Skip to content

Occupational Therapy's Role in Promoting Community Wellness Utilizing Sit-Stand Workstations

Occupational Therapy's Role in Promoting Community Wellness: A Multi-modal Approach to Combat Sedentary Behavior in the Workplace Utilizing Sit-Stand Workstations

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03052426
Enrollment
18
Registered
2017-02-14
Start date
2017-02-27
Completion date
2017-08-27
Last updated
2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Pain, Musculoskeletal Strain, Sedentary Lifestyle

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to combat the growing global health issue of sedentary behavior and the associated health consequences of prolonged sitting in the workplace. The population of desk-based workers makes up a relatively large population and are an important target for this health promoting initiative with a focus on improving posture, encouraging movement, and fostering a more active and healthy business community. It's important to recognize that occupational therapy practitioners can contribute to community health promotion/disease prevention programs by the skill-set of practitioners to understand habits and routines that influence the adoption and maintenance of healthy behaviors.

Interventions

DEVICEErgotron WorkFit - TL

A sit to stand work station.

Sponsors

West Virginia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must spend \> 50% of their work day seated at the computer * Participants must be primarily English speaking * Participants must work within the Health Sciences Center building at West Virginia University

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who are less than 18 years of age * Participants who are not primarily English speaking * Participants who spend \<50% of their work day seated at the computer * Participants who do not work within the Health Sciences Center building at West Virginia University * Participants who are pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 Months3 monthsThree scales were compiled 1) aches and pains, 2) discomfort and 3) interference due to aches and pains. All three scales included 9 questions centered on the occurrence in body regions, including the neck, shoulder, upper and lower back, upper arms, forearm/wrist, hip, thigh, and knee/lower leg. Aches and Pains was on a 5 point scale, from 1) Never to 5) Several Times a Day. Uncomfortable was on a 4 point scale, ranging from 0) No Discomfort to 3) Very Uncomfortable. Interference was on a 4 point scale from 0) Not a problem to 3) Substantially interfered. Higher scores indicated more problems in each of these areas.
Reported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 Months6 monthsThree scales were compiled 1) aches and pains, 2) discomfort and 3) interference due to aches and pains. All three scales included 9 questions centered on the occurrence in body regions, including the neck, shoulder, upper and lower back, upper arms, forearm/wrist, hip, thigh, and knee/lower leg. Aches and Pains was on a 5 point scale, from 1) Never to 5) Several Times a Day. Uncomfortable was on a 4 point scale, ranging from 0) No Discomfort to 3) Very Uncomfortable. Interference was on a 4 point scale from 0) Not a problem to 3) Substantially interfered. Higher scores indicated more problems in each of these areas.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reported Musculoskeletal Discomfort at Work at 3 Months and 6 Months All Groups CombinedBeginning of study, 3 months, and 6 months (end of study)The Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire consists of three scales that were compiled 1) aches and pains, 2) discomfort and 3) interference due to aches and pains. All three scales included 9 questions centered on the occurrence in body regions, including the neck, shoulder, upper and lower back, upper arms, forearm/wrist, hip, thigh, and knee/lower leg. Aches and Pains was on a 5 point scale, from 1) Never to 5) Several Times a Day. Uncomfortable was on a 4 point scale, ranging from 0) No Discomfort to 3) Very Uncomfortable. Interference was on a 4 point scale from 0) Not a problem to 3) Substantially interfered. Higher scores indicated more problems in each of these areas.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
30 Minute Group
roup members will be required to alternate periods of sitting and standing every 30 minutes throughout their workday using the sit to stand workstation. Ergotron WorkFit - TL: A sit to stand work station.
6
60 Minute Group
roup members will be required to alternate periods of sitting and standing every 60 minutes throughout their workday using the sit to stand workstation. Ergotron WorkFit - TL: A sit to stand work station.
6
90 Minute Group
roup members will be required to alternate periods of sitting and standing every 90 minutes throughout their workday using the sit to stand workstation. Ergotron WorkFit - TL: A sit to stand work station.
6
Total18

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up201
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject010

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic30 Minute Group60 Minute GroupTotal90 Minute Group
Aches/Pains2.54 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84
2.26 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.55
2.28 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67
2.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
Aches/Pains Interfere with Work1.39 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.51
0.90 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.29
1.16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45
1.19 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
Age, Continuous53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.36
41.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.11
45.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.62
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.15
Employment
Full-Time
5 Participants6 Participants17 Participants6 Participants
Employment
Part-Time
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Income
30-60K
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Income
< 30K
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Income
60-90K
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Income
90+K
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Income
Did not report
3 Participants3 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Marital Status
Cohabitating
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Marital Status
Divorced
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Marital Status
Married
3 Participants2 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Marital Status
Single
1 Participants3 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Marital Status
Widowed
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Days Worked Per Week5 number of days worked/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
5 number of days worked/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
5 number of days worked/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
5 number of days worked/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
4 Participants5 Participants15 Participants6 Participants
Role
Administrative
3 Participants3 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Role
Managerial
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Role
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Role
Professional
3 Participants2 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants5 Participants14 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Total Hours Worked Per Week45.83 hours/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44
41 hours/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.76
43.11 hours/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.74
42.5 hours/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.81
Uncomfortable from Aches/Pains1.20 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.71
0.93 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.24
1.07 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49
1.07 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 60 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 60 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Reported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 Months

