Skip to content

Caring for the Caregiver Network

A Tailored Technology Intervention for Diverse Caregivers of AD Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03049501
Enrollment
244
Registered
2017-02-10
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2018-04-20
Last updated
2019-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caregivers of Alzheimer's Disease or Memory Problem Patients

Keywords

Alzheimer's caregivers, Technology-based intervention, Culturally-tailored intervention

Brief summary

The prevalence of family caregivers is projected to increase in concert with the projected increase in number of AD patients. The focus of the study is to gather systematic data on the acceptability and efficacy of a unique technology-based, culturally- tailored psycho-social intervention program that targets ethnically/culturally diverse family caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The overall goal of the project is to improve the lives of family caregivers as well as their ability to provide care to their loved one and to reduce disparities in access to needed services and support among caregiver populations.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCaregiving condition

The intervention will consist of multimedia features accessible via the study-provided tablet. The components include: skill-building sessions and modules; a resource guide; an annotated reading list; information and tips; expert educational seminars (video); and structured support group sessions (6 sessions). All the sessions (home-based, one-on-one, and support group sessions) will last about 60-90 minutes.

The intervention will provide resource and information tips on topics related to Nutrition for a total of 8 sessions. The first and last session will be home-based and all the other sessions will be conducted via web-conferencing using the tablet provided.

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Speak and understand English or Spanish 2. Provide care to a loved one with memory decline 3. Not having terminal illness/condition 4. 18+ yrs old

Exclusion criteria

1. Not providing care to a loved one with Alzheimer disease or dementia 2. Not speak English or Spanish 3. Have cognitive deficit 4. Have terminal illness 5. Plan to place their loved one in a facility 6. Plan to move away in the next 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression as Measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)Baseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-upCES-D Scale ranges from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater frequency of depressive symptoms.
Caregiving Burden as Measured by Burden InventoryBaseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-upHigher score means greater level of caregiver burden. Range (0-44)
Caregiver's Self Report of Self-careBaseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-upA 13 Item self care questionnaire is used to measure caregivers self care. Each item can be scored as 0,1,negative 3 or negative 4. The total score ranging from negative 52 to 13. Higher score means better in keeping medical obligations to him/herself.
Caregiver's Self-report of Physical HealthBaseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-upSF 12 Health Survey was used to measure physical health of the caregiver. Scores ranges from 0 to 35 with lower score means less limitation to physical health.
Caregiver's Self-efficacyBaseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-upA 15 item Caregiver's self efficacy questionnaire will be used to assess caregiver's self-efficacy. The questionnaire score ranges from 0-1500 percent with a lower percentage score indicating less efficacy.
Positive Aspects of CaregivingBaseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-upAn 11 item positive aspects of caregiving questionnaire was used to measure positive aspects of caregiving. Each item can be scored 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, negative 3 or negative 4. The total score ranging from negative 44 to 44. Higher score means more positive feelings towards caregiving.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Caregiving Condition
Participants will receive a computer tablet and have access to web-based skill building sessions, videos from experts, annotated resources and information and tips on caregiving-related topics Caregiving condition
123
Nutrition Condition
Participants will receive a computer tablet and have access to web-based training sessions on different topics related to nutrition Nutrition condition
121
Total244

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalNutrition ConditionCaregiving Condition
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
94 Participants39 Participants55 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
150 Participants82 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
109 Participants54 Participants55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
135 Participants67 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
55 Participants26 Participants29 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
174 Participants89 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
204 Participants101 Participants103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants20 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Caregiver's Self-efficacy

A 15 item Caregiver's self efficacy questionnaire will be used to assess caregiver's self-efficacy. The questionnaire score ranges from 0-1500 percent with a lower percentage score indicating less efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-up

Population: Follow up visits were not completed for all participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Caregiving ConditionCaregiver's Self-efficacyBaseline925.21 percentage of efficacyStandard Deviation 243.36
Caregiving ConditionCaregiver's Self-efficacy6 month follow up971.43 percentage of efficacyStandard Deviation 295.41
Caregiving ConditionCaregiver's Self-efficacy12 month follow up999.65 percentage of efficacyStandard Deviation 285.94
Nutrition ConditionCaregiver's Self-efficacy12 month follow up1047.71 percentage of efficacyStandard Deviation 225.14
Nutrition ConditionCaregiver's Self-efficacyBaseline936.65 percentage of efficacyStandard Deviation 249.62
Nutrition ConditionCaregiver's Self-efficacy6 month follow up964.15 percentage of efficacyStandard Deviation 273.06
Primary

