Skip to content

Improve Glaucoma Medication Adherence

Improving Glaucoma Medication Adherence

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03052257
Acronym
MAGIC
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-02-14
Start date
2017-08-09
Completion date
2021-03-01
Last updated
2024-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Keywords

Glaucoma, Disease management, Smart bottle

Brief summary

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial enrolling Veterans with medically treated glaucoma who report less than 100% adherence to the prescribed glaucoma therapy. Participants will be randomized to receive either a one-on-one session with a member of the research team discussing the disease process and strategies for administering eye drops (intervention) or a one-on-one session with a member of the research team discussing general eye health (control). All participants will be provided with a smart bottle to house their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened. For participants in the intervention arm only, a reminder function will be activated. The proportion or prescribed doses taken according to the monitor will be compared for the two groups.

Detailed description

The purpose if this study is to improve glaucoma medication adherence in Veterans with medically-treated glaucoma. The study design is a single-site randomized controlled trial. Specific Aim 1. Evaluate the impact of an intervention to improve glaucoma medication adherence among Veterans at 6-month follow up. Hypothesis 1: Veterans randomized to the intervention will have a greater proportion of prescribed glaucoma medication doses taken as measured by the electronic medication monitor in the 6 months following the intervention compared to Veterans randomized to the control arm. The primary outcome for hypothesis 1A is the proportion of prescribed doses taken according to the electronic monitor. Participants in both arms will receive the electronic monitor or smart bottle, which wirelessly transmits the date and time of opening of the smart bottle to the study team. From these medication events, the proportion of prescribed doses will be derived, defined as the ratio of the number of times the smart bottle was opened to the required number of doses prescribed according to the medical record over the period of time that the bottle is in use. For example, if a participant is advised to take his or her glaucoma drop twice a day for the 180 days that the bottle is in use and the smart bottle reveals 135 openings over the same time period, the proportion of prescribed doses taken is 37.5%. Specific Aim 2. Evaluate the impact of the intervention on intensification of glaucoma therapy among Veterans at 12-month follow-up. Hypothesis 2: The proportion of Veterans in the intervention arm that are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy, defined as addition of adjuvant glaucoma medication or recommendation for laser or glaucoma surgery will be less than the proportion of Veterans in the control arm who are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy in the 12 months following the intervention. Baseline data collection will include cataloging the current glaucoma medication regimen prescribed to the participant. Chart abstractions will be performed at 12 months following the baseline visit and intensification of glaucoma therapy will be defined as either 1) the addition of another glaucoma medication to the baseline regimen, 2) recommendation for glaucoma laser treatment, or 3) recommendation for glaucoma surgery in the 12 months following the baseline visit . The investigators will collect these data at 12 months because the Metrics study suggested that 55% of participants in the control arm will have intensification of therapy within one year. Specific Aim 3. Evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness and budget and workflow impacts of the intervention compared to usual care. Hypothesis 3: The intervention will be cost-effectiveness for the following ratios: 1) cost per percentage improvement in medication adherence; 2) cost per blindness averted; and 3) cost per quality-adjusted-life years saved. A direct measurement approach will be used to estimate per-patient intervention and control arm costs. Glaucoma-related health care utilization costs will be derived from VA administrative datasets. The cost estimates will be combined with observed improvement in medication adherence and reduction in escalation in therapy to estimate the first two incremental cost effectiveness ratios. Simulation using Markov modeling will be used to estimate the incremental cost per blindness averted and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Cost estimates and labor time data collected will be combined with glaucoma prevalence rates among Veterans to estimate overall budget and workload impacts to the VA healthcare system.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEducational - glaucoma

Discussion of glaucoma and the potential for blindness, facilitated by the glaucoma educator using a 3-dimensional model eye and photographic representation of glaucomatous vision loss; One-one-one demonstration of eye drop instillation techniques, Provision of a mnemonic aid which alerts the participant to missed doses; Review of the participant manual: An illustrated brochure on glaucoma and eye drop instillation. An individualized schedule for dosing of glaucoma medications. Individualized suggestions for improving adherence based on the subject's responses to the (SASES).

BEHAVIORALDose monitoring and reminder

Participants will be provided with a smart bottle to house one of their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened. For participants in the intervention arm only, a reminder through AdhereTech will be activated.

BEHAVIORALEducational - general

The control information session will include review of a Powerpoint presentation on general eye health, including but not specific to glaucoma.

