Skip to content

Immediate Post-operative Recovery After Regional vs. General Anesthesia

Immediate Post-operative Outcome After Regional vs. General Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03047148
Enrollment
1880
Registered
2017-02-08
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2018-05-01
Last updated
2018-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Outcome

Brief summary

Early post-anesthesia status of patients emerging from surgery encompasses vital respiratory and hemodynamic parameters as well as subjective signs of well-being such as absence of nausea, vomiting and a low pain level. This investigation intends to compare the rate of postoperative complications in the 2 groups from pair matched patient records after regional anesthesia with otherwise similar patients after general anesthesia.

Detailed description

It is still unclear whether the immediate post-operative condition of patients after surgery and anesthesia is dependent on the basic anesthesia technique (General vs. regional anesthesia). The patients' post-anesthesia presentation encompasses vital respiratory and hemodynamic parameters as well as subjective signs of well-being such as absence of nausea, vomiting and a low pain level. By pair matching of patient records after regional anesthesia with otherwise similar patients after general anesthesia (control group), the rate of postoperative complications in the 2 groups will be compared. The results of this investigation will help to answer what is the difference in complication rates and wellbeing of patients depending on their previous anesthesia. The results of this study will Show which basic anesthesia technique has more or less early complications.

Interventions

OTHERData mining from records

The relevant data for this investigation is extracted from the patient records database as well as from the assessment results of the ongoing quality control process that were collected by the nursing staff of the postoperative recovery units.

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Records from regional anesthesia cases on adults which have quality control assessment data, plus the same number of matched pairs who had general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* Cases with incomplete quality control assessment data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative complications during inhospital stay up to 30 days1 March to 30 November 2017Number participants who had one or more cardiovascular events up to discharge or 30 days
Postoperative complications during inhospital stay up to 30 days (PONV) - Duration of pain (VAS > 3) episodes in hours; days up to discharge or max. 30 days1 March to 30 November 2017Number of PONV episodes up to discharge or max. 30 days Duration of PONV episodes in days; hours up to discharge or max. 30 days
Postoperative complications during inhospital stay up to 30 days (pain)1 March to 30 November 2017Duration of pain (VAS \> 3) episodes in hours; days up to discharge or max. 30 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of hospital stay1 March to 30 November 2017Length of hospital stay in days up to discharge or max. 30 days
Postoperative mortality1 March to 30 November 2017In-patient postoperative mortality (yes or no up to 30 days)
Total in-hospital costs1 March to 30 November 2017Absolute amount per case in CHF according financial department report

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026