Skip to content

Effect of a Novel Stretching Technique on Shoulder Range of Motion and Voluntary Contraction in Overhead Athletes With Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficits GIRD

Effect of a Novel Stretching Technique on Shoulder Range of Motion and Maximum Voluntary Contraction in Overhead Athletes With Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficits: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03044236
Acronym
GIRD
Enrollment
56
Registered
2017-02-06
Start date
2017-04-19
Completion date
2019-06-01
Last updated
2019-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficits

Brief summary

To examine and compare the effect of a novel stretching technique and traditional stretching on glenohumeral range of motion, strength, maximum voluntary contraction, pain, and subject satisfaction in overhead athletes with glenohumeral internal rotation deficits through a randomized clinical study.

Detailed description

To examine and compare the effect of a novel stretching technique and traditional stretching on glenohumeral range of motion, strength, maximum voluntary contraction, pain, and subject satisfaction in overhead athletes with glenohumeral internal rotation deficits through a randomized clinical study. The investigators hypothesize that this type of novel intervention will help subjects with GIRD to restore range of motion, experience less pain and maintain the strength and motor unit recruitment following the novel intervention. This will help us to assess the potential beneficial effect of such intervention and to fill the gap in knowledge and help health care professionals to adequately select the right treatment modality. Independent Variable 1\. Type of Intervention: * Traditional Stretching (Modified Sleep Stretch). VS * Novel Stretching (Active Shoulder Internal Rotation while Bridging) 2. Time * Pre VS post intervention Dependent Variables 1. Glenohumeral internal rotation ROM 2. Maximal glenohumeral external rotation isometric strength. 3. Mean motor unit recruitment (EMG) of the glenohumeral external rotator (infraspinatus) and internal rotators (pectoralis major and latissumus dorsi) 4. Pain 5. Subject satisfaction Instrumentation : 1. Glenohumeral internal & external rotation ROM: will be measured at baseline and at week four-post intervention for all participants. We will use the digital inclinometer. Research by (Kolber et al.,2011 ) showed this instrument to be reliable with an intra-rater ICC =0.87 and inter-rater ICC =0.93 2. Electronic push/pull dynamometer: At the end feel ROM, and before ROM is measured, the therapist will apply the same amount of pressure to all subjects to ensure reliable/ valid ROM measurements. 3. Maximal Glenohumeral External Rotation Isometric Strength will be measured using a MicroFET2 handheld digital dynamometer. This device was shown to be reliable with an intra-rater ICC =0.85 and inter-rater ICC =0.85. 4. Maximum Voluntary Contraction: will be measured using a 44 Delsys Bagnoli portable surface electromyography (sEMG) system. 5. Pain: will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The NPRS has shown to have a valid, reliable and appropriate for use in clinical practice Procedures: All participants will perform the static stretching (SS) conditions by themselves. The two stretching techniques will be home-based program.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStretching

The novel stretching technique will be done on a supine position. subjects will be asked bridge as high as possible. After That, Participants will then flex their shoulder and elbow to 90°. Participants will use the other hand to push to the point of mild discomfort and simultaneously maintain contraction while progressing the stretch.

Sponsors

Loma Linda University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must be between the age of 18 and 45. * Perform overhead sports activities in the past 3 months. * Participants are required to display ≥ 20° less glenohumeral internal rotation ROM in their dominant shoulder compare to the non- dominate shoulder. * Participants will be included with or without pain during shoulder activities.

Exclusion criteria

* Will exclude participants who are still recovering from previous surgery of the shoulder and elbow complex in the past 3 months, and currently receiving medical intervention for the shoulder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glenohumeral internal rotation ROMChange from baseline at week 4The investigators will use the digital inclinometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal glenohumeral external rotation isometric strengthChange from baseline at week 4will be measured using a MicroFET2 handheld digital dynamometer

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean motor unit recruitment (EMG) of the glenohumeral external rotator (infraspinatus) and internal rotators (pectoralis major and latissumus dorsi)Change from baseline at week 4will be measured using surface electromyography (sEMG) system
Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating ScaleChange from baseline at week 4will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Subject satisfaction will be measured using the Subject satisfaction FormWeek 4will be measured using the Subject satisfaction Form

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026