Horticultural Therapy, Dementia
Conditions
Keywords
Horticultural Therapy, Dementia, Randomized Controlled Trial, Elderly, Prevention
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to determine whether horticultural therapy would improve the psychological well-being older adults who are at risk of memory (cognitive) decline. 100 elderly subjects who are at risk of cognitive decline will be randomized into the active horticultural therapy or to the waitlist control group. Sessions will be conducted weekly for 9 months, and participants will be assessed at 3 time-points: at the start of the study, at 3 months and at 9 months. It is hypothesized that participants who undergo horticultural therapy will perform better on neuropsychological tests when compared to control, and that they will have improved psychological well-being and functional outcomes.
Detailed description
Study participants comprise of community-dwelling elderly who are at risk of developing dementia, and will be selected from consenting participants from an existing community cognitive screening program. This is an intervention study where 100 subjects will be randomized into an active horticultural therapy group, or a waitlist control group. Baseline demographic data will be collected at the start of the study. Assessments will be done at the start, at 3 months and at 6 months, which will include neuropsychological tests of cognitive functioning, psychological tests for depression and anxiety, assessment of psychosocial well-being, and tests of functional status. The Horticultural Therapy intervention will be delivered by trained facilitators at the Therapeutic Garden at Hort Park, and consists of 1 hour sessions weekly for 9 months. The Horticultural Therapy program is designed to stimulate the senses through interaction with the tasks and the environment, promote social interaction and also to promote a sense of self-worth through completion of projects. It encompasses a range of activities including general gardening and also project-based craft activities. The control group will be placed on a waiting list and only be contacted for assessments. They will receive intervention after the active treatment group at a later date.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALHorticultural Therapy
The Horticultural Therapy intervention will be delivered by trained facilitators at the Therapeutic Garden at Hort Park, and consists of 1 hour sessions weekly for 9 months. The Horticultural Therapy program is designed to stimulate the senses through interaction with the tasks and the environment, promote social interaction and also to promote a sense of self-worth through completion of projects. It encompasses a range of activities including general gardening and also project-based craft activities.
Sponsors
National Parks Board, Singapore
Ministry of Health, Singapore
Ministry of National Development, Singapore
National University Hospital, Singapore
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1\. Community-living elderly aged 60 years and above, AND 2. 1. Mild Cognitive Impairment based on clinical history and neuropsychological test scores (Z score \<0 and \>-1.5), OR 2. Subjective Memory Impairment based on self-report, OR (C) 2 or more risk factors for dementia such as family history, cerebrovascular disease, and cardiovascular risk factors
Exclusion criteria
1. Existing diagnosis of dementia, OR 2. Comorbid major mental illness (such as Major Depressive Disorder and Psychosis), OR 3. Severe or unstable life-limiting medical illness, OR 4. Severe physical impairment precluding participation in Horticultural Therapy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) at baseline and at 9 months | Baseline, 9 months | Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR ) is a 5-point scale used to characterize six domains of cognitive and functional performance applicable to Alzheimer disease and related dementias: Memory, Orientation, Judgment & Problem Solving, Community Affairs, Home & Hobbies, and Personal Care. |
| Changes in Colour Trails Tests (CTT) scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | Colour Trails Tests (CTT) 1 and 2 assesses sustained attention and sequencing. |
| Changes in Digit Span Task scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | Digit Span Task, which consists of a Digit Span Forward (DSF) and a Digit Span Backward (DSB) task is used to assess attention and verbal working memory. |
| Changes in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) evaluates declarative verbal learning and memory. |
| Changes in Block Design scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | Block Design is a subtest that is administered as part of several of the Wechsler Intelligence tests, and it primarily measures visual-spatial and organizational processing abilities, as well as non-verbal problem-solving skills |
| Changes in Semantic Verbal Fluency scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | Semantic Verbal Fluency assess lexical knowledge and semantic memory organization. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | The IADL Scale is used to assess more complex activities of daily living necessary for functioning in community living, such as handling finances and food preparation. It consists of 8 items which are summarily scored from zero (low functioning) to 8 (high functioning) |
| Changes in Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | The SDS (Zung, 1965) is a 20-item quantitative measurement of symptoms of depression. Participants rate each item regarding how they felt during the week preceding using a 4-point scale that ranges from 1 (a little of the time) to 4 (most of the time). A total raw score computed by summing the scores on the individual items will be converted into a percentage (the SDS index); the higher the SDS index, the greater the severity of depressive symptoms. Several studies have established the SDS as a reliable and valid instrument for measuring depressive symptoms (Biggs et al., 1978; Gabrys and Peters, 1985; Agrell and Dehlin, 1989). |
| Changes in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | The PSQI is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality, and consists of 19 individual items, creating 7 components that produce one global score, and takes 5-10 minutes to complete. |
| Changes in Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | The SAS (Zung, 1971) will be used to measure anxiety of the participants in the preceding week. It is a 20-item self-report assessment designed to measure anxiety levels, based on cognitive, autonomic, motor and central nervous system symptoms. Each question is scored on a Likert-type scale of 1-4 (a little of the time) to (most of the time). Some questions are negatively worded to avoid the problem of set response. Overall assessment is done by total score. The total raw scores range from 20-80. The raw score then needs to be converted to an Anxiety Index score; the higher the SAS index, the greater the severity of depressive symptoms. |
| Changes in Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-being scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | The Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being (Ryff and Singer, 1998) is an 18-item questionnaire which reflects the six areas of psychological well-being: autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, positive relations with others, purpose in life, and self-acceptance. Respondents rate statements on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 indicating strong disagreement and 6 indicating strong agreement. |
| Changes in Friendship Scale (FS) scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | Social connectedness scale will be measured using the Friendship Scale (Hawthorne, 2006). It is a 6-item questionnaire that measures both social isolation and social connectedness. Participants were asked to rate the frequency in which each statement describes them during the past four weeks on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (almost always) to 5 (not at all). Total scores were computed by summing the scores on the individual items and ranged from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher level of social connectedness. The Friendship Scale was developed as a short, user-friendly, stand alone scale measuring perceived social isolation. It was validated with older adults with excellent internal structures, reliability and validity (Hawthorne, 2006; Hawthorne, 2008). |
| Changes in EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionaire (ED-5D-3L) scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | The E5-5D-3L is a standardized instrument for measuring general health status, which consists of 5 questions and a visual analog scale - which is a self-rating scale ranging from zero (0) to one hundred (100) to indicate the perceived health state from worst to best respectively. |
| Changes in the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores at baseline, 3 months and 9 months | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months | The MBI is an instrument used to assess the performance in Activities of Daily Living, and consists of 10 variables that reflect activities of daily living and mobility used to monitor functional status. |
Countries
Singapore
Outcome results
None listed