Skip to content

Placental Membrane for Root Coverage

Treatment of Gingival Recession Using a Coronally Advanced Flap Procedure With or Without Placental Membrane

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03053921
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-02-15
Start date
2015-08-19
Completion date
2016-06-15
Last updated
2017-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Keywords

gingival recession, Zuchellis technique,, placental membrane

Brief summary

Aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of placental membrane with coronally advanced flap in covering single and multiple Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects.

Detailed description

STUDY DESIGN A total number of 60 teeth in 15 subjects were selected. Patients with bilateral Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects in the maxillary or mandibular anterior and premolar region were selected and divided into two groups using a split mouth design. GroupI (Control) -30 recession defects treated with coronally advanced flap alone, using Zucchelli's technique. Group II (Test) - 30 recession defects treated with coronally advanced flap, using Zucchelli's technique along with placental membrane. . CLINICAL PARAMETERS: 1. Probing Pocket Depth(PPD) 2. Clinical Attachment Level(CAL) 3. Height of Gingival Recession(HGR) 4. Width of Gingival Recession(WGR) 5. Width of Keratinized Gingiva(WKG) The clinical parameters were assessed & recorded on 0 day, 90th day and 180th day

Interventions

PROCEDURErecession coverage

recession coverage done using Zuchellis technique

PROCEDURErecession coverage and membrane

recession coverage done using Zuchellis technique with placental membrane

Sponsors

Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
23 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients within the age group 23 to 55 years 2. Bilateral, upper or lower, Miller's class I and Class II gingival recession defects confined to the anterior and premolar region. 3. Presence of identifiable cemento-enamel junction 4. Presence of keratinized tissue apical to the exposed root

Exclusion criteria

1. Systemic complications 2. Occlusal interferences 3. Any contraindication for periodontal surgery and taking medication which are known to interfere with periodontal tissue health or healing 4. Previous periodontal surgery on the involved site 5. Smokers 6. Pregnant and lactating mothers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Height of Gingival recession6 monthsThe height of gingival recession was measured from the cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin using Williams periodontal probe

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical attachment levelBaseline and 6 monthsClinical attachment level is measured as the distance between a fixed point on the crown such as cementoenamel junction to the base of the pocket using williams periodontal probe
Width of Keratinized GingivaBaseline and 6 monthsIt is measured as the distance from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction using williams periodontal probe

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026