amount of sweat production by trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), patient's satisfaction and their quality of life by Dermatology Life Quality Index and side effect between the groups.

Interventions

DEVICEFractional Micro-Needle Radiofrequency
DRUGBotulinum toxin type A

Sponsors

Mae Fah Luang University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

RCT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Male or female subjects, age between 18-60 years * Healthy volunteers * Subjects who have experienced with excessive sweating on both sides of axillary areas and have a positive result for iodine starch test on the screening day * Willing to participant into the study and voluntary to sign in the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Active bacterial or fungal infection over tested area / axillae * Pregnancy and breast feeding * Previously underwent the surgical treatment such as radical resection of sweat glands for primary axillary hyperhidrosis * Currently being treated with intradermal botulinum toxin type A injection at axillary area for less than 12 months * Currently being inserted the cardiac pace maker or any other internal electronic devices * Secondary hyperhidrosis caused by hyperthyroidism, drug induced, abnormal autonomic or neurological disorder that affect sweat gland * Allergy to botulinum toxin type A * Known contact allergy to iodine * Unable to follow and comply to the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change of Hyperhidrosis disease severity score (HDSS) at week-12 with the baseline12 weeksHyperhidrosis disease severity score will be assessed by study subjects that is categorized to 4 levels; (1) my axillary sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities (2) my axillary sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities (3) my axillary sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities (4) my axillary sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Iodine starch testbaseline, week 4 and week 12Qualitative test used to evaluate sudo-motor function (sweating) which method is to apply iodine solution to the skin. Once dry, the area is dusted with cornstarch or potato flour then sweating is encouraged. When sweat reaches the surface of the skin the starch and iodine combine causing a dramatic color change from yellow to dark blue allowing sweat production to be actively visualized. Photograph from iodine starch test will be assessed by two independent clinical assessors who are blinded to study protocol and grading with score. The investigators will prepare the photo with pre- and post-treatment set. Each set will contain 6 photos, 3 photos from the left and 3 photos from the right. Prepare by using Microsoft PowerPoint program, on each slide will contain 2 photos, pre-treatment photos on the left and post treatment photos on the right. The paired photos will be assessed and graded the score at different time points (4 and 12 weeks) on each side of axilla
Participants' satisfaction assessmentweek 4 and week 12An assessment will be determined at the endpoint visit (4th-12thweek) after the treatment by study subjects by Quartile rating scale on each side of axilla. Quartile rating scale by comparing with the baseline that is categorized to 4 levels; (3) greatly satisfy with treatment result (2) moderately satisfy with treatment result (1) slightly satisfy with treatment result (0) No different with treatment result.
Adverse effect12 weeksSide effect

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026