Skip to content

Lutetium-177 (Lu177) Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSMA)-Directed EndoRadiotherapy

PSMA-directed endoRadiothErapy of Castration-reSISTant Prostate Cancer (RESIST-PC). A Phase II Clinical Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03042312
Acronym
RESIST-PC
Enrollment
71
Registered
2017-02-03
Start date
2017-07-12
Completion date
2020-01-15
Last updated
2021-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

This was an open-label, multicenter, prospective trial to assess safety and efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

Detailed description

Upon inclusion patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two treatment doses. Radioligand therapy (RLT) were performed by repeated intravenous (i.v.) injection of 6.0 gigabecquerel (GBq) (+/- 10%) or 7.4 GBq (+/- 10%) 177Lu-PSMA-617 every 8+/- 1 weeks until reaching four cycles or threshold maximum dose to the kidneys of 23 Gray (Gy). All doses after labeling were presented in buffered solution for i.v. injection. In the initial plan for the study design a total of 200 patients with histologically proven prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were to be enrolled, however due to early stopping of enrollment only 71 patients were enrolled at time of data base lock. Each patient underwent a screening visit within 14 days prior to receiving study drug. Treatment was continued until either of the following conditions applied: * Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)/radiographic progression at \>= 12 weeks * Completion of four RLT cycles * 23 Gy kidney dose would be exceeded by the next cycle as estimated by dosimetry * Patient withdrawal (e.g. appearance of intolerable adverse events).

Interventions

DRUG177Lu-PSMA-617

Lutetium (177Lu) -DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid )-PSMA has three components: PSMA is the targeting vector , DOTA (1, 4, 7, 10-tetraazacyclododecane-1, 4, 7, 10-tetraacetic acid) is a radiometal chelator and a linking group, and 177Lu is the beta emitter that upon internalization delivers radiation to the nucleus of tumor cells to cause DNA damage. The targeting vector utilizes glu-urea-lys sequence which is an inhibitor capable of binding to the domain of PSMA. These components have been previously used in human subjects and in medical research.

Sponsors

Endocyte
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Prostate cancer proven by histopathology 2. Unresectable metastases 3. Progressive disease, both docetaxel naive and docetaxel treated. 4. Castration resistant disease with confirmed testosterone level ≤50 ng/ml under prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) 5. Positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (positron emission computed tomography ) or diagnostic 177Lu-PSMA-617 scintigraphy 6. ECOG 0-2 7. Sufficient bone marrow capacity as defined by WBC (white blood cell ) ≥2.500/μl, PLT (platelet) count ≥100.000/μl, Hb≥9.9 g/dl and ANC≥1500 mm3 for the first cycle and WBC≥2.000/ μl,PLT count ≥75.000/μl, Hb≥8.9 g/dl and ANC≥1000 mm3 for the subsequent cycles 8. Signing of the Informed Consent Form 9. Patients enrolling in this trail should have received either Enzalutamide or Abiraterone

Exclusion criteria

1. Less than 6 weeks since last myelosuppressive therapy (including Docetaxel, Cabazitaxel, 223Ra, 153Sm) or other radionuclide therapy. 2. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \<40 ml/min 3. Serum creatinine \> 1.5 ULN 4. AST and ALT\>5xULN 5. Urinary tract obstruction or marked hydronephrosis 6. Diffuse bone marrow involvement confirmed by super-scans

