Skip to content

Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) or Placebo With Chemoradiation in Participants With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (MK-3475-412/KEYNOTE-412)

A Randomized Phase III Study of Pembrolizumab Given Concomitantly With Chemoradiation and as Maintenance Therapy Versus Chemoradiation Alone in Subjects With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (KEYNOTE-412)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03040999
Enrollment
804
Registered
2017-02-02
Start date
2017-04-05
Completion date
2024-08-21
Last updated
2026-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Neoplasms

Keywords

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Programmed Cell Death Receptor 1 (PD-1), Programmed Cell Death Receptor Ligand 1 (PD-L1), Programmed Cell Death Receptor Ligand 2 (PD-L2), PD1, PD-1, PDL1, PD-L1, PDL2

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab given concomitantly with chemoradiation (CRT) and as maintenance therapy versus placebo plus CRT in participants with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC). The primary hypothesis is that pembrolizumab in combination with CRT is superior to placebo in combination with CRT with respect to event-free survival (EFS).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPembrolizumab

Administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (Q3W)

DRUGPlacebo

Normal saline or dextrose solution administered as an IV infusion Q3W

DRUGCisplatin

100 mg/m\^2 administered as an IV infusion Q3W

RADIATIONAccelerated Fractionation (AFX) Radiotherapy

70 Gray (Gy) given in 35 fractions over 6 weeks

RADIATIONStandard Fractionation (SFX) Radiotherapy

70 Gy given in 35 fractions over 7 weeks

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has a pathologically proven new diagnosis of oropharyngeal p16 positive, oropharyngeal p16 negative, or larynx/hypopharynx/oral cavity (independent of p16) squamous cell carcinoma. Participants with oral cavity tumors need to have unresectable disease. Participants with multiple synchronous tumors are not eligible for the study. * Has provided tissue for Programmed Cell Death Receptor Ligand 1 (PD-L1) biomarker analysis from a core or excisional biopsy. If an excisional or incisional biopsy has been performed, participants remain eligible for the study provided the residual disease meets the staging criteria required for the trial (e.g., excisional biopsy of a lymph node with residual T4 primary). Prior surgical debulking, including tonsillectomy, for the head and neck cancer under study is not allowed. * Has evaluable tumor burden (measurable and/or non-measurable tumor lesions) assessed by computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging, based on RECIST version 1.1 * Is eligible for definitive CRT and not considered for primary surgery based on investigator decision * Has Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 performed within 10 days prior to receiving the first dose of study therapy * Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to receiving the first dose of study therapy * Female and male participants of reproductive potential must agree to use adequate contraception throughout the study period and for up to 180 days after the last dose of study therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Is currently participating or has participated in a study with an investigational agent or using an investigational device within 4 weeks of the first dose of study therapy * Has received prior therapy with an anti-Programmed Cell Death Receptor 1 (PD-1), anti-PD-L1, anti-Programmed Cell Death Receptor Ligand 2 (PD-L2) agent or with an agent directed to another co-inhibitory T-cell receptor or has previously participated in clinical studies with pembrolizumab * Has received a live vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of study therapy * Has cancer outside of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx or oral cavity, such as nasopharyngeal, sinus, other para-nasal, or other unknown primary head and neck cancer * Has had prior systemic therapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy treatment or radical surgery for head and neck cancer under study * Has not recovered from major surgery prior to starting study therapy * Has known active Hepatitis B or C * Has known history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) * Has a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving systemic steroid therapy or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of study therapy * Has a history of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required steroids or current pneumonitis * Has an active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years. Replacement therapy is not considered a form of systemic treatment. * Has history of a diagnosed and/or treated hematologic or primary solid tumor malignancy, unless in remission for at least 5 years prior to randomization * Has known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis * Has had previous allogeneic tissue/solid organ transplant * Has active infection requiring systemic therapy * Has a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction to pembrolizumab, Cisplatin or radiotherapy or their analogs * Is pregnant or breast feeding or expecting to conceive or father children throughout the study period and for up to 180 days after the last dose of study therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-free Survival (EFS)Up to approximately 62 monthsEFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first record of any of the following events: death due to any cause; progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR) or biopsy as indicated for locoregional progression or recurrence or distant metastasis. As well as the first record of the following types of surgery: salvage surgery for persistent or residual disease at the primary tumor site requiring surgical removal when invasive cancer is present on final pathology; neck dissection or surgery (performed for clinical or radiological disease progression per RECIST 1.1) ≤ 20 weeks from end of CRT when invasive cancer is present; or neck dissection or surgery \>20 weeks from end of CRT when invasive cancer is present. The non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the EFS curve in each treatment group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 62 monthsOS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis were censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive. The non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curve in each treatment group.
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 88 monthsAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE is any sign, symptom, disease, or worsening of preexisting condition temporally associated with study therapy and irrespective of causality to study therapy. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AEUp to approximately 15 monthsAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE is any sign, symptom, disease, or worsening of preexisting condition temporally associated with study therapy and irrespective of causality to study therapy. The number of participants who discontinued study drug due to an AE is presented.
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) ScoreBaseline and up to week 45The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. For Global Health Status (GHS) (Item 29), participants are asked "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" Individual items are scored on a 7-point (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Raw scores for each scale are standardized into a range of 0 to 100 by linear transformation, with a higher score indicating a better level of function and better overall GHS. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-C30 scale is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with the patient reported outcomes (PRO) scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of human papilloma virus (HPV) status and overall cancer stage.
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Swallowing ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Questionnaire (H\&N35) measures QoL in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. It consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more problems. Change from baseline in swallowing was measured. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Speech ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Questionnaire (H\&N35) measures QoL in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. It consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 30-32) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more problems. Change from baseline in speech was measured. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Pain Symptom ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Questionnaire (H\&N35) measures QoL in head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients. It consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more problems. Change from baseline in pain symptoms was measured. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Participant responded to 5 questions from the EORTC QLQ-C30 about their physical functioning scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a better physical functioning. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point scale is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis was based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Czechia, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORMedical Director

