Skip to content

Comparison of Adhesive Latch Device to Subcuticular Skin Closure at the Time of Cesarean Section

Comparison of Adhesive Latch Device to Subcuticular Skin Closure at the Time of Cesarean Section

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03052647
Enrollment
32
Registered
2017-02-14
Start date
2016-06-01
Completion date
2018-03-01
Last updated
2017-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wound

Keywords

dermaclip, subcuticular, cesarean section, staples, adhesive latch, rousseau

Brief summary

The objective of this study was to compare the an adhesive latch device ( Dermaclip) to subcuticular skin closure at the time of cesarean section. Currently, no studies exist comparing these two closure techniques. The hypothesis is dermaclip closure is faster than subcuticular closure. The null hypothesis is there is no difference in closure times. There is a study (see reference at bottom) that compares staples closure to subcuticular closure, but none comparing subcuticular to dermaclip closure. Dermaclip device is easily deployed and is expected to be as fast as staples closure compared to subcuticular as noted in the prior study referenced below.

Interventions

DEVICEDermaclip

Dermaclip is an adhesive latch device used for skin closure

subcuticular suture will be used as the device to close the skin in this arm

Sponsors

Rubino Ob-Gyn Group
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

computer randomized list of closure type opened from a sealed envelope on the day of surgery

Intervention model description

A control group of subcuticular closure and the experimental group is skin closure withthe adhesive latch device (dermaclip)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age greater than 18 2. Elective cesarean section 3. Term pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

1. Fever \>101F in the past 14 days 2. Antibiotics in the past 14 days 3. Suspected ongoing infection 4. Poorly controlled gestational diabetes 5. Allergic to adhesive

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of adhesive latch device to subcuticular skin closure at the time of cesarean section18 monthsThe time for skin closure between subcuticular and demaclip techniques will compared during cesarean section

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Infections as measured in centimeters of erythema18 months\- wound infections will measured in centimeters of redness/erythema around the infected area
Wound separation as measured in centimeters18 months\- wound separation will be recorded centimeters
Patient Satisfaction scores18 months\- patient satisfaction
Total surgery time18 months\- total surgery time
Pain Scores18 months\- pain scores using the visual analog pain scale (VAPS) system
BMI18 monthsBMI of participants bmi (in kg/m2, weight in kg, height, in meters)
Ethnicity18 monthsEthnic origin
Race18 monthsRace of participants
Age18 months\- age (years)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026