Caregiver's Self-report of Physical Health

SF 12 Health Survey was used to measure physical health of the caregiver. Scores ranges from 0 to 35 with lower score means less limitation to physical health.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-up

Population: Follow up visits were not completed for all participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Caregiving ConditionCaregiver's Self-report of Physical HealthBaseline2.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Caregiving ConditionCaregiver's Self-report of Physical Health6 month follow up2.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Caregiving ConditionCaregiver's Self-report of Physical Health12 month follow up2.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Nutrition ConditionCaregiver's Self-report of Physical HealthBaseline2.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Nutrition ConditionCaregiver's Self-report of Physical Health6 month follow up2.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Nutrition ConditionCaregiver's Self-report of Physical Health12 month follow up2.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Primary

Caregiver's Self Report of Self-care

A 13 Item self care questionnaire is used to measure caregivers self care. Each item can be scored as 0,1,negative 3 or negative 4. The total score ranging from negative 52 to 13. Higher score means better in keeping medical obligations to him/herself.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-up

Population: Follow up visits were not completed for all participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Caregiving ConditionCaregiver's Self Report of Self-careBaseline0.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Caregiving ConditionCaregiver's Self Report of Self-care6 month follow up0.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Caregiving ConditionCaregiver's Self Report of Self-care12 month follow up0.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Nutrition ConditionCaregiver's Self Report of Self-careBaseline0.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Nutrition ConditionCaregiver's Self Report of Self-care6 month follow up0.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Nutrition ConditionCaregiver's Self Report of Self-care12 month follow up0.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Primary

Caregiving Burden as Measured by Burden Inventory

Higher score means greater level of caregiver burden. Range (0-44)

Time frame: Baseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-up

Population: Follow up visits were not completed for all participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Caregiving ConditionCaregiving Burden as Measured by Burden InventoryBaseline18.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.91
Caregiving ConditionCaregiving Burden as Measured by Burden Inventory6 month follow up16.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.39
Caregiving ConditionCaregiving Burden as Measured by Burden Inventory12 month follow up16.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.29
Nutrition ConditionCaregiving Burden as Measured by Burden InventoryBaseline19.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.59
Nutrition ConditionCaregiving Burden as Measured by Burden Inventory6 month follow up18.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.97
Nutrition ConditionCaregiving Burden as Measured by Burden Inventory12 month follow up17.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.27
Primary

Depression as Measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

CES-D Scale ranges from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater frequency of depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-up

Population: Follow up visits were not completed for all participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Caregiving ConditionDepression as Measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)Baseline11.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.02
Caregiving ConditionDepression as Measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)6 month follow up10.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.63
Caregiving ConditionDepression as Measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)12 month follow up10.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.18
Nutrition ConditionDepression as Measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)Baseline10.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.79
Nutrition ConditionDepression as Measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)6 month follow up10.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.23
Nutrition ConditionDepression as Measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)12 month follow up10.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.25
Primary

Positive Aspects of Caregiving

An 11 item positive aspects of caregiving questionnaire was used to measure positive aspects of caregiving. Each item can be scored 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, negative 3 or negative 4. The total score ranging from negative 44 to 44. Higher score means more positive feelings towards caregiving.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-mth follow-up and 12-mth follow-up

Population: Follow up visits were not completed for all participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Caregiving ConditionPositive Aspects of CaregivingBaseline24.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.49
Caregiving ConditionPositive Aspects of Caregiving6 month follow up24.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.34
Caregiving ConditionPositive Aspects of Caregiving12 month follow up24.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Nutrition ConditionPositive Aspects of CaregivingBaseline23.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.83
Nutrition ConditionPositive Aspects of Caregiving6 month follow up24.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.54
Nutrition ConditionPositive Aspects of Caregiving12 month follow up24.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.54

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026