BEHAVIORALDose monitoring

Participants will be provided with a smart bottle to house one of their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma \[primary open angle glaucoma, pigment dispersion glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, combined mechanism glaucoma, low tension glaucoma\] recorded in the medical record * Prescribed glaucoma eye drops, * Visual field performed within the last 9 months. * As visual field testing is standard care glaucoma and the investigators wish to establish baseline glaucoma severity, the investigators will require that subjects have a visual field test documented in the chart within 9 months of enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Prescribed Glaucoma Medication Doses Taken on ScheduleRandomization to 6 MonthsWill veterans randomized to the intervention have a greater proportion of prescribed glaucoma medication doses taken as measured by the electronic medication monitor in the 6 months following the intervention compared to Veterans randomized to the control arm? The electronic bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened. For participants in the intervention arm only, a reminder through the electronic bottle will be activated. The outcome measure is the proportion of prescribed doses taken with a minimum of Zero and a maximum of One; where higher scores indicate more adherence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VA Medical Resource Use and Costs6 monthsThe investigators will investigate the overall budget impacts to the VA healthcare system. The main intervention costs are labor inputs, consisting of the one-time fixed labor cost of training and the variable labor cost of conducting the adherence intervention. The VA healthcare system also incurs costs, such as administration, utilities, and custodial services that cannot be directly attributed to a given health care service but nonetheless should be included in the cost analysis.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
VA Healthcare Workflow Effectiveness12 monthsThe investigators will investigate the overall workload impacts to the VA healthcare system. Cost estimates and labor time data collected will be combined with glaucoma prevalence rates among Veterans to estimate overall workload impacts to the VA healthcare system.
Cost-effectiveness Compared to Usual Care for Cost Per Blindness Averted12 monthsWill the intervention be cost-effectiveness compared to usual care for cost per blindness averted
Number of Participants With Newly Prescribed Glaucoma Therapy12 MonthsWill the proportion of Veterans in the intervention arm that are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy be less than the proportion of Veterans in the control arm who are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy in the 12 months following the intervention? Baseline data collection will include cataloging the current glaucoma medication regimen prescribed to the participant. Chart abstractions will be performed at 12 months following the baseline visit and intensification of glaucoma therapy will be defined as either 1) the addition of another glaucoma medication to the baseline regimen, 2) recommendation for glaucoma laser treatment, or 3) recommendation for glaucoma surgery in the 12 months following the baseline visit .
VA Workflow Effectiveness12 monthsThe investigators will investigate the overall workload impacts to the VA healthcare system.
Within-Trial Cost-Effectiveness of Adherence6 monthsWill the intervention be cost-effectiveness compared to usual care? Total cost was calculated by adding the mean medical resource cost per patient to the cost of the intervention ($549) or the control ($48), then multiplying the total by the number of patients per group (100)
Total Cost at 6 Months6 monthsThe proportion of participants attaining equal or \>80% adherence as measured by electronic monitor, total intervention and medical resource costs, and incremental cost effectiveness ratios comparing intervention to control at 6 months.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Participants were randomized educational intervention developed to improve glaucoma medication adherence. This included a discussion of glaucoma and the potential for blindness, facilitated by the glaucoma educator using a 3-dimensional model eye and photographic representation of glaucomatous vision loss; One-one-one demonstration of eye drop instillation techniques, provision of a mnemonic aid which alerts the participant to missed doses; Review of the participant manual: An illustrated brochure on glaucoma and eye drop instillation, an individualized schedule for dosing of glaucoma medications. Individualized suggestions for improving adherence based on the subject's responses to the (SASES). Participants were provided with a smart bottle to house one of their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle recorded the date and time that the bottle was opened and a reminder through AdhereTech was activated.
100
Control
Participants randomized to receive general eye health educational session, the control information session included review of a PowerPoint presentation on general eye health, including but not specific to glaucoma. All participants were provided with a smart bottle to house one of their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle recorded the date and time that the bottle is opened.
100
Total200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33
Companion Status
Companion at Randomization
20 Participants21 Participants41 Participants
Companion Status
No Companion at Randomization
80 Participants79 Participants159 Participants
Doses Per Day of Monitored Medication
More Than One Dose Per Day
56 Participants57 Participants113 Participants
Doses Per Day of Monitored Medication
One Dose Per Day
44 Participants43 Participants87 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
90 Participants96 Participants186 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
66 Participants73 Participants139 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants21 Participants51 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 Participants100 Participants200 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants9 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
96 Participants91 Participants187 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 1002 / 100
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1000 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1002 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Prescribed Glaucoma Medication Doses Taken on Schedule

Will veterans randomized to the intervention have a greater proportion of prescribed glaucoma medication doses taken as measured by the electronic medication monitor in the 6 months following the intervention compared to Veterans randomized to the control arm? The electronic bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened. For participants in the intervention arm only, a reminder through the electronic bottle will be activated. The outcome measure is the proportion of prescribed doses taken with a minimum of Zero and a maximum of One; where higher scores indicate more adherence.