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsFrom first dosing (Day 0) up to last follow-up visit or until the event has resolved to baseline grade or better or the event was assessed stable by the investigator or the patient was lost to follow-up or withdrew consent, up to 24 monthsTreatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected from first dosing up to last follow-up visit or until the event has resolved to baseline grade or better or the event was assessed stable by the investigator or the patient was lost to follow-up or withdrew consent. The distribution of adverse events was done via the analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Event (TESAEs) and Deaths due to AEs, through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Number of Participants Achieving PSA Response at Week 12Week 12PSA response was defined as the proportion of patients who had a \>= 50% decrease in PSA from Baseline at Week 12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PSA Progression and Death EventsDate of randomization to the date of first documented PSA progression or death, whichever occurs first, reported between day of first patient randomized up to 24 months after the first treatmentPSA progression was defined as: 1. For patients with PSA decline: PSA progression was defined as the date that a \>= 25% increase in PSA and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL or more from the nadir was documented and confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later. Rises in PSA within the first 12 weeks were ignored (PCWG3 Guidance), 2. For patients without PSA decline: PSA progression was defined as a \>= 25% increase from the baseline value along with an increase in absolute value of 2 ng/mL or more after 12 weeks of treatment.
RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitBefore 3rd radioligand therapy (RLT) cycle, and then every 3 (+/- 1) months after last treatment dose until disease progression or 24 months after the first treatment dose.For each follow-up imaging assessment by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) for target, non-target, and new lesions assessed by CT or MRI: the number of participants with an overall response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD). The timing of follow-up imaging assessments varied depending on how many RLT cycles a participant received. Therefore, regardless of when the imaging assessments occurred, each participant's first follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 1, each participant's second follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 2, each participant's third follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 3, and each participant's fourth follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 4.
RECIST 1.1 Disease Control Rate by Follow-up Assessment VisitBefore 3rd radioligand therapy (RLT) cycle, and then every 3 (+/- 1) months after last treatment dose until disease progression or 24 months after the first treatment dose.The proportion of participants with an overall response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) was reported using investigator assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) for target, non-target, and new lesions assessed by CT or MRI. The timing of follow-up imaging assessments varied depending on how many RLT cycles a participant received. Therefore, regardless of when the imaging assessments occurred, each participant's first follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 1, each participant's second follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 2, each participant's third follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 3, and each participant's fourth follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 4.
Percent Change in PSA From Baseline to Week 12Week 12Percent change in PSA from Baseline to Week 12 was reported for participants who had a baseline and a week 12 valid assessments.
Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Follow-up Month 3The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-Composite (EPIC) is a well-established patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire developed to monitor health-related quality of life outcomes among prostate cancer. The 26-item version of EPIC, also known as EPIC Short Form or EPIC-26, contains 26 items and 5 domains: Urinary Incontinence (Items 1-4), Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Items 5-8), Bowel (Items 10-15), Sexual (Items 16-21), and Hormonal (Items 22-26). Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0 to 100 scale for each domain, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline, Treatment Visit 1, Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Follow-up Month 3, Follow-up Month 12, Follow-up Month 15The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score classifies participants according to their functional impairment, with scores ranging from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS: 0 = fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work; 2 = ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3 = capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair; 5 = dead.
Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitScreening, Week 8, Week 10, Week 16, Week 18, Week 22, Week 24, Follow-up Week 4, Follow-up Week 6, Follow-up Week 8Investigator's assessed bone metastases using the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria; new lesions had to be confirmed on a second scan (2+2 rule). The investigator documented their clinical impression of each PCWG3 assessment as Improved, Stable or Progression. The number of participants with a clinical impression of Improved, Stable or Progression according to PCWG3 using investigators assessments was reported by visit.
Maximum Percent Change in PSA ResponseEvery 6 weeks during the treatment and every 3 (+/- 1) months after last treatment until reaching endpoint or 24 months after the first treatmentMaximal baseline to follow-up PSA decline, at any time during or after therapy was evaluated in both treatment groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 2 centers in the USA

Participants by arm

ArmCount
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)
Repeated i.v. application of 6.0 GBq (gigabequerel)(+/- 10%, arm 1) every 8+/- 1 weeks; RLT until reaching four cycles or threshold maximum dose to the kidneys of 23 Gy as determined by dosimetry
28
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)
Repeated i.v. application of 7.4 GBq (gigabequerel)(+/- 10%, arm 2) of drug every 8+/- 1 weeks; RLT until reaching four cycles or threshold maximum dose to the kidneys of 23 Gy as determined by dosimetry
43
Total71

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative Reason11
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyAny occurrence of conditions which prevented the patient's participation in the study.42
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject45

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Total
Age, Continuous72.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39
69.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.62
70.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
26 Participants41 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants43 Participants71 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 233 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 2338 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 238 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Achieving PSA Response at Week 12

PSA response was defined as the proportion of patients who had a \>= 50% decrease in PSA from Baseline at Week 12.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with a value at both baseline and post baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants Achieving PSA Response at Week 12PSA Response (Increase from Baseline)3 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants Achieving PSA Response at Week 12PSA Response (< 50% decline)5 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants Achieving PSA Response at Week 12PSA Response (>= 50% decline)6 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants Achieving PSA Response at Week 12PSA Response (Increase from Baseline)11 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants Achieving PSA Response at Week 12PSA Response (< 50% decline)8 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants Achieving PSA Response at Week 12PSA Response (>= 50% decline)6 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected from first dosing up to last follow-up visit or until the event has resolved to baseline grade or better or the event was assessed stable by the investigator or the patient was lost to follow-up or withdrew consent. The distribution of adverse events was done via the analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Event (TESAEs) and Deaths due to AEs, through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters. Only descriptive analysis performed.