Three scales were compiled 1) aches and pains, 2) discomfort and 3) interference due to aches and pains. All three scales included 9 questions centered on the occurrence in body regions, including the neck, shoulder, upper and lower back, upper arms, forearm/wrist, hip, thigh, and knee/lower leg. Aches and Pains was on a 5 point scale, from 1) Never to 5) Several Times a Day. Uncomfortable was on a 4 point scale, ranging from 0) No Discomfort to 3) Very Uncomfortable. Interference was on a 4 point scale from 0) Not a problem to 3) Substantially interfered. Higher scores indicated more problems in each of these areas.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: At this point in the study there were still 16 individuals enrolled.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 MonthsUncomfortable from Aches0.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
30 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 MonthsAches and Pains1.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
30 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 MonthsInterference0.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
60 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 MonthsUncomfortable from Aches0.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
60 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 MonthsAches and Pains1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.12
60 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 MonthsInterference0.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
90 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 MonthsAches and Pains1.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
90 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 MonthsInterference0.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
90 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 3 MonthsUncomfortable from Aches0.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Comparison: Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis Tests and ChiSqaure analysis were completed for aches/pains at the three month time framep-value: 0.9327Chi-squared
Comparison: Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis Tests and ChiSqaure analysis were completed for discomfort at the three month time framep-value: 0.7523Chi-squared
Comparison: Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis Tests and ChiSqaure analysis were completed for interference at the three month time frame.p-value: 0.9196Chi-squared
Primary

Reported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 Months

Three scales were compiled 1) aches and pains, 2) discomfort and 3) interference due to aches and pains. All three scales included 9 questions centered on the occurrence in body regions, including the neck, shoulder, upper and lower back, upper arms, forearm/wrist, hip, thigh, and knee/lower leg. Aches and Pains was on a 5 point scale, from 1) Never to 5) Several Times a Day. Uncomfortable was on a 4 point scale, ranging from 0) No Discomfort to 3) Very Uncomfortable. Interference was on a 4 point scale from 0) Not a problem to 3) Substantially interfered. Higher scores indicated more problems in each of these areas.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 MonthsUncomfortable from Aches0.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
30 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 MonthsAches and Pains1.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
30 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 MonthsInterfere with Work0.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
60 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 MonthsUncomfortable from Aches0.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
60 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 MonthsAches and Pains1.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
60 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 MonthsInterfere with Work0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
90 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 MonthsAches and Pains1.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
90 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 MonthsInterfere with Work0.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
90 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort Per Group at 6 MonthsUncomfortable from Aches0.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Comparison: Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis Tests and ChiSquare Analysis were completedp-value: 0.6316Chi-squared
Comparison: Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis Tests and ChiSqaure analysis were completed for discomfort at the six month time frame.p-value: 0.2595Chi-squared
Comparison: Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis Tests and ChiSqaure analysis were completed for interference at the six month time framep-value: 0.4495Chi-squared
Secondary

Reported Musculoskeletal Discomfort at Work at 3 Months and 6 Months All Groups Combined

The Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire consists of three scales that were compiled 1) aches and pains, 2) discomfort and 3) interference due to aches and pains. All three scales included 9 questions centered on the occurrence in body regions, including the neck, shoulder, upper and lower back, upper arms, forearm/wrist, hip, thigh, and knee/lower leg. Aches and Pains was on a 5 point scale, from 1) Never to 5) Several Times a Day. Uncomfortable was on a 4 point scale, ranging from 0) No Discomfort to 3) Very Uncomfortable. Interference was on a 4 point scale from 0) Not a problem to 3) Substantially interfered. Higher scores indicated more problems in each of these areas.

Time frame: Beginning of study, 3 months, and 6 months (end of study)

Population: Secondary to the individual group sizes being small, we decided to do an analysis of all of the groups combined to determine if the intervention made any impact on musculoskeletal discomfort with use over time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort at Work at 3 Months and 6 Months All Groups CombinedAches/Pains1.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
30 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort at Work at 3 Months and 6 Months All Groups CombinedUncomfortable from Aches0.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
30 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort at Work at 3 Months and 6 Months All Groups CombinedInterfere with Work0.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
60 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort at Work at 3 Months and 6 Months All Groups CombinedAches/Pains1.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
60 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort at Work at 3 Months and 6 Months All Groups CombinedUncomfortable from Aches0.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
60 Minute GroupReported Musculoskeletal Discomfort at Work at 3 Months and 6 Months All Groups CombinedInterfere with Work0.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Comparison: Three and six month results were combined and compared to baseline data for each of the outcome variables. Repeated measures MANOVAs with pairwise comparisons were used to examine the decrease of variables over time from time 1 to times 2 and 3.p-value: <0.0001MANOVA
Comparison: Three and six month results were combined and compared to baseline data for each of the outcome variables. Repeated measures MANOVAs with pairwise comparisons were used to examine the decrease of variables over time from time 1 to times 2 and 3.p-value: =0.0006MANOVA
Comparison: We used repeated measures MANOVAs with pairwise comparisons to examine the decrease of the variables over time. Significant differences for within subjects by time were foundp-value: <0.0001MANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026