Time frame: Randomization to 6 Months

Population: 95 Intervention: Of the 100 randomized to Intervention - 2 subjects withdrew after randomization and 3 subjects excluded for not having at least 25 weeks of adherence data 97 Control: Of the 100 randomized to Control - 1 subject excluded by PI for not taking medication and 2 subjects excluded for not having at least 25 weeks of adherence data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
InterventionProportion of Prescribed Glaucoma Medication Doses Taken on Schedule.84 proportion of doses
ControlProportion of Prescribed Glaucoma Medication Doses Taken on Schedule0.62 proportion of doses
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.15, 0.3]Regression, Linear
Secondary

VA Medical Resource Use and Costs

The investigators will investigate the overall budget impacts to the VA healthcare system. The main intervention costs are labor inputs, consisting of the one-time fixed labor cost of training and the variable labor cost of conducting the adherence intervention. The VA healthcare system also incurs costs, such as administration, utilities, and custodial services that cannot be directly attributed to a given health care service but nonetheless should be included in the cost analysis.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 100 Intervention 100 Control

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionVA Medical Resource Use and Costs10947 USDStandard Deviation 19341
ControlVA Medical Resource Use and Costs12939 USDStandard Deviation 25199
Other Pre-specified

Cost-effectiveness Compared to Usual Care for Cost Per Blindness Averted

Will the intervention be cost-effectiveness compared to usual care for cost per blindness averted

Time frame: 12 months

Population: While the long-term goal of this research program is to reduce glaucoma-related blindness in Veterans; in the course of the study period no participants went blind. We were unable to calculate this hypothesized outcome.

Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Newly Prescribed Glaucoma Therapy

Will the proportion of Veterans in the intervention arm that are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy be less than the proportion of Veterans in the control arm who are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy in the 12 months following the intervention? Baseline data collection will include cataloging the current glaucoma medication regimen prescribed to the participant. Chart abstractions will be performed at 12 months following the baseline visit and intensification of glaucoma therapy will be defined as either 1) the addition of another glaucoma medication to the baseline regimen, 2) recommendation for glaucoma laser treatment, or 3) recommendation for glaucoma surgery in the 12 months following the baseline visit .

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: 200 randomized Veterans who are patients of the Durham VA Eye Clinic with medically-treated glaucoma.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With Newly Prescribed Glaucoma Therapy23 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Newly Prescribed Glaucoma Therapy24 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Total Cost at 6 Months

The proportion of participants attaining equal or \>80% adherence as measured by electronic monitor, total intervention and medical resource costs, and incremental cost effectiveness ratios comparing intervention to control at 6 months.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 100 Intervention (hypothetical cohort) 100 Control (hypothetical cohort)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionTotal Cost at 6 Months1,149,600 USD
ControlTotal Cost at 6 Months1,298,700 USD
Other Pre-specified

VA Healthcare Workflow Effectiveness

The investigators will investigate the overall workload impacts to the VA healthcare system. Cost estimates and labor time data collected will be combined with glaucoma prevalence rates among Veterans to estimate overall workload impacts to the VA healthcare system.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Workflow changed significantly over the course of the study such that this outcome became not feasible to assess. Over the time that participants were enrolled, we had multiple staff and doctor changes, not to mention the pandemic.

Other Pre-specified

VA Workflow Effectiveness

The investigators will investigate the overall workload impacts to the VA healthcare system.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Workflow changed significantly over the course of the study such that this outcome became not feasible to assess. Over the time that participants were enrolled, we had multiple staff and doctor changes, not to mention the pandemic.

Other Pre-specified

Within-Trial Cost-Effectiveness of Adherence

Will the intervention be cost-effectiveness compared to usual care? Total cost was calculated by adding the mean medical resource cost per patient to the cost of the intervention ($549) or the control ($48), then multiplying the total by the number of patients per group (100)

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionWithin-Trial Cost-Effectiveness of Adherence1,149,600 USD
ControlWithin-Trial Cost-Effectiveness of Adherence1,298,700 USD

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026