Skip to content

Goal Management Training for Patients With Schizophrenia or High Risk for Schizophrenia

Cognitive Remediation of Executive Dysfunction - Goal Management Training for Patients With Schizophrenia or High Risk for Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03048695
Enrollment
83
Registered
2017-02-09
Start date
2017-05-18
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurocognitive Disorders, Schizophrenia

Brief summary

About 85% of patients with schizophrenia have cognitive impairments, executive functions being particularly affected. Executive dysfunction, and cognitive deficits in general, are important predictors of functional outcomes, including social problem solving, activities of daily living, life satisfaction, and the ability to return to work or school.The main objective of the current study is to examine the efficacy of group-based Goal Management Training (GMT) for patients with broad schizophrenia spectrum disorders or high risk individuals with executive deficits. The short term goals are to investigate whether GMT can improve participants' ability to organize and achieve goals in everyday life in addition to improving aspects of emotional health. A long-term goal would be to establish an evidence base for nonpharmacological interventions for patients with broad schizophrenia spectrum disorders or high risk for schizophrenia. Main research questions: (1) Does a RCT with GMT delivered to patients with broad schizophrenia spectrum disorders or high risk for schizophrenia result in improved executive functioning, measured by self-reported and/or objective measures of executive functions? (2) Does GMT result in improved goal attainment in everyday life, social- and real world functioning? (3) Does GMT have a positive impact on the patients' emotional health? (4) Are there specific characteristics in patients with broad schizophrenia spectrum disorders or high risk for schizophrenia that are associated with better treatment benefit from GMT?

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGMT

Metacognitive strategy training where the primary objective is to stop ongoing behavior to define goal hierarchies and monitor performance

Sponsors

University of Oslo
CollaboratorOTHER
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 67 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being consecutively referred to treatment for a DSM-IV diagnosis of broad schizophrenia spectrum psychosis (schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder and schizoaffective disorder) or high risk for psychosis or being treated for psychotic disorder for less than 5 years. * Reporting executive problems through (a) structured interview, or (b) self-report, i.e. BRIEF scale T-score \< 55.

Exclusion criteria

* Reported ongoing alcohol or substance abuse. * Premorbid neurological disease or insult and/or comorbid neurological disease. ° Severe cognitive problems interfering with the capacity to participate. * IQ below 70.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Behavior Rating Inventory for Executive FunctionsBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Conners Continuous Performance Test IIIBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Positive and Negative Syndrome ScaleBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Digit span and Letter-number sequencingBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Iowa Gambling TaskBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Dysexecutive Questionnaire (self-and informant)Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Cognitive Failures QuestionnaireBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Goal Attainment ScalingBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Global Assessment of Functioning-Split VersionBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
General Perceived Self-Efficacy ScaleBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Social Functioning ScaleBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
The Perceived Quality of Life ScaleBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Rosenberg self-esteem scaleBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Hopkins Symptom Checklist 10Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Everyday Functioning from NORMENT Long time follow up questionnairesBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
The Hotel TaskBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change
Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) subtestsBaseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-upAssessing change

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026