Time frame: From first dosing (Day 0) up to last follow-up visit or until the event has resolved to baseline grade or better or the event was assessed stable by the investigator or the patient was lost to follow-up or withdrew consent, up to 24 months

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsDrug-related TEAEs20 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTEAEs leading to reduction of Lu-PSMA-6170 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsSerious TEAEs4 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTEAEs leading to discontinuation of Lu-PSMA-6170 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsSerious drug-related TEAEs1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTEAEs leading to death2 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)22 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTEAEs leading to death1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)39 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsSerious TEAEs8 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsDrug-related TEAEs37 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsSerious drug-related TEAEs4 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTEAEs leading to reduction of Lu-PSMA-6172 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTEAEs leading to discontinuation of Lu-PSMA-6171 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score classifies participants according to their functional impairment, with scores ranging from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS: 0 = fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work; 2 = ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3 = capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair; 5 = dead.

Time frame: Baseline, Treatment Visit 1, Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Follow-up Month 3, Follow-up Month 12, Follow-up Month 15

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with a value at both baseline and post baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Treatment Visit 1-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Treatment Visit 2-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Treatment Visit 3-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Treatment Visit 4-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Follow-up Month 30.0 Scores on a scale
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Follow-up Month 150.0 Scores on a scale
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Treatment Visit 3-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Follow-up Month 12-1.0 Scores on a scale
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Treatment Visit 10.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Treatment Visit 4-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusChange from BL@Treatment Visit 2-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)

The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-Composite (EPIC) is a well-established patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire developed to monitor health-related quality of life outcomes among prostate cancer. The 26-item version of EPIC, also known as EPIC Short Form or EPIC-26, contains 26 items and 5 domains: Urinary Incontinence (Items 1-4), Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Items 5-8), Bowel (Items 10-15), Sexual (Items 16-21), and Hormonal (Items 22-26). Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0 to 100 scale for each domain, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Follow-up Month 3

Population: ITT Population. For each domain, only participants with a value at both baseline and post baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Baseline)83.2 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.73
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Sexual (Baseline)8.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.74
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Incontinence (Change from BL@Month 3)4.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.57
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Sexual (Change from BL@Month 3)-4.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.68
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Bowel (Baseline)90.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Sexual (Change from BL@Month 6)-4.7 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.02
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Change from BL@Month 3)17.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.37
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Bowel (Change from BL@Month 3)-1.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.55
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Hormonal (Baseline)77.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.19
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Incontinence (Change from BL@Month 6)11.1 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Hormonal (Change from BL@Month 3)4.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.35
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Bowel (Change from BL@Month 6)-4.2 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.33
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Hormonal (Change from BL@Month 6)1.7 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.87
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Change from BL@Month 6)2.1 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.55
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Incontinence (Baseline)78.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.87
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Sexual (Change from BL@Month 6)7.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.82
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Sexual (Change from BL@Follow-up Month 3)4.6 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.85
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Hormonal (Baseline)73.6 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.13
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Hormonal (Change from BL@Month 3)10.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.62
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Hormonal (Change from BL@Month 6)10.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Hormonal (Change from BL@Follow-up Month 3)8.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.64
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Incontinence (Baseline)77.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.64
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Incontinence (Change from BL@Month 3)9.7 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.88
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Incontinence (Change from BL@Month 6)-6.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.66
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Incontinence (Change from BL@Follow-up Month 3)-2.1 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.55
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Baseline)84.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.13
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Change from BL@Month 3)-1.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.17
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Change from BL@Month 6)6.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.84
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Change from BL@Follow-up Month 3)8.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.55
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Bowel (Baseline)88.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.77
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Bowel (Change from BL@Month 3)4.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.57
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Bowel (Change from BL@Month 6)4.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.75
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Bowel (Change from BL@Follow-up Month 3)-8.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.16
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Sexual (Baseline)11.7 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.66
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26)Sexual (Change from BL@Month 3)7.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.76
Secondary

Maximum Percent Change in PSA Response

Maximal baseline to follow-up PSA decline, at any time during or after therapy was evaluated in both treatment groups.

Time frame: Every 6 weeks during the treatment and every 3 (+/- 1) months after last treatment until reaching endpoint or 24 months after the first treatment

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with a value at both baseline and post baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Maximum Percent Change in PSA Response-3.63 PSA percent changeStandard Deviation 95.394
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Maximum Percent Change in PSA Response8.75 PSA percent changeStandard Deviation 132.954
Secondary

Percent Change in PSA From Baseline to Week 12

Percent change in PSA from Baseline to Week 12 was reported for participants who had a baseline and a week 12 valid assessments.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with a value at both baseline and post baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Percent Change in PSA From Baseline to Week 12-22.54 Percent change in PSAStandard Deviation 75.513
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Percent Change in PSA From Baseline to Week 1292.15 Percent change in PSAStandard Deviation 301.932
Secondary

Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by Visit

Investigator's assessed bone metastases using the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria; new lesions had to be confirmed on a second scan (2+2 rule). The investigator documented their clinical impression of each PCWG3 assessment as Improved, Stable or Progression. The number of participants with a clinical impression of Improved, Stable or Progression according to PCWG3 using investigators assessments was reported by visit.

