Skip to content

Wearable Sensor for Responsive DBS for ET

Wearable Sensor Driven Closed-loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03051178
Enrollment
17
Registered
2017-02-13
Start date
2018-09-18
Completion date
2021-09-29
Last updated
2024-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a possible new treatment for Essential Tremor (ET) using external wearable sensors, which have the capability of recording acceleration and Electromyography (EMG). This therapy is called Responsive Deep Brain Stimulation (R-DBS). R-DBS systems will communicate with a computer, and apply stimulation when the computer detects patterns associated with tremor. This detection will suppress pathological activity and improve or alleviate the tremor. Currently, DBS is approved for the treatment of ET; however, stimulation is delivered continuously even when tremor or other symptoms are absent. Continuous DBS can lead to unwanted side effects such as stuttering and gait\\balance problems. On the other hand, R-DBS will turn on only if activity associated with ET from the external sensors is detected.

Detailed description

The overall purpose of this application is to capture pathological activity related to essential tremor using external wearable sensors to responsively initiate or terminate DBS. To this end, the researchers propose to use the Nexus-D system, which requires a firm ware update to an Activa Implantable Neurostimulator (INS), and it will in a smart way turn DBS on/off in patients. The study team will recruit subjects with Activa SC or PC neurostimulator implants during 6 post-operative programming visits. The research group is already familiar with and is in possession of the Nexus-D system, and the investigators have successfully performed responsive DBS in two patients with Tourette syndrome (TS) and in four patients with Parkinson's disease in acute settings. The lab is also equipped with wireless wearable sensor and amplifier systems, such as a 16-unit wireless EMG+ acceleration+inertia Trigno Wireless Bio Acquisition System (Delsys Inc, Natick, MA). The study team aims to combine these signal modalities to capture pathological symptoms and generate commands to initiate or terminate DBS (also record adverse side effects, if any). The project goal is to characterize the clinical efficacy, side effect profile, and battery life of closed-loop DBS in acute settings using wearable sensors in essential tremor patients.

Interventions

DEVICEResponsive deep brain stimulation

Responsive deep brain stimulation (R-DBS) therapy will be delivered responsively based on the level of their symptoms as detected by wearable EMG and inertia (acceleration) sensors.

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
De Luca Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provide informed consent * Patient is over 21 years of age * Patient has had a significant disabling, medication-refractory upper extremity tremor with no evidence of non-ET central nervous system disease or injury for at least three (3) months prior to implantation of Activa SC, PC, or RC device. * Patient receives Vim electrode and Activa SC, PC or RC device implants, and recovers fully after surgery. * Patient is available for study participation after their clinical programming appointments for six months.

Exclusion criteria

* Medication related movement disorders. * Any suspicion of Parkinsonian tremor, including presence of Parkinsonian features such as bradykinesia, rigidity, or postural instability. * Severe medical co-morbidity including cardiovascular disorder, lung disorder, kidney disease, continuous neurological disease, hematological disease, or frailty that impact tolerability of the surgery as judged by the screening physicians. * Patient is undergoing a lead revision surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST)30 minutes during one monthly visit after clinical continuous deep brain stimulation is optimized.Responsive deep brain stimulation as an effective alternative to continuous deep brain stimulation. Clinical Tremor Rating Scale (TRS), rated by a blinded neurologist, during responsive brain stimulation will be compared to scores during continuous deep brain stimulation and no stimulation. The minimum and maximum score range for this scale is 0-80, with higher score indicating worse outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

17 patients were enrolled into the single arm study. 5 patients withdrew from the study. We are comparing their clinical Tremor Rating Scores (TRS) for three conditions: deep brain stimulation (DBS) OFF, standard (continuous) DBS, and responsive DBS (the trial condition).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjects With Essential Tremor
This cohort will receive deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy responsively based on the level of their symptoms as detected by wearable EMG and inertia (acceleration) sensors. Responsive deep brain stimulation: Responsive deep brain stimulation (R-DBS) therapy will be delivered responsively based on the level of their symptoms as detected by wearable EMG and inertia (acceleration) sensors. The clinical tremor rating scale (TRS) with R-DBS will be compare to no DBS and continuous DBS TRS scores.
17
Total17

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubjects With Essential Tremor
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Age, Continuous74.2 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST)

Responsive deep brain stimulation as an effective alternative to continuous deep brain stimulation. Clinical Tremor Rating Scale (TRS), rated by a blinded neurologist, during responsive brain stimulation will be compared to scores during continuous deep brain stimulation and no stimulation. The minimum and maximum score range for this scale is 0-80, with higher score indicating worse outcome.

Time frame: 30 minutes during one monthly visit after clinical continuous deep brain stimulation is optimized.

Population: We statistically compared the Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) scores for responsive deep brain stimulation (R-DBS) to standard continuous DBS (cDBS) and to NO DBS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects With Essential TremorClinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST)DBS Off18.39534884 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.191454455
Subjects With Essential TremorClinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST)Continuous DBS13.97674419 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.616677429
Subjects With Essential TremorClinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST)Responsive DBS14.58139535 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.197217929
Comparison: TRS scores measured across different stimulation conditions were assessed using a mixed model ANOVA with the participant as a random effect. All post-hoc comparisons were Bonferroni corrected.p-value: <0.01ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026