Skip to content

Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-FFR Compared to Invasive Coronar Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Compared to Invasive Coronar Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03045601
Enrollment
182
Registered
2017-02-07
Start date
2017-02-21
Completion date
2021-03-01
Last updated
2021-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Disease

Keywords

Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular, Coronary Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Echocardiography, Stress

Brief summary

Invasive coronary angiography is currently considered gold standard in the assessment of coronary artery disease although the method has limitations. Most importantly invasive angiography only depicts coronary anatomy without determining its physiological significance i.e the likelihood that the stenosis impedes oxygen delivery to the heart muscle. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a catheterization technique for assessing the physiological significance of a coronary artery lesion during invasive coronary angiography. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive imaging test that has become an alternative route to diagnosis for patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Computational fluid dynamics combined with anatomical models based on CCTA scans allows determination of coronary flow and pressure, and has emerged as a promising diagnostic modality called CT-FFR. In this Project New Mathematical algorithms are developed for computation of CT-FFR. The main objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR values obtained by the new method compared with invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve and state-of-the-art dobutamin stress echocardiography.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCT-FFR

Invasive FFR and CCTA With CT-FFR

Stress echocardiography and invasive FFR

Sponsors

Norwegian University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Proven stenosis by CCTA that require further investigation with invasive coronary angiography i.e. patients with estimated stenosis ≥30- 50%. * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with unstable coronary artery disease. * Previously treated with PCI or coronary surgery. * Severe renal impairment i.e. GFR \<30ml / min * Contrast allergy * Contraindication to adenosine / nitroglycerin / beta-blocker * BMI\> 40 * Patients referred on the basis of technically unsuccessful CTA, motion artifact or similar

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CT- FFR values by New Method as a dichotomous variable4 weeksDetermining the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR values obtained by the new method compared with invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve
Worsening regional wall motion abnormality4 weeksDetermining the diagnostic accuracy of invasive FFR with comprehensive stress echocardiographic techniques

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026