Skip to content

Central Executive Training for ADHD

Evaluating the Feasibility of Central Executive Training for Children With ADHD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03042338
Acronym
CET
Enrollment
54
Registered
2017-02-03
Start date
2017-03-31
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2021-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Brief summary

Feasibility study of Central Executive Training (CET) for ADHD. The goal of the current project is to develop and assess the feasibility, acceptability, engagement, and usability of a novel, central executive (CE) working memory training intervention.

Detailed description

The goal of the core study is to develop a central executive training (CET) intervention for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and examine its feasibility, acceptability, engagement, and usability. This will involve early developmental work on software and treatment manuals followed by evaluation of the feasibility of enrolling, retaining, and treating ADHD children with CET. An evidence-informed intervention targeting central executive functioning in children with ADHD has the potential to result in clinically significant improvements in ADHD symptoms relative to extant behavioral treatments and capacity-based (short-term memory) training interventions. The long-term goal is to develop an efficacious and acceptable CET intervention with the potential for generalized improvements in, or normalization of, ADHD-related impairments in peer, family, and academic functioning.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCET: Central Executive Training

CET: Central Executive Training

BEHAVIORALCET: Comparison Executive Training

CET: Comparison Executive Training

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Florida State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children ages 8-12 with principal ADHD diagnoses (via K-SADS) * parent Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Attention Problems or Hyperactivity subscale or ADHD-5 in clinical/borderline range based on age and gender * teacher BASC Attention Problems or Hyperactivity subscale or ADHD-5 scale in clinical/borderline range based on age and gender.

Exclusion criteria

* gross neurological, sensory, or motor impairment, history of a seizure disorder, or psychosis, bipolar disorders, substance use, or intellectual disability disorders * non-English speaking child or parent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rapport visuospatial/phonological working memory testApproximately 10 minute task administered during a 3 hour post-treatment testing session occurring within 2 weeks of last intervention sessionOutcome: stimuli correct

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Parent-reported ADHD symptoms (ADHD-5 rating scale)Parent questionnaire requiring approximately 15 minutes to complete, administered to parent while child is completing the 3 hour post-treatment testing session occurring within 2 weeks of last intervention session

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Teacher ADHD symptom ratings (ADHD-5 rating scale)Teacher questionnaire requiring approximately 15 minutes to complete, mailed to teacher within 2 weeks of child's last intervention session
Inhibition testApproximately 10 minute task administered during a 3 hour post-treatment testing session occurring within 2 weeks of last intervention sessionStop-signal and go/no-go scores will be combined via weighted average (factor score). Divergent validity (expected to improve more in comparison condition than experimental condition).
Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-3 (KTEA3) Listening ComprehensionApproximately 15 minute task administered during a 3 hour follow-up testing session occurring 2-4 months after last intervention session (variable time frame to account for school breaks)Growth scale value (GSV)
Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-3 (KTEA3) Reading ComprehensionApproximately 15 minute task administered during a 3 hour follow-up testing session occurring 2-4 months after last intervention session (variable time frame to account for school breaks)Growth scale value (GSV)
Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-3 (KTEA3) Reading FluencyApproximately 15 minute task administered during a 3 hour follow-up testing session occurring 2-4 months after last intervention session (variable time frame to account for school breaks)Growth scale value (GSV)
Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-3 (KTEA3) Math FluencyApproximately 15 minute task administered during a 3 hour follow-up testing session occurring 2-4 months after last intervention session (variable time frame to account for school breaks)Growth scale value (GSV)
Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-3 (KTEA3) Math Concepts and ApplicationsApproximately 15 minute task administered during a 3 hour follow-up testing session occurring 2-4 months after last intervention session (variable time frame to account for school breaks)Growth scale value (GSV)
NIH List SortingApproximately 15 minute task administered during a 3 hour follow-up testing session occurring 2-4 months after last intervention session (variable time frame to account for school breaks)Assessing feasibility of this test as possible primary outcomes for follow-up trial

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026