Skip to content

Treatment Patterns and Key Healthcare Resource Use in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With or Without FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase-3 (FLT3) Mutation Study Based on Retrospective Chart Review

Treatment Patterns and Key Healthcare Resource Use in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With and Without FLT3 Mutation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03047083
Enrollment
1027
Registered
2017-02-08
Start date
2014-06-02
Completion date
2016-03-18
Last updated
2024-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Keywords

Retrospective, Non-interventional Study, FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) mutations

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the treatment patterns and AML-related key healthcare resource use among AML patients, stratified by FLT3 mutation status, intensive chemotherapy (IC) eligibility, and relapsed or refractory (R/R) status.

Detailed description

The current study is a retrospective non-interventional study using real-world data collected from existing medical records to evaluate descriptively the treatment patterns and key healthcare resource use among AML patients with or without FLT3 mutation. The current study relies on secondary use of existing data, and there is no intervention involved. Patients who received the first AML treatment after the initial diagnosis, or were classified as relapsed/refractory (R/R), between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015 will be randomly selected to be included in this study, and the data from their existing medical records will be extracted. Eligible patients will be grouped based on FLT3 mutation status, intensive chemotherapy (IC) eligibility, and R/R status. For newly diagnosed patients, the index date will be defined as the initiation date of the first AML treatment following initial diagnosis. For the R/R patients, the index date will be defined as the date of the patient being classified as R/R. The study period will be the period from the index date to last follow-up date or death, whichever comes earlier. The endpoint measurements of this study are treatment patterns and key AML-related healthcare resources used during the study period.

Interventions

OTHERTreatment patterns among AML patients

This is a retrospective cohort study of AML patients with or without FLT3 mutation who were exposed to treatments for AML per treating physician's decision between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015.

OTHERAML-related healthcare resources

This is a retrospective cohort study of AML patients with or without FLT3 mutation who were exposed to treatments for AML per treating physician's decision between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015.

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of AML but NOT acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) * Known FLT3 mutation status * Under the care of the participating physician during the past 3 years OR from the initial diagnosis of AML * The medical records related to AML for the patient are available to the physician and can be abstracted for this study * The medical records contains complete information on treatments and AML-related hospitalization, including admission date, length of stay, and reason of hospitalization * Initiation date of first treatment after AML diagnosis OR date of being classified as relapsed from or being refractory to initial treatment (R/R) is between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015

Exclusion criteria

* Not applicable

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment patterns assessed by drugs initiatedUp to 3 years
Treatment patterns assessed by dosageUp to 3 years
Treatment patterns assessed by duration of treatmentUp to 3 years
Treatment patterns assessed by whether remission was achieved.Up to 3 years
Treatment patterns assessed by an eventUp to 3 yearsReported death, failure of treatment or relapse of any type
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by number of hospitalizations and lengths of ICU hospital stayUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by number of emergency department (ED) visitsUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by number of outpatient visitsUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by number of blood transfusionsUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by number of infections and associated treatmentsUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by number of lab testsUp to 3 yearsLab tests include bone marrow biopsy
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by number of relevant concomitant medicationsUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by number of diagnostic proceduresUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by use of mechanical ventilationUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by use of parenteral feedingUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by length of hospice careUp to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by number of hospitalizations (ICU and non-ICU)Up to 3 years
AML-related healthcare resource use assessed by lengths of hospital stay (ICU and non-ICU)Up to 3 years

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026