Skip to content

Manual Fascial Manipulation in Pregnant Women

The Influence of Manual Fascial Manipulation on the Function of the Pelvic Floor in Pregnant Women

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03041246
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-02-02
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2020-06-01
Last updated
2020-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Floor Disorders

Keywords

pelvic floor

Brief summary

Pregnancy and vaginal delivery are considered as the main risk factors for damage to the pelvic floor. There are various ways to measure the strength of the pelvic floor and to evaluate functional problems. Manual mobilization of the pelvic floor is a well-known treatment modality, however, ample knowledge exists on the efficacy of physiotherapy and exercise for improvement of pelvic floor function and strength. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of pelvic floor fascial mobilization (PFFM) technique on the function and strength of the pelvic floor muscles as well as parameters presumed to be influenced by the strength of the pelvic floor in pregnant women.

Detailed description

Pregnancy and vaginal delivery are considered as the main risk factors for damage to the pelvic floor at various degrees, starting at mild stress incontinence and up to fool fecal incontinence as well as pelvic pains or urination difficulties. There are various ways to measure the strength of the pelvic floor and to evaluate functional problems. Measured the strength of the pelvic floor muscles by physical examination according to Oxford Grading Scale (scale of 0-5) as well as by using Perineometer device, were equally efficient and well correlated. Other modalities such as the use of surface electro myography (EMG), that presents the level of the muscle electrical activity and expiration volumes and the strength of the pelvic floor muscles were also positively correlated to the strength of the pelvic floor. Recent studies presented dysfunction of pelvic floor during pregnancy as well as in the postpartum period by the use of pelvic floor disability index 20 (PFDI20) questionnaire validated in Hebrew. Ample knowledge exists on the efficacy of physiotherapy and exercise for improvement of pelvic floor function and strength, however, prolonged and continuous exercise is needed to achieve good results as well as compliance and perseverance. The long-term effect is unwieldly. Manual mobilization of the pelvic floor is a well-known treatment modality. However the literature regarding the effect of this technique is sparse. A recent series of case reports presented immediate and major improvement of pelvic floor dysfunction after manual mobilization. The peripartum period is critical for the function of the pelvic floor however the yield of manual therapy on function and strength of the pelvic floor was not evaluated in pregnant women. We hypothesize that manual therapy can improve the strength and the function of the pelvic floor within a short time span and this can be objectively measured by common and well used parameters The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of pelvic floor fascial mobilization (PFFM) on the function and strength of the pelvic floor muscles as well as parameters presumed to be influenced by the strength of the pelvic floor in pregnant women Materials and methods The study will involve number of phases: Phase one: Screening and enrollment of patients Women followed at the high risk pregnancy clinic at the Sheba medical center, who carry singleton pregnancy at the ages of 20-45 years old and about to have their 2nd to 4th delivery (primiparous and multiparous women) will be examined for the following parameters: demographic and medical data, focused interview for symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction including urination and fecal function as well as pelvic floor pain, manual assessment according the Oxford grading scale will be performed, and the strength of the pelvic floor measured by the use of Perineometer (Peritron 'AV' Combined Anal & Vaginal Perineometer NEW MODEL). Other parameters that will be measured include: mobilization of the pelvic-femoral joint, Forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) (a connection was shown between FEV1, intraabdominal pressure and the strength of the pelvic floor, assessment of vocal quality ( analyzed by communication clinician, repeat assessment will be performed after two weeks and after 4 weeks, estimated assessment time - 20 Min) 80 women are expected to be enrolled. Phase Two Women who will fulfill one or more of the following parameters will be enrolled to the second phase of the study . (n=40) 1. Oxford grading scale ≤3/5 2. Pelvic floor strength assessed by perineometer≤ 30 cm/h20 3. Clinical symptoms of urine, flatus or fecal incontinence 4. Pelvic floor, hip joint or pelvic joints pain Randomization will be performed to one of two groups: Group A-Control group (n=20) Group B-Study group (n=20) Guidance towards exercise for strengthening of the pelvic floor will be provided for both groups. Study group will be treated manually for the pelvic floor in two sessions two weeks apart. The manual manipulation of the pelvic floor will involve intra vaginal superficial as well as pelvic skin area pressure points. The manipulation will not involve the cervix uterus or rectum. Each session will lasts one hour Both groups will be assessed by ultrasound for blood flow in the middle cerebral artery, umbilical artery and uterine artery as part of the parameters that may show benefit to the fetus due to pelvic floor mobilization. Reassessment of all the women and repeat treatment for the study group will be performed after two and four weeks from the primary assessment. The study will be performed at a high risk pregnancy clinic at the Sheba medical center. Women will be enrolled voluntarily with no financial benefit.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPelvic floor fascial mobilization

The manual manipulation of the pelvic floor involves intra vaginal superficial as well as pelvic skin area pressure points.

Sponsors

Sheba Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

On enrollment, dividing the healthy ( n=40) from the pathological function of the pelvic floor ( n=40). From the second group, randomizing the groups to study group: recieving pelvic floor fascial mobilization (PFFM) treatment (n=20)compared to control group (n=20).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 20-45 years old 2. Gestational age 24-30 weeks gestation 3. Singleton pregnancy 4. Expected second-4ourth delivery

Exclusion criteria

1. First delivery 2. Gestational age at more than 30 weeks gestation at enrollment 3. Premature contractions 4. Cervical insufficiency 5. Placenta previa 6. Placenta accrete 7. Multifetal pregnancy 8. Maternal chronic illness including connective tissue disease, neurological illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Contraction strengthChange of contraction strength is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )Contraction strength assessed by Oxford grading scale
Contraction pressureChange of contraction pressure is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )Contraction pressure measured by using Peritron perineometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptoms associated with pelvic dysfunctionChange of pelvic dysfunction is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )Assessment of symptoms associated with pelvic dysfunction: urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, frequency and urgency (by the use of pelvic floor disability index 20 - a questionaire including 20 questions on pelvic floor function)
FEV1Change of FEV1 is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )Forced expiratory volume 1
Voice Handicap Index - 10 among Hebrew speakers (VHI-10-HEB) questionaireChange of VHI-10-HEB is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )Evaluation of the validity of the voice handicap index that includes ten questions concerning voice usage among hebrew speakers

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026