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled who had locally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and who were eligible for definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and not considered for primary surgery based on investigator decision; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1; had no distant metastases; and no active autoimmune disease or infection requiring systemic therapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab
On Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days), participants received a priming dose of 200 mg Pembrolizumab followed by 100 mg/m\^2 Cisplatin PLUS 70 Gray (Gy) Radiotherapy (accelerated (AFX) or standard fractionation radiotherapy (SFX)) on Day 8 of Cycles 1, 2 and Cycle 3 (SFX RT regimen only). During CRT, participants received 2 doses of pembrolizumab (Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3) and up to 3 cycles of Cisplatin (2 cycles during AFX and 3 cycles during SFX RT). Participants also received up to an additional 14 cycles of pembrolizumab alone as maintenance therapy for a total of 17 cycles of pembrolizumab (approximately 1 year). If cisplatin and/or radiation therapy was discontinued, the participant may continue on treatment with pembrolizumab.
402
Placebo + CRT + Placebo
On Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days), participants received placebo followed by 100 mg/m\^2 Cisplatin PLUS 70 Gray (Gy) Radiotherapy (accelerated (AFX) or standard fractionation radiotherapy (SFX)) on Day 8 of Cycles 1, 2 and Cycle 3 (SFX RT regimen only). During CRT, participants received 2 doses of placebo (Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 3) and up to 3 cycles of Cisplatin (2 cycles during AFX and 3 cycles during SFX RT). Participants also received up to an additional 14 cycles of placebo alone as maintenance therapy for a total of 17 cycles of placebo (approximately 1 year). If cisplatin and/or radiation therapy was discontinued, the participant may continue on treatment with placebo.
402
Total804

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabPlacebo + CRT + Placebo
Age, Continuous58.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
58.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
58.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
Disease stage at baseline
AJCC7 III
19 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Disease stage at baseline
AJCC7 IVA
119 Participants61 Participants58 Participants
Disease stage at baseline
AJCC7 IVB
26 Participants12 Participants14 Participants
Disease stage at baseline
AJCC8 II
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Disease stage at baseline
AJCC8 III
257 Participants132 Participants125 Participants
Disease stage at baseline
AJCC8 IVA
298 Participants146 Participants152 Participants
Disease stage at baseline
AJCC8 IVB
84 Participants43 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
106 Participants47 Participants59 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
636 Participants324 Participants312 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
62 Participants31 Participants31 Participants
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Status
Negative
591 Participants293 Participants298 Participants
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Status
Positive
213 Participants109 Participants104 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
102 Participants54 Participants48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
47 Participants19 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
627 Participants314 Participants313 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
144 Participants71 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
660 Participants331 Participants329 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
156 / 402178 / 402
other
Total, other adverse events
398 / 398396 / 398
serious
Total, serious adverse events
245 / 398197 / 398

