Skip to content

Best Incision Site for Obese Patients - Low Versus High Transverse

Best Incision Site for Obese Patients - Low Versus High Transverse

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03041220
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-02-02
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2023-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Section

Brief summary

Retrospective chart review using both out patient and inpatient records of obese patients (BMI of 30 or greater) who have had a cesarean section since the year 2009. We will evaluate the patient's BMI, their skin incision type at time of c-section, their co-morbidities, number of previous c-sections and post partum follow up for wound infection, wound separation and wound breakdown. We will also review operative notes to evaluate blood loss, length of surgery and complications during surgery. We will obtain maternal characteristics and information about the pregnancy.

Detailed description

Past studies have looked primarily at vertical vs low transverse skin incision. There is data that performing a high transverse skin incision on obese patients leads to better visualization and less wound infection but there are few studies comparing it directly to low transverse skin incision. Retrospective chart review of obese patient's who have had a cesarean section at St Mary's hospital by either a low or high transverse skin incision between January 1, 2009 - July 31, 2014. We will review charts up to 6 week postpartum. Pregnancies will be identified through identifing those who have cesarean sections. They will be narrowed down by those who have BMI of \> 30. Maternal prenatal records, postnatal records and delivery records will be reviewed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcesarean section

obese patients (BMI of 30 or greater) who have had a cesarean section

Sponsors

University of Nebraska
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* obese patients (BMI of 30 or greater) who have had a cesarean section

Exclusion criteria

* Vaginal delivery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Type of skin incisionDelivery to 6 weeks postpartumIdentify which type of skin incision has better outcomes in obese pregnant patients

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026