Skip to content

Custom Pack in Spine Surgery

Surgical Field Custom Pack's Efficacy on Soft Tissue Dissecting Time Reduction, on Relative Risks and Materials Wasted, in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03050203
Acronym
kit
Enrollment
37
Registered
2017-02-10
Start date
2015-09-02
Completion date
2016-07-30
Last updated
2019-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Diseases, Spine Cancer, Spine Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Recent evidence suggests the efficacy of custom pack procedure on the operators reduction time and on the contamination risk due to the opening of many sterile packs. Nevertheless ,the studies available are sponsored by the industry and their results are very few. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation and reliability of spine surgery custom pack efficacy in adult patients obtained in the reduction of surgery time, relative risks, and materials wasted compared with the standard surgical field procedure practice .

Interventions

OTHERcustom pack

Preparation of the surgical field using a custom pack. The use of a custom pack provides much of the material provided for the preparation of the surgical field with a single opening of the package , reducing the risk of contamination of the material.

OTHERstandard care

The scrub nurse prepares the surgical field opening all the sterile packs it deems necessary for the surgery

Sponsors

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Degenerative spinal disease from 2 to 4 levels, * Oncologic spine disease with only decompression and stabilization.

Exclusion criteria

* Revision surgeries, * Minimally invasive interventions, * Interventions that provide a dual access, and * Patients who refuse consent to experimentation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Soft Tissue Dissecting Timeup to the first day post interventionminutes from the start of the dissection to complete bone cleaning

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Complicationsup to 2 weeksnumber of early wound infection
Numbers of Materials Wastedup to the first day post interventionamount of open sterile materials not used
Surgery Timeup to the first day post interventionfrom the incision to the patient's sutures (minutes)
Pain (Score on the Numeric Rating Scale)up to the first 3 days post interventionPain Score on the Numeric Rating Scale. The scale had values from 0 to 10 where zero represented no pain and 10 the worst possible pain.
Length of Stayup to 2 weeksnumber of days spent in hospital
Blood Lossup to 2 weeksLevels of hemoglobin and hematocrit intraoperative (gas analysis before and after surgery) compared to hemoglobin and hematocrit before surgery and number of blood transfusions both intra- and postoperative.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Custom Pack
custom pack: Preparation of the surgical field using a custom pack. The use of a custom pack provides much of the material provided for the preparation of the surgical field with a single opening of the package , reducing the risk of contamination of the material.
19
Standard Care
standard care: The scrub nurse prepares the surgical field opening all the sterile packs it deems necessary for the surgery
18
Total37

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCustom PackStandard CareTotal
Age, Continuous51.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
degenerative disease5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants8 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants10 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Soft Tissue Dissecting Time

minutes from the start of the dissection to complete bone cleaning

Time frame: up to the first day post intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Custom PackSoft Tissue Dissecting Time38.6 minuesStandard Deviation 11.1
Standard CareSoft Tissue Dissecting Time34 minuesStandard Deviation 19.5
Secondary

Blood Loss

Levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit intraoperative (gas analysis before and after surgery) compared to hemoglobin and hematocrit before surgery and number of blood transfusions both intra- and postoperative.

Time frame: up to 2 weeks

Secondary

Length of Stay

number of days spent in hospital

Time frame: up to 2 weeks

Secondary

Numbers of Materials Wasted

amount of open sterile materials not used

Time frame: up to the first day post intervention

Secondary

Pain (Score on the Numeric Rating Scale)

Pain Score on the Numeric Rating Scale. The scale had values from 0 to 10 where zero represented no pain and 10 the worst possible pain.

Time frame: up to the first 3 days post intervention

Secondary

Postoperative Complications

number of early wound infection

Time frame: up to 2 weeks

Secondary

Surgery Time

from the incision to the patient's sutures (minutes)

Time frame: up to the first day post intervention

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026