Outcome results

Primary

Event-free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first record of any of the following events: death due to any cause; progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR) or biopsy as indicated for locoregional progression or recurrence or distant metastasis. As well as the first record of the following types of surgery: salvage surgery for persistent or residual disease at the primary tumor site requiring surgical removal when invasive cancer is present on final pathology; neck dissection or surgery (performed for clinical or radiological disease progression per RECIST 1.1) ≤ 20 weeks from end of CRT when invasive cancer is present; or neck dissection or surgery \>20 weeks from end of CRT when invasive cancer is present. The non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the EFS curve in each treatment group.

Time frame: Up to approximately 62 months

Population: All randomized participants based on the treatment group to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabEvent-free Survival (EFS)NA Months
Placebo + CRT + PlaceboEvent-free Survival (EFS)46.6 Months
p-value: 0.042995% CI: [0.68, 1.03]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) Score

The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. For Global Health Status (GHS) (Item 29), participants are asked How would you rate your overall health during the past week? Individual items are scored on a 7-point (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Raw scores for each scale are standardized into a range of 0 to 100 by linear transformation, with a higher score indicating a better level of function and better overall GHS. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-C30 scale is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with the patient reported outcomes (PRO) scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of human papilloma virus (HPV) status and overall cancer stage.

Time frame: Baseline and up to week 45

Population: Participants with at least one patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) Score1.93 Scores on a scale
Placebo + CRT + PlaceboChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) Score6.17 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Difference in Least Squares Meanp-value: 0.001595% CI: [-6.85, -1.63]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning Score

The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Participant responded to 5 questions from the EORTC QLQ-C30 about their physical functioning scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a better physical functioning. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point scale is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis was based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 45

Population: Participants with at least one PRO assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning Score-5.58 Scores on a scale
Placebo + CRT + PlaceboChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning Score-3.53 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Difference in Least Squares Meanp-value: 0.096395% CI: [-4.47, 0.37]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Pain Symptom Score

EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Questionnaire (H&N35) measures QoL in head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients. It consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more problems. Change from baseline in pain symptoms was measured. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 45

Population: Participants with at least one PRO assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Pain Symptom Score-10.55 Scores on a scale
Placebo + CRT + PlaceboChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Pain Symptom Score-11.84 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Difference in Least Squares Meanp-value: 0.352495% CI: [-1.43, 4.02]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Speech Score

EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Questionnaire (H&N35) measures QoL in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. It consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 30-32) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more problems. Change from baseline in speech was measured. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 45

Population: Participants with at least one PRO assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Speech Score-6.22 Scores on a scale
Placebo + CRT + PlaceboChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Speech Score-4.93 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Difference in Least Squares Meanp-value: 0.4595% CI: [-4.64, 2.06]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Swallowing Score

EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Questionnaire (H&N35) measures QoL in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. It consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more problems. Change from baseline in swallowing was measured. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 45

Population: Participants with at least one PRO assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Swallowing Score-3.86 Scores on a scale
Placebo + CRT + PlaceboChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Swallowing Score-3.35 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Difference in Least Squares Meanp-value: 0.771995% CI: [-3.98, 2.96]cLDA
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE is any sign, symptom, disease, or worsening of preexisting condition temporally associated with study therapy and irrespective of causality to study therapy. The number of participants who discontinued study drug due to an AE is presented.

Time frame: Up to approximately 15 months

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE163 Participants
Placebo + CRT + PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE132 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE is any sign, symptom, disease, or worsening of preexisting condition temporally associated with study therapy and irrespective of causality to study therapy. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented.

Time frame: Up to approximately 88 months

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)398 Participants
Placebo + CRT + PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)397 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis were censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive. The non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curve in each treatment group.

Time frame: Up to approximately 62 months

Population: All randomized participants based on the treatment group to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabOverall Survival (OS)NA Months
Placebo + CRT + PlaceboOverall Survival (OS)NA Months
p-value: 0.199795% CI: [0.71, 1.15]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026