Time frame: Screening, Week 8, Week 10, Week 16, Week 18, Week 22, Week 24, Follow-up Week 4, Follow-up Week 6, Follow-up Week 8

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with a value at both baseline and post baseline were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 22Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 10Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 22Stable0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitScreeningStable1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 22Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 16Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 24Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 8Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 24Stable0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 16Stable2 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 24Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 8Improved1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 4Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 16Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 4Stable0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 10Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 4Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 18Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 6Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitScreeningProgression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 6Stable0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 18Stable0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 6Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 10Stable2 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 8Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 18Progression1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 8Stable1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 8Stable1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 8Progression1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitScreeningImproved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 8Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitScreeningImproved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitScreeningStable0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitScreeningProgression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 8Improved3 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 8Stable2 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 8Progression1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 10Improved3 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 10Stable1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 10Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 16Improved2 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 16Stable0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 16Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 18Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 18Stable3 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 18Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 22Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 22Stable1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 22Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 24Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 24Stable1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitWeek 24Progression0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 4Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 4Stable0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 4Progression1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 6Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 6Stable0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 6Progression1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 8Improved0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Bone Scan Clinical Impression by VisitFollow-up Week 8Stable0 Participants
Secondary

PSA Progression and Death Events

PSA progression was defined as: 1. For patients with PSA decline: PSA progression was defined as the date that a \>= 25% increase in PSA and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL or more from the nadir was documented and confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later. Rises in PSA within the first 12 weeks were ignored (PCWG3 Guidance), 2. For patients without PSA decline: PSA progression was defined as a \>= 25% increase from the baseline value along with an increase in absolute value of 2 ng/mL or more after 12 weeks of treatment.

Time frame: Date of randomization to the date of first documented PSA progression or death, whichever occurs first, reported between day of first patient randomized up to 24 months after the first treatment

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with a value at both baseline and post baseline were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)PSA Progression and Death EventsDeaths without PSA progression2 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)PSA Progression and Death EventsParticipants with PSA progression, but who did not die11 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)PSA Progression and Death EventsDeaths without PSA progression2 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)PSA Progression and Death EventsParticipants with PSA progression, but who did not die17 Participants
Secondary

RECIST 1.1 Disease Control Rate by Follow-up Assessment Visit

The proportion of participants with an overall response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) was reported using investigator assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) for target, non-target, and new lesions assessed by CT or MRI. The timing of follow-up imaging assessments varied depending on how many RLT cycles a participant received. Therefore, regardless of when the imaging assessments occurred, each participant's first follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 1, each participant's second follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 2, each participant's third follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 3, and each participant's fourth follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 4.

Time frame: Before 3rd radioligand therapy (RLT) cycle, and then every 3 (+/- 1) months after last treatment dose until disease progression or 24 months after the first treatment dose.

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with a value at both baseline and post baseline were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Disease Control Rate by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 33.6 Percentage of participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Disease Control Rate by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 210.7 Percentage of participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Disease Control Rate by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 43.6 Percentage of participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Disease Control Rate by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 117.9 Percentage of participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Disease Control Rate by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 29.3 Percentage of participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Disease Control Rate by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 127.9 Percentage of participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Disease Control Rate by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 32.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment Visit

For each follow-up imaging assessment by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) for target, non-target, and new lesions assessed by CT or MRI: the number of participants with an overall response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD). The timing of follow-up imaging assessments varied depending on how many RLT cycles a participant received. Therefore, regardless of when the imaging assessments occurred, each participant's first follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 1, each participant's second follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 2, each participant's third follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 3, and each participant's fourth follow-up imaging was combined as Follow-up 4.

Time frame: Before 3rd radioligand therapy (RLT) cycle, and then every 3 (+/- 1) months after last treatment dose until disease progression or 24 months after the first treatment dose.

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with a value at both baseline and post baseline were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 1Complete Response1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 1Partial Response3 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 1Stable Disease1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 1Progressive Disease6 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 2Complete Response3 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 2Partial Response0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 2Stable Disease0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 2Progressive Disease1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 3Complete Response1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 3Partial Response0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 3Stable Disease0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 3Progressive Disease0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 4Complete Response0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 4Partial Response1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 4Stable Disease0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 4Progressive Disease0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 4Progressive Disease0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 1Complete Response1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 3Complete Response0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 1Partial Response4 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 4Complete Response0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 1Stable Disease7 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 3Partial Response0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 1Progressive Disease9 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 4Stable Disease0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 2Complete Response1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 3Stable Disease1 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 2Partial Response3 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 4Partial Response0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 2Stable Disease0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 3Progressive Disease0 Participants
177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq)RECIST 1.1 Overall Response by Follow-up Assessment VisitFollow-up 2Progressive Disease1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026