Skip to content

Evaluating the Indego Exoskeleton for Persons With Hemiplegia Due to CVA

Evaluating the Indego Exoskeleton for Persons With Hemiplegia Due to CVA

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03054064
Enrollment
48
Registered
2017-02-15
Start date
2017-02-21
Completion date
2018-01-17
Last updated
2020-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Hemiplegia, Stroke

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Indego exoskeleton as a gait training tool for individuals with hemiplegia due to Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA).

Interventions

Six study sessions including five Indego training sessions over two weeks.

Sponsors

Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
CollaboratorOTHER
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Sheltering Arms Physical Rehabilitation Hospitals
CollaboratorOTHER
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
CollaboratorOTHER
Kessler Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Charles Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
TIRR Memorial Hermann
CollaboratorOTHER
Rusk Rehabilitation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Height 5'1 to 6'3 (acceptable height may vary by a few inches depending on femur length) * Weight 250 pounds or less * History of one sided ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with resultant hemiparesis * Manual Muscle Test (MMT) 4/5 in at least upper extremity * No restrictions on time since stroke (acuity), but all subjects need to be cleared by MD for locomotor training * No other brain abnormalities or neurological diseases/disorders * Has not been diagnosed with more than one stroke * Passive range of motion (PROM) at shoulders, trunk, hips, knees and ankles within functional limits for safe gait * Skin intact where interfaces with Indego device * Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) for spasticity 3 or less in the lower extremities * Absence of complicating physical or mental conditions as determined by MD that would preclude the individual from safely participating in gait training * Must be able to follow directions and communicate basic needs, demonstrated by a Mini- Mental State Exam (MMSE) score of 18 or greater

Exclusion criteria

* Failure to meet all inclusion criteria * Pregnancy * Colostomy bag * Uncontrolled/untreated hyper- or hypotension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of Individuals With Hemiplegia Due to CVA Using the Indego Measured Through Reported Subject Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events2 weeksSafety of individuals with hemiplegia due to CVA using the Indego measured through reported Subject Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth Scale2 weeksSpasticity measured with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) 0 - No increase in muscle tone 1 - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the range of movement (ROM) 2 - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved 3 - Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult 4 - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
Activity Measured by Functional Ambulation Category2 weeksActivity measured by Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) 1. unable to ambulate/ambulates only in parallel bars/requires supervision or physical assistance from \> 1 person 2. requires manual contact of one person during ambulation on level surfaces/manual contact is continuous and necessary to support body weight and/or to maintain balance or assist coordination 3. requires manual contact of one person during ambulation on level surfaces/manual contact is continuous or intermittent light touch to assist balance or coordination 4. ambulation occurs on level surfaces without manual contact of another person/requires stand-by guarding of one person because of poor judgment, questionable cardiac status, or the need for verbal cuing to complete the task 5. ambulation is independent on level surfaces/requires supervision/physical assistance to negotiate stairs, inclines, or unlevel surfaces 6. ambulation is independent on unlevel and level surfaces, stairs and inclines
Gait Speed (Without Indego) Measured With 10 Meter Walk Test2 weeks10 Meter Walk Test (MWT) without Indego to measure gait speed
Pain Measured With Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale2 weeksPain measured with Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale Face 0: no particular expression or smile 1. occasional grimace or frown, withdrawn, disinterested 2. frequent to constant frown, clenched jaw, quivering chin Legs 0: normal position or relaxed 1. uneasy, restless, tense 2. kicking, or legs drawn up Activity 0: lying quietly, normal position, moves easily 1. squirming, shifting back and forth, tense 2. arched, rigid, or jerking Cry 0: no cry (awake or asleep) 1. moans or whimpers, occasional complaint 2. crying steadily, screams or sobs, frequent complaints Consolability 0: content, relaxed 1. reassured by occasional touching, hugging, or being talked to, distractable 2. difficult to console or comfort Minimum score: 0 Maximum Score: 10

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Enrolled Subjects
All enrolled subjects will receive gait training with the Indego. Indego Exoskeleton: Six study sessions including five Indego training sessions over two weeks.
42
Total42

