Skip to content

HAIC Versus TACE for Large and Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B

The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Compared With Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Large and Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03048123
Enrollment
79
Registered
2017-02-09
Start date
2015-10-01
Completion date
2017-01-24
Last updated
2017-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Transarterial Chemoembolization, Large and unresectable HCC

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with large and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B.

Detailed description

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely used palliative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. While a number of studies demonstrate poor effect of TACE for patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B. Our previous prospective study also revealed similar results of large HCC patients treated with TACE. Recently, the results of our preliminary pilot study suggested that, compared with TACE, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may improve tumor response for HCC with large HCC. Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective nonrandomized control to demonstrate the superiority of HAIC over TACE.

Interventions

A standard hepatic artery catheter was introduced via the femoral artery percutaneously. Selective catheterization of the proper hepatic artery was performed using standard diagnostic catheters and fluoroscopic guidance. In the event of multiple arterial supply(including superior-mesenteric artery), the proportion of the liver supplied by each artery was estimated by the arteriogram. After optimal positioning of the catheter in dominant supplying artery to ensure minimal reflux, the catheter was fixed and connected with infusion tube. In the condition of multiple tumors on both left and right lobe, the gastroduodenal artery was embolized and the catheter was positioned in the hepatic proper artery for infusion. Folfox Protocol were infused through the fixed catheter sequentially

PROCEDURETransarterial chemoembolization

Previous procedure was same with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. After optimal positioning of the catheter, TACE Drug Protocol were injected.

oxaliplatin,leucovorin and 5-FU

lipiodol mixed with chemotherapy drugs(EADM , lobaplatin, and MMC) followed by polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA)

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age range from 18-75 years; * KPS≥70; * The diagnosis of HCC was based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), simultaneously staged as BCLC A or BCLC B based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. * Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured; * Solitary tumor with diameter ≥10cm, invaded both left and right lobe; or multiple tumors, diameter of the largest was more than 7cm. * Diagnosed as unresectable with consensus by the panel of liver surgery experts; * Re commanded treated by TAI or TACE with consensus by the panel of liver MDT; * No past history of TACE, TAI, chemotherapy or molecule-targeted treatment; * No Cirrhosis or cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only * No liver protection therapy in 2 weeks before enrolled, and meet the following laboratory parameters:(a) Platelet count ≥ 75,000/μL; (b)Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL;(c) Total bilirubin ≤ 30mmol/L;(d) Serum albumin ≥ 32 g/L;(e) ASL and AST ≤ 6 x upper limit of normal;(f) Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal;(g) INR \> 2.3 or PT/APTT within normal limits; (h) Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1,500/mm3; * Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry. * Known of serious heart disease which can nor endure the treatment such as cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy * Evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy * Known history of HIV * History of organ allograft * Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial. * Evidence of bleeding diathesis. * Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event \> CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug * Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture * Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease * Poor compliance that can not comply with the course of treatment and follow up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease control rate16 monthsBest response based on RECIST

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to progression16 months
Adverse Events30 Days after HAIC and TACEPostoperative adverse events were graded based on CTCAE v4.03

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026