Skip to content

THINC-it Vortioxetine - Sensitivity to Change

An Open-Label Clinical Trial Evaluating Sensitivity to Change in Cognition Using the THINC-it Following Treatment With Vortioxetine in Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03053362
Enrollment
158
Registered
2017-02-15
Start date
2017-05-24
Completion date
2018-08-08
Last updated
2025-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Change, Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity of the THINC-it tool, in measuring change in cognitive deficits in individuals with MDD after receiving vortioxetine.

Detailed description

Vortioxetine is used in this study as an antidepressant to improve mood, cognition and quality of life. Cognition refers to intellectual functions such as thinking, understanding, learning and remembering. Vortioxetine is approved by Health Canada for the treatment of MDD. In addition, vortioxetine has been reported to have a beneficial effect on cognitive areas such as executive function, attention/speed of processing, and memory, that are commonly affected negatively by MDD. Vortioxetine is recognized by Health Authorities in the EU and many other countries as having a benefit on cognitive dysfunction (loss of intellectual functions) in patients with MDD.Cognitive dysfunction is a highly persistent, pervasive and progressive abnormality in young adults (i.e., 18-65 years) with MDD. It has also been shown that among adults with MDD who are gainfully employed, measures of cognition are a greater determinant of overall workplace performance than is total depression symptom severity. Several lines of evidence indicate that cognitive deficits that persist between episodes of depression are critical determinants of functional recovery in the workplace. The functional implications associated with cognitive impairment provide the impetus for systematic evaluation, measurement and assessment of the domains of cognition expected to be impaired in this patient population. To date, no measurement tool has been sufficiently validated and/or determined to be sensitive to the cognitive deficits in younger adults with MDD. Major limitations of available comprehensive psychometric tools include relative lack of availability, cost, lack of access to most healthcare providers, and above all else, the lengthy time to administer. Moreover, the need for a psychometrist to interpret the results adds to the complexity and the costliness of such an endeavor. It is imperative that any tool recommended for clinical utility be aligned with the busy nature of a high-volume clinical practice. The ideal gold standard tool for assessing the presence of cognitive dysfunction in MDD in the clinical environment should include, but not be limited to, features such as good conceptual coverage of cognitive domains affected in MDD, good sensitivity and reliability, and it should be relatively uninfluenced by culture effects and practice effects. The tool would also need to be brief, easy to administer and interpret, and complement busy clinical practice. It is anticipated that the THINC-it tool will be free of charge and downloadable from the THINC-it website for use in the primary care and specialty setting. The THINC-it tool will be accessible via computers/tablets, will take 20 minutes to self-administer in a clinical setting, and the performance results will be immediately available.

Interventions

DRUGVortioxetine

Observing change in cognition using THINC-it tool in patients with MDD.

Digitalized cognitive test application administering the following cognitive test components: Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) Choice Reaction Time (CRT) One-back working memory tool Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-5 Depression (PDQ-5-D)

Sponsors

Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Determining the effectiveness of a new tool used to detect changes in cognition among individuals with MDD.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

MDD Population Inclusion Criteria: 1. The participant is able and willing to provide informed consent. 2. The participant is male or female 18-65 years of age. 3. The participant has received a current diagnosis of a major depressive episode (MDE) as part of MDD as per DSM-5 criteria. 4. The participant's current MDE is confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I 5.0.). 5. The participant is an outpatient of a psychiatric setting. 6. The participant has a MADRS score ≥ 26 at screening and baseline. 7. The participant's reported duration of the current MDE is at least 3 months. 8. At least one prior major depressive episode validated by previous treatment (e.g., guideline-informed pharmacotherapy and/or manual-based psychotherapy). 9. All participants will be screened for cognitive impairment based on DSST performance (pen-and-paper version) with a maximum baseline score of 70 correct symbols entered to avoid ceiling effects.

Exclusion criteria

1. Current alcohol and/or substance use disorder. 2. Presence of comorbid psychiatric disorder other than MDD that is a focus of clinical concern as confirmed by the M.I.N.I 5.0. 3. Medications approved and/or employed off-label for cognitive dysfunction (e.g., psychostimulants). 4. Any medication for a general medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect cognitive function (e.g., corticosteroids, beta-blockers). 5. Use of benzodiazepines within 12 hours of cognitive assessments. 6. Consumption of alcohol within 8 hours of cognitive assessments. 7. Recent use of marijuana as determined by a toxicology screen. 8. Physical, cognitive, or language impairments sufficient to adversely affect data derived from cognitive assessments. 9. Diagnosis reading disability or dyslexia. 10. Clinically significant learning disorder by history. 11. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the last 6 months. 12. History of moderate or severe head trauma (e.g., loss of consciousness for \>1 hour), other neurological disorders, or unstable systemic medical diseases that in the opinion of the investigator are likely to affect the central nervous system. 13. Pregnant and/or breastfeeding. 14. Received investigational agents as part of a separate study within 30 days of the screening visit. 15. Actively suicidal or evaluated as being a suicide risk (a score of \> 4 on the MADRS and/or per clinical judgment using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale). 16. Currently receiving treatment with Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) anti-depressants, antibiotics such as linezolid, or intravenous methylene blue. Healthy Control Population Inclusion Criteria: 1. No current or past history of mental disorder as evidenced by the M.I.N.I. 5.0 for DSM-IV. 2. No first-degree relative with an established diagnosis by a healthcare provider of a mood or psychiatric disorder. 3. No unstable medical disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognition Measured Using the THINC-it ToolBaseline and 8 weeksChange in cognition as measured by the objective assessments of cognition within the THINC-it tool. THINC-it is the name of the cognition tool and is not an acronym. The objective measurements that comprise the THINC-it tool include the Spotter task (Choice Reaction Time), Symbol Check task(1-back test),Trails task(Trails Making Test B), and Codebreaker task (Digit Symbol Substitution Test). The composite score from all four tests were converted to standard z-score. Higher z-scores indicate better cognition. A z-score of zero indicates population mean.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST)Baseline and 8 weeksChanges in cognition assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST). The outcome measure is the number of correct symbols copied by the participants. Higher scores indicate better performance (minimum score is 0 and maximum is 133).
Changes in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Trail Making Test - Part B (TMT-B)Baseline and 8 weeksChanges in cognition assessed by the TMT-B. The outcome measure is time in seconds, where greater time indicates worse performance.
Changes in Mood as Measured by the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Baseline and 8 weeksChanges in mood assessed by the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale \[MADRS\]. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60, where greater scores indicate worse depression.
Changes in the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (5-Item)Baseline and 8 weeksThe WHO-5 is a short questionnaire consisting of 5 simple and non-invasive questions, which tap into the subjective well-being of the respondents. The WHO-5 only contains positively phrased items. The respondent is asked to rate how well each of the 5 statements applies to him or her when considering the last 14 days. Each of the 5 items is scored from 5 (all of the time) to 0 (none of the time). The raw score therefore theoretically ranges from 0 (absence of well-being) to 25 (maximal well-being). A percent score out of 25 is reported.
Changes in Changes in Anhedonia From Baseline to Week 8Baseline and 8 weeksTo establish sensitivity to change in anhedonia using the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) total score in adults (18-65) with MDD treated with vortioxetine (10-20 mg flexibly dosed for 8 weeks). The SHAPS total score in adults ranges from 14 to 56. Higher score indicates more pleasure, with maximum of 56 points on the scale.
Changes in Global Functional Impairment Using the Sheehan Disability Scale Total ScoreBaseline and 8 weeksSheehan Disability Scale rates the extent to which his or her 1) work, 2) social life or leisure activities, and 3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. The numerical ratings of 0-10 can be translated into a percentage if desired. The three items may be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Healthy volunteers were recruited on an ongoing basis until 50 completed volunteers were enrolled. Eight participants began the study but did not complete the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Major Depressive Disorder Population
100 Individuals with DSM-5-defined MDD, aged 18-65 All participants receiving vortioxetine for a total of 8 weeks. Participants will receive10 mg/day on days 1-14 of the study treatment period, with the option to increase to vortioxetine 20 mg/day at the end of Week 2 based on physician's judgment. For the remaining 6 weeks, the dose of vortioxetine will be flexible at 10 or 20 mg/day as decided by a research doctor. Patients will receive the THINC-it over 3 time frame periods. The THINC-it comprised of: Spotter, Symbol Check, Codebreaker, Trails, and PDQ-5-D. Vortioxetine: Observing change in cognition using THINC-it tool in patients with MDD. THINC-it Tool: Digitalized cognitive test application administering the following cognitive test components: Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) Choice Reaction Time (CRT) One-back working memory tool Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-5 Depression (PDQ-5-D)
100
Healthy Control Population
50 Healthy Controls (18-65 years of age) matched on sex, age, and years of education THINC-it Tool: Digitalized cognitive test application administering the following cognitive test components: Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) Choice Reaction Time (CRT) One-back working memory tool Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-5 Depression (PDQ-5-D)
58
Total158

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealthy Control PopulationTotalMajor Depressive Disorder Population
Age, Continuous43.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.89
40.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.16
38.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.74
Baseline Digit Symbol Substitution Task Total Score (DSST)61.21 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.25
57.94 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.53
56.05 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
Baseline Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)1.64 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.41
20.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.66
31.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.54
Baseline THINC-it Tool Objective z-score-0.12 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.82
-0.08 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78
-0.05 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.76
Baseline Trail Making Test - Part B (TMT-B)70.59 time (seconds)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.14
72.08 time (seconds)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.06
72.94 time (seconds)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.59
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
16 Participants27 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
22 Participants43 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
20 Participants88 Participants68 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
58 participants158 participants100 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants94 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants64 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1000 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 1000 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1000 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Cognition Measured Using the THINC-it Tool

Change in cognition as measured by the objective assessments of cognition within the THINC-it tool. THINC-it is the name of the cognition tool and is not an acronym. The objective measurements that comprise the THINC-it tool include the Spotter task (Choice Reaction Time), Symbol Check task(1-back test),Trails task(Trails Making Test B), and Codebreaker task (Digit Symbol Substitution Test). The composite score from all four tests were converted to standard z-score. Higher z-scores indicate better cognition. A z-score of zero indicates population mean.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Participants were either lost to follow up or dropped out of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationCognition Measured Using the THINC-it ToolWeek 0-0.05 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.76
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationCognition Measured Using the THINC-it ToolWeek 80.12 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.73
Healthy Control PopulationCognition Measured Using the THINC-it ToolWeek 0-0.12 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.82
Healthy Control PopulationCognition Measured Using the THINC-it ToolWeek 80 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.77
Secondary

Changes in Changes in Anhedonia From Baseline to Week 8

To establish sensitivity to change in anhedonia using the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) total score in adults (18-65) with MDD treated with vortioxetine (10-20 mg flexibly dosed for 8 weeks). The SHAPS total score in adults ranges from 14 to 56. Higher score indicates more pleasure, with maximum of 56 points on the scale.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Participants dropped out or lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Changes in Anhedonia From Baseline to Week 8Week 035.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.74
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Changes in Anhedonia From Baseline to Week 8Week 840.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.49
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Changes in Anhedonia From Baseline to Week 8Week 051.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.53
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Changes in Anhedonia From Baseline to Week 8Week 850.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.76
Secondary

Changes in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST)

Changes in cognition assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST). The outcome measure is the number of correct symbols copied by the participants. Higher scores indicate better performance (minimum score is 0 and maximum is 133).

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Participants dropped out or lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST)Week 056.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST)Week 864.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.84
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST)Week 061.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.27
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST)Week 867.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.14
Secondary

Changes in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Trail Making Test - Part B (TMT-B)

Changes in cognition assessed by the TMT-B. The outcome measure is time in seconds, where greater time indicates worse performance.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Participants dropped out or lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Trail Making Test - Part B (TMT-B)Week 072.95 secondsStandard Deviation 30.6
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Trail Making Test - Part B (TMT-B)Week 862.72 secondsStandard Deviation 40.5
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Trail Making Test - Part B (TMT-B)Week 070.60 secondsStandard Deviation 29.14
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Cognitive Function Assessed by the Trail Making Test - Part B (TMT-B)Week 858.71 secondsStandard Deviation 21.08
Secondary

Changes in Global Functional Impairment Using the Sheehan Disability Scale Total Score

Sheehan Disability Scale rates the extent to which his or her 1) work, 2) social life or leisure activities, and 3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. The numerical ratings of 0-10 can be translated into a percentage if desired. The three items may be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Participants dropped out or lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Global Functional Impairment Using the Sheehan Disability Scale Total ScoreWeek 020.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Global Functional Impairment Using the Sheehan Disability Scale Total ScoreWeek 814.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.48
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Global Functional Impairment Using the Sheehan Disability Scale Total ScoreWeek 00.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.93
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Global Functional Impairment Using the Sheehan Disability Scale Total ScoreWeek 81.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.35
Secondary

Changes in Mood as Measured by the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

Changes in mood assessed by the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale \[MADRS\]. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60, where greater scores indicate worse depression.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Participants dropped out or lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Mood as Measured by the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Week 820.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.66
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in Mood as Measured by the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Week 031.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.54
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Mood as Measured by the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Week 81.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in Mood as Measured by the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Week 01.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Secondary

Changes in the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (5-Item)

The WHO-5 is a short questionnaire consisting of 5 simple and non-invasive questions, which tap into the subjective well-being of the respondents. The WHO-5 only contains positively phrased items. The respondent is asked to rate how well each of the 5 statements applies to him or her when considering the last 14 days. Each of the 5 items is scored from 5 (all of the time) to 0 (none of the time). The raw score therefore theoretically ranges from 0 (absence of well-being) to 25 (maximal well-being). A percent score out of 25 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Participants dropped out or lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (5-Item)Week 015.24 percent of maximum scoreStandard Deviation 11.45
Major Depressive Disorder PopulationChanges in the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (5-Item)Week 829.16 percent of maximum scoreStandard Deviation 20.35
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (5-Item)Week 072.42 percent of maximum scoreStandard Deviation 16.42
Healthy Control PopulationChanges in the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (5-Item)Week 873.60 percent of maximum scoreStandard Deviation 17.22

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026