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyBladder Issue1
Overall StudyChange in Status1
Overall StudyHigh Blood Pressure1
Overall StudyInvestigator Decision2
Overall StudyLower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Enrolled Subjects
Acuity of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
Acute
3 Participants
Acuity of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
Chronic
33 Participants
Acuity of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
Subacute
6 Participants
Age, Continuous59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Hispanic, Latino or other Spanish origin
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
25 Participants
Severity of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
Mild
4 Participants
Severity of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
Moderate
10 Participants
Severity of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
Severe
15 Participants
Severity of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
Very Severe
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Safety of Individuals With Hemiplegia Due to CVA Using the Indego Measured Through Reported Subject Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

Safety of individuals with hemiplegia due to CVA using the Indego measured through reported Subject Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Enrolled SubjectsSafety of Individuals With Hemiplegia Due to CVA Using the Indego Measured Through Reported Subject Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsTrial-related Adverse Events3 Events
All Enrolled SubjectsSafety of Individuals With Hemiplegia Due to CVA Using the Indego Measured Through Reported Subject Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsTrial-related Serious Adverse Events0 Events
Secondary

Activity Measured by Functional Ambulation Category

Activity measured by Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) 1. unable to ambulate/ambulates only in parallel bars/requires supervision or physical assistance from \> 1 person 2. requires manual contact of one person during ambulation on level surfaces/manual contact is continuous and necessary to support body weight and/or to maintain balance or assist coordination 3. requires manual contact of one person during ambulation on level surfaces/manual contact is continuous or intermittent light touch to assist balance or coordination 4. ambulation occurs on level surfaces without manual contact of another person/requires stand-by guarding of one person because of poor judgment, questionable cardiac status, or the need for verbal cuing to complete the task 5. ambulation is independent on level surfaces/requires supervision/physical assistance to negotiate stairs, inclines, or unlevel surfaces 6. ambulation is independent on unlevel and level surfaces, stairs and inclines

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Enrolled SubjectsActivity Measured by Functional Ambulation CategoryAverage FAC Session 15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
All Enrolled SubjectsActivity Measured by Functional Ambulation CategoryAverage FAC Session 65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Gait Speed (Without Indego) Measured With 10 Meter Walk Test

10 Meter Walk Test (MWT) without Indego to measure gait speed

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Enrolled SubjectsGait Speed (Without Indego) Measured With 10 Meter Walk TestAverage 10 MWT time Session 124.4 secondsStandard Deviation 20.4
All Enrolled SubjectsGait Speed (Without Indego) Measured With 10 Meter Walk TestAverage 10 MWT time Session 619.4 secondsStandard Deviation 12.9
Secondary

Pain Measured With Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale

Pain measured with Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale Face 0: no particular expression or smile 1. occasional grimace or frown, withdrawn, disinterested 2. frequent to constant frown, clenched jaw, quivering chin Legs 0: normal position or relaxed 1. uneasy, restless, tense 2. kicking, or legs drawn up Activity 0: lying quietly, normal position, moves easily 1. squirming, shifting back and forth, tense 2. arched, rigid, or jerking Cry 0: no cry (awake or asleep) 1. moans or whimpers, occasional complaint 2. crying steadily, screams or sobs, frequent complaints Consolability 0: content, relaxed 1. reassured by occasional touching, hugging, or being talked to, distractable 2. difficult to console or comfort Minimum score: 0 Maximum Score: 10

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Enrolled SubjectsPain Measured With Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability ScaleAverage FLACC Session 10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
All Enrolled SubjectsPain Measured With Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability ScaleAverage FLACC Session 60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Spasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth Scale

Spasticity measured with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) 0 - No increase in muscle tone 1 - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the range of movement (ROM) 2 - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved 3 - Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult 4 - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Enrolled SubjectsSpasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth ScaleAverage MAS Right UE Session 11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
All Enrolled SubjectsSpasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth ScaleAverage MAS Left UE Session 11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
All Enrolled SubjectsSpasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth ScaleAverage MAS Right LE Session 11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
All Enrolled SubjectsSpasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth ScaleAverage MAS Left LE Session 11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
All Enrolled SubjectsSpasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth ScaleAverage MAS Right UE Session 61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
All Enrolled SubjectsSpasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth ScaleAverage MAS Left UE Session 61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
All Enrolled SubjectsSpasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth ScaleAverage MAS Right LE Session 61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
All Enrolled SubjectsSpasticity of Bilateral Upper Extremities (UE) and Lower Extremities (LE) Measured With Modified Ashworth ScaleAverage MAS Left LE Session 61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026