Skip to content

Baska ® Mask Versus Endotracheal Tube in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Baska ® Mask Versus Endotracheal Tube in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : A Prospective Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03045835
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-02-08
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2020-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Surgery

Keywords

laparoscopic cholecystectomy BASKA mask Endotracheal tube

Brief summary

Baska mask is a new novel supraglottic airway device with many salient features. The investigators aim to determine the benefit of BASKA mask as an effective airway device for laparoscopic surgery, and whether it can even substitute endotracheal intubation, in order to smoothen the surgery and anaesthesia process as well as reduce perioperative complications.

Detailed description

Patient's satisfaction and smooth process is crucial for perioperative care.Conduct of Anaesthesia including choice of airway devices play an important role. Endotracheal intubation has long been regarded as the technique of choice for airway management in laparoscopic surgery. However, there is currently an emerging interest in laryngeal mask as the substitute for endotracheal tube in laparoscopic surgery. The increased abdominal pressure secondary to gas insufflation in Laparoscopic surgery demands a good supraglottic airway device with features of good seal, aspiration prevention and effective ventilation. Few studies have evaluated the performance Baska® Mask for various type of surgery and had obtained high first-attempt success rate, easy insertion and a good oropharyngeal leak pressure above 30cmH2O with low complications such as sorethroat, dysphonia and dysphagia. However, study regarding comparison of Baska® mask with endotracheal tube has not been carried out before. Therefore, the investigators would like to evaluate this novel device in comparison with endotracheal tube for laparoscopic surgery in our centre. This will be a prospective randomized controlled study in University Malaya Medical Centre to compare Baska® mask with the conventional laryngoscope-guided endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic surgeries. The investigators would like to study the efficacy of this device in term of : time to effective airway insertion, efficacy of airway seal, post-operation device of complications.

Interventions

Baska mask will be inserted during induction of anaesthesia and once patient is in an adequate anaesthetic depth

DEVICEEndotracheal intubation

Endotracheal intubation will be carried out during induction of anaesthesia and once patient is in an adequate anaesthetic depth

Sponsors

University of Malaya
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 to 75 years old * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II BMI ≤ 35 * Laparoscopic cholecystectomy only

Exclusion criteria

* Known gastroesophageal reflux * History of difficult intubation or difficult anaesthesia * Features of facial, laryngeal and pharyngeal anatomy problem

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to effective airway insertion1 hourdefined as time from picking up the airway device (either BASKA mask or Endotracheal tube), insertion and until occurrence of the first square-waveform capnogram

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numbers of attempt of airway device insertion and Ease of insertion1 hourdefined as: 1 - first attempt easy, smooth insertion; 2 - second attempt, insertion with resistance; 3 - three attempts, insertion with difficulty; 4 -failed insertion of the SGAs and need to crossover to ETT group
Gastric distension scoring by surgeonduring operative durationon a visual analogue scale 0-10 (Figure 2), where 0 = empty stomach, and 10 = heavy distension that interfered with surgical exposure at a) entry of the laparoscope following peritoneal insufflation and b) immediately before removal of the laparoscope at the end of the surgical procedure
Post operation incidence of complicationsfrom the induction of anaesthesia, until at the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU), assessed up to 24 hourspatients are assessed for the incidence of sore throat, airway trauma (lip, tongue, teeth, blood-staining on device), nausea, vomiting, airway spasm, aspiration, emergence cough
Hemodynamic changesafter induction of anaesthesia at 1, 2, 3,4,5,10,20,30 minutes; then post extubation at 1 ,2,3,4,5 minutesBlood pressure and Heart rate

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPL) of the device during operationduring operative durationthe above pressure is measured by performing the maneuver: the expiratory valve of the anaesthetic machine is closed and with a fixed gas flow of 3 L/min, the airway pressure at which equilibrium is reached is recorded. Maximal allowable airway pressure is 40 cm H2O \[ OLP is measured at following timeframe - T1: immediately post intubation; T2 : before CO2 insufflation; T3 : after CO2 insufflation; T4 and beyond : each change of position as required during operation (eg. Trendelenburg, reverse Trendelenburg, left tilt)
peak airway pressure of the device during operationduring operative durationthe above pressure is recorded from the anaesthetic machine at following timeframe - T1: immediately post intubation; T2 : before CO2 insufflation; T3 : after CO2 insufflation; T4 and beyond : each change of position as required during operation (eg. Trendelenburg, reverse Trendelenburg, left tilt)

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026