Skip to content

The British Heart Foundation SENIOR-RITA Trial

The British Heart Foundation Older Patients With Non-ST SEgmeNt elevatIOn myocaRdial Infarction Randomized Interventional TreAtment Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03052036
Acronym
SENIOR-RITA
Enrollment
1518
Registered
2017-02-14
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2029-06-30
Last updated
2024-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI

Keywords

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Brief summary

SENIOR-RITA is a multicentre prospective open-label trial randomizing patients presenting with type 1 NSTEMI aged ≥75 years between invasive and conservative treatment strategies, to compare time from randomisation to cardiovascular death or non-fatal MI

Detailed description

The population is getting older and heart artery disease is the biggest killer in the UK. Over recent years, there have been improvements in medications and technologies to treat it, but these have been primarily tested in younger patients. Previous research studies suggest that older patients (75 years and over) are not well represented in clinical research and these patients in particular those that are frail and those with co-morbidities are less likely to receive advanced medications and medical procedures. The current study will enrol patients 75 years and over, presenting with a heart attack. If patients agree to participate, they will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups. In the first group, patients will receive the latest medications recommended in heart attack. In the second group, in addition to these medications, patients will have coronary angiography. This will show whether they have any blockages in heart arteries. If appropriate, coronary revascularisation by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) commonly known as coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting, sometimes called CABG (a surgical procedure in which a blood vessel from the leg, arm or chest is used to bypass a narrowed section of a coronary artery) will be carried out. During the trial, frailty scores, cognition measures, co-morbidity indices, questionnaires on quality of life, NHS and personal social services utilization will be collected from the participant and in addition proxy quality of life information will be collected from the participant's carers. Investigators will evaluate which one of the two treatment groups will do better and live longer. Investigators will also collect information on their quality of life and frailty measures for a 5 year period. The trial hopes to recruit 2300 patients from approximately 30 centres across the UK.

Interventions

PROCEDURECoronary Angiography

Coronary angiography to determine location of blocked or narrowed arteries.

PROCEDURECoronary revascularisation

PCI or CABG will be performed following coronary angiography at the discretion of the treating cardiologist.

OTHEROptimal Medical Therapy

Patients to receive conservative treatment in the form of guideline recommended secondary prevention therapy including antiplatelet therapy, statins, ACE Inhibitors and beta blockers.

Sponsors

British Heart Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Newcastle University
CollaboratorOTHER
Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged ≥ 75 years * Type 1 NSTEMI during index hospitalisation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients presenting with STEMI or unstable angina * Patients with cardiogenic shock * Patients with known life expectancy \<1 year * Patients in whom neither the patient nor the consultee are able and willing to provide written informed consent * Previous inclusion in the BHF SENIOR-RITA trial * Inability to undergo invasive coronary angiography, such as no vascular access site, or absolute contraindication to coronary revascularisation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to cardiovascular death or non-fatal MI (defined by the fourth universal definition) from randomizationUp to 5 yearsTo determine the impact of a routine invasive strategy on cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) compared with a conservative treatment strategy in older patients (≥75 years) with NSTEMI.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrent myocardial infarctionUp to 5 years
Hospitalisation for heart failureUp to 5 years
Urgent coronary revascularisationUp to 5 years
Recurrent hospitalisation for myocardial infarctionUp to 5 years
StrokeUp to 5 years
Length of time spent at homeUp to 5 years
Fried and Rockwood frailty scoresUp to 5 years
All cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular death ratesUp to 5 years
Costs to the NHS and personal social servicesUp to 5 years
Incremental cost per QALY gained at 1 yearUp to 5 years
Procedural complicationsWithin 7 days of invasive carePerforation, myocardial infarction (Type 4a), coronary dissection, TIA, Death in Cath Lab, Aortic dissection
BleedingUp to 1 yearBleeding according to BARC Criteria
Renal replacement therapyWithin 7 days of invasive careNeed for renal replacement therapy
25% increase in serum creatinine concentrationWithin 7 days of invasive care25% increase in serum creatinine concentration from baseline (hospitalisation)
Quality of Life using EQ-5D-5L and quality adjusted life years (QALY)Up to 5 yearsQuality of life will be measured using the EQ-5D-5L instrument\[REF: The EuroQol Group (1990). EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199-208html \] (paper and telephone versions), with the results for each participant converted into quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) using the area under the curve approach, a standard methodology for this process,\[REF: Drummond MOB, B; Stoddart, G; Torrance, G. . Methods for the economic evaluation of Health Care Programmes: Oxford University Press 2005.\] with the responses to the EQ-5D-5L scored using the appropriate value set for the United Kingdom, which is expected to be available by the time of the analysis. REF: Office for Health Economics. New OHE Publications: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England. Available at: https://www.ohe.org/news/new-ohe-publications-eq-5d-5l-value-set-england. Accessed February 03 2017\]

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026