Skip to content

Metal Ion Concentration Between Coated and Uncoated TKA

Metal Ion Concentration and Clinical Outcome Between Coated and Uncoated TKA

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03047564
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-02-09
Start date
2012-02-01
Completion date
2020-12-01
Last updated
2025-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Total Knee Arthroplasty, Total Knee Replacement, Outcome, Metal ion concentration, Results

Brief summary

Metal ion release from metal implants may have side effects. It can be reduced by coating of the implant. This study compares coated and uncoated TKA.

Detailed description

Patients are randomized to receive a coated or uncoated TKA. Patients are assessed before surgery, after 3 month, 1 year and 5 years. Blood samples are collected in 7.5 ml S-Monovette® tubes (for trace metal analysis, Sarstedt AG, Germany) using a specific steel needle for trace metal analysis (Sarstedt AG, Germany). Within one hour, plasma was separated by centrifugation at 2500g for ten minutes. Samples were stored at -20°C before being analysed for chromium, cobalt, molybdenum and nickel content using a graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometer Z-8270 with Polarisation-Zeeman-Absorption (Hitachi Ltd., Japan). The accuracy and precision of the method is validated to \< 10% using the control materials SeronormTM Trace Elements Serum (SERO AS, Norway). The detection limit of the method is estimated at 0.5µg/l for chromium, cobalt and molybdenum, 1.0µg/l for nickel (mean + 3 standard deviations from buffer). All probes having ion levels below the detection limit were adjusted to 0.25µg/l for chromium, cobalt and molybdenum and 0.5µg/l for nickel. Clinical outcome is measured with the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, Short-Form 36 and University of Los Angeles Activity Score.

Interventions

Implantation of a coated Total Knee Arthroplasty

Implantation of a Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty

Sponsors

Mathys Ltd Bettlach
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Technische Universität Dresden
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No masking

Intervention model description

Randomization to one of two implants

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* indication to TKA * no other metal implant

Exclusion criteria

* no informed consent * not able to understand study and/or questionnaires * Need of a higher constrained implant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Metal Ions (Cobalt, Chromium, Molydenum, Nickel)before surgery, 1 year, 5 yearsChange in Serum Metal Ion concentrations 1 and 5 years after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functionbefore surgery, 3 month, 1 year, 5 yearsKnee Society Score
Patient Reported Outcomebefore surgery, 3 month, 1 year, 5 yearsOxford Knee Score
Health-related Quality of Lifebefore surgery, 3 month, 1 year, 5 yearsSF 36
Activitybefore surgery, 3 month, 1 year, 5 yearsUCLA activity score

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Eventsthrough study completion, in average 5 yearsAdverse Events

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026