Neuromuscular Blockade
Conditions
Keywords
anesthesiology, neuromuscular blockade, monitoring device
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of a hydraulically coupled twitch monitor compared to the EMG twitch monitor in current use to measure the extent of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Detailed description
Neuromuscular blockade (paralysis) is necessary for many surgical procedures to provide optimal surgical conditions. The extent of paralysis typically assessed during routine clinical care by examining the muscle response of the thumb (twitch) following delivery of a series of the train-of-four. Quantitative assessment of neuromuscular block can be assessed using electromyography (EMG) This technique measures action potential in the muscles of the thumb. The proposed method is a simple technique that can constructed with equipment that is readily available in most operating rooms. If validated, it would provide a simple method to assess quantitatively the extent of neuromuscular blockade and recovery of muscle strength.
Interventions
DEVICEStandard EMG Monitoring Device
Standard and in current usage, the electromyographic monitoring (EMG) device externally measures the action potential of the muscles of the thumb to determine the depth of neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia. This will be used as the clinical monitoring device and as a comparator.
DEVICEHydraulic Monitoring Device
The hydraulic monitoring device externally measures the pressure associated with thumb strength applied to the device to determine the depth of neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia. This will be compared to measurements using a current monitoring device in the same patient.
Sponsors
Society for Technology in Anesthesia
University of Miami
Richard H Epstein
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age \>18 2. Surgery is elective 3. Subject has been NPO for fluids for \>2 hours and for solids \>8 hours 4. General anesthesia with tracheal intubation is required 5. Mask ventilation is expected to be without difficulty 6. Subject voluntarily consents in writing to the protocol 7. ASA Physical Status 1-III (healthy individuals, those with mild comorbid conditions, or those with more serious co-morbid conditions that are well controlled)
Exclusion criteria
1. Lack of ability to provide written, informed consent 2. Airway examination indicates a likelihood of difficult mask ventilation 3. Symptoms of active reflux at the time of induction, at risk of having food in their stomach at the time of induction, expected abnormal response to non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers 4. Age ≤18 years 5. Pregnant women 6. Presence of carpal tunnel syndrome 7. Prisoners 8. General anesthesia not being provided 9. Tracheal intubation will not be performed 10. Anticipated length of surgery \<60 minutes 11. Emergent or urgent surgery 12. Disease that might alter the normal neuromuscular response to electrical stimulation (e.g., muscular dystrophies, myasthenia gravis, quadriplegia). 13. ASA Physical Status IV or V (individuals with major comorbid conditions that are a constant source of risk to health)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of Hydraulic Twitch Monitoring Device in Measuring Neuromuscular Blockade as Compared to EMG Monitoring Device, Assessed using Repeated Measures Bland-Altman Analysis | 12 months | To determine the accuracy (bias and precision) of a the monitoring device as compared to the electromyographic (EMG) monitor in measuring the extent of neuromuscular blockade in subjects undergoing general